RamanBench: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Machine Learning on Raman Spectroscopy

Raman spectroscopy enables non-destructive, label-free molecular characterization across materials science, biomedicine and process monitoring. Predictive Raman datasets often contain few labelled spectra and thousands of ordered wavenumbers, with informative variation within bands and across distant spectral regions. Latent-variable chemometrics accommodates collinear small-sample data but can obscure fine peak morphology, whereas deep spectral networks resolve this structure only after task-specific training. TabPFN avoids task-specific parameter fitting through pretrained in-context inference, but processes very wide inputs as feature-subsampled views that do not preserve joint visibility of related bands. We present RamanPFN, a spectral representation framework that encodes these dependencies before TabPFN inference. Global Compositional Unmixing constructs non-negative coordinates over the complete spectrum so that distant bands with shared latent variation occupy a common predictive axis. Local Vibrational Subspace Encoding represents contiguous wavenumber regions with multiple orthogonal modes that retain independent changes in peak shape, intensity and position. The representations are evaluated separately and combined at the prediction level. Evaluation covered 150 tasks from 74 public Raman datasets. RamanPFN reduced root-mean-square error by 19.6% on average across 129 regression targets relative to direct TabPFN inference and further reduced the remaining classification error by 9.0% across 21 classification tasks. These results establish explicit spectral representation as an effective interface between high-dimensional Raman measurements and reusable tabular inference.

Raman spectroscopy provides label-free, chemically specific characterization of biological systems and has become an important tool for cancer diagnosis, molecular subtyping, microbiological identification, and intraoperative decision support. Biomedical Raman spectra are, however, high-dimensional, noisy, and affected by fluorescence background, acquisition variability, and biological heterogeneity, making robust computational analysis essential. This review examines the role of machine learning across the biomedical Raman spectroscopy pipeline, from preprocessing and signal correction to unsupervised structure discovery, supervised diagnosis and molecular stratification, representation and transfer learning, explainability, biomarker discovery, and multimodal integration with imaging, pathology, and molecular profiling. Emphasis is placed on the use of machine learning not only for diagnostic classification, but also for biologically interpretable and clinically actionable analysis. We also discuss the main barriers to clinical translation, including limited dataset sizes, inter-instrument variability, inconsistent preprocessing, insufficient external validation, reproducibility concerns, and limited sharing of software, data, and metadata. We argue that progress will require methodological advances together with standardization, robust validation, explainability, and deployment-ready analytical frameworks. By integrating methodological, biomedical, and translational perspectives, this review outlines key directions for developing reliable and clinically deployable Raman-AI systems.

Existing spectral benchmarks are limited in scale, modality alignment, and evaluation scope, and typically focus on either specialized models or multimodal language models (MLLMs). We introduce SpecX, a large-scale benchmark for multi-modal spectroscopy with cross-paradigm evaluation. SpecX contains 1.7M molecules with diverse spectral modalities, including NMR (1H, 13C, HSQC), IR, MS,UV,Raman and FL, and is organized into three tiers: a large-scale dataset for pretraining, an aligned multi-spectral subset for benchmarking, and a high-quality experimental subset for evaluation. SpecX supports a range of tasks such as molecular elucidation, spectrum simulation, and spectral understanding, and enables unified evaluation across both specialized spectral models and MLLMs. Experiments show that specialized models excel at signal-level modeling, while MLLMs exhibit strengths in high-level reasoning but lack precise spectral grounding. SpecX establishes a unified benchmark for spectral intelligence and highlights the need for spectrum-native foundation models.