Organizations: School of Information Technology, Monash University, Selangor, Malaysia · Department of Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China · School of Engineering, Monash University, Selangor, Malaysia
Real-time crack segmentation is vital for structural health monitoring but is plagued by aleatoric uncertainties arising from varying lighting, blur, and texture ambiguity. Current uncertainty-aware approaches typically treat uncertainty estimation as a passive endpoint for post-hoc analysis, failing to close the loop by feeding this information back to refine feature representations. We contend that independent pixel-wise heteroscedastic modeling is uniquely suited for crack segmentation, as cracks are defined by fine-grained local gradients rather than the global semantic coherence relied upon in general object segmentation. However, this approach suffers from a structural optimization pathology: high predicted variance attenuates loss gradients, effectively causing the model to ignore difficult samples and under-fit complex boundaries. To address these challenges, we propose UnGAP, a novel framework that establishes a closed-loop mechanism between uncertainty estimation and feature learning. Central to our approach is the Uncertainty-Prompted Feature Modulator (UPFM), which treats aleatoric uncertainty as an active visual prompt rather than a mere output. UPFM dynamically calibrates feature distributions through pixel-wise affine transformations. Crucially, this mechanism mitigates the heteroscedastic pathology by transforming high variance, which would otherwise indicate gradient suppression, into a constructive signal for stronger feature rectification in ambiguous regions. Additionally, a boundary-aware detection head is introduced to further constrain prediction precision. Extensive experiments demonstrate that UnGAP balances superior segmentation accuracy with real-time inference speed, effectively validating the benefit of transforming uncertainty from a passive metric into an active calibration tool.
In this study, we explore in depth a few under-studied topics at the intersection of uncertainty estimation and segmentation. Prior work has shown that the quality of uncertainty estimates can be very sensitive to a range of variables. As one of the main uses of uncertainty estimation is to help identify and deal with prediction errors in practical scenarios, any factors that affect this must be clearly identified. For example, do more challenging domains or different datasets and architectures result in worse performance when using uncertainty estimates? Can prior frames in a video sequence in fact provide useful uncertainty estimates comparable to other approaches? Is it possible to combine uncertainty estimation approaches, taking advantage of sample diversity, to get better estimates? Finally, when might it make sense to use an ensemble-based uncertainty estimate over a deterministic network? We address these questions by creating a framework for and executing a large scale study across many variables such as datasets, backbones, and downstream tasks, for both semantic and panoptic segmentation. We find that a) the more challenging task of panoptic segmentation usually results in worse performance while high performance variance between datasets and backbones indicates that generalization is not guaranteed, b) time series samples can be useful for specific configurations, but in many cases are not worth the cost, c) sample diversity shows the most promise in the downstream task of calibration, but otherwise fails to beat simpler alternatives, d) a deterministic approach is adequate for some downstream tasks, but ensembles allow for significant improvements if the right conditions can be achieved in deployment.
Reliable crack assessment requires not only accurate pixel-level masks but also connected crack geometry and confidence estimates that remain stable under domain shift. However, existing segmentation models can achieve high overlap scores while fragmenting cracks, missing fine branches, and providing no calibrated uncertainty. To address this gap, this paper proposes CrackGeoFM, a multi-task framework that combines a frozen visual foundation backbone with crack-specific adaptation for mask prediction, skeleton reconstruction, and uncertainty estimation. The framework integrates a Frequency-Guided Crack Enhancement Module (FCEM) to enhance high-frequency crack cues, a Crack-Domain Feature Adaptation Module (CFAM) to adapt frozen backbone features to crack-domain patterns, and a Structure-Aware Multi-Task Decoder (SMTD) to jointly decode masks, skeletons, and uncertainty. Across 20 crack datasets, CrackGeoFM achieves state-of-the-art segmentation, improved topology preservation, calibrated uncertainty, and effective few-shot adaptation with only five labeled images. These results support reliable, generalizable, and engineering-oriented crack analysis for infrastructure assessment.
Recent crack segmentation methods often follow generic semantic segmentation designs, using stronger backbones, hybrid CNN-Transformer-Mamba encoders, and auxiliary enhancement branches. Although effective, this raises whether stronger generic feature mixing is the most suitable direction for crack segmentation. We instead formulate crack segmentation as sparse structural recovery. Cracks have limited category-level semantics but strong morphological regularities, being thin, sparse, anisotropic, locally fragmented, and easily confused with textures or shadows. Thus, the key bottleneck lies in preserving weak structural evidence, recovering directional continuity, and suppressing background coupling. We propose RIFT, a compact family of morphology-aligned crack segmentation models. Rather than compressing a complex generic architecture, RIFT is simple by design, preserving local evidence, aggregating cooperative directional continuity, and restoring crack structures through lightweight multi-scale fusion. Experiments on four public benchmarks show that RIFT achieves the best or tied-best results across the 16 main metrics against reproduced representative baselines. RIFT-B gives the strongest overall accuracy, while RIFT-T provides the best deployment efficiency with only 0.47M parameters and high inference speed. Topology-aware evaluation, ablations, transfer experiments, and visualizations further verify that task-aligned simplicity can match or surpass complex hybrid architectures when its inductive bias fits crack morphology. Code: https://github.com/xauat-liushipeng/RIFT