Understanding how biological and artificial neural networks implement computation from connectivity is a central problem in neuroscience and machine learning. In neural systems, structural and functional connectivity are known to diverge, motivating approaches that move beyond direct connections alone. Here, we show that the spatial and temporal function of recurrent neural networks (RNNs) trained on hierarchically modular tasks can be recovered by modelling the network as a graph and analysing the multi-hop pathways between input and output units. In particular, decomposing these pathways by hop length reveals how the network temporally routes information. This perspective reframes regularisation: if function is implemented through multi-hop communication, then standard penalties such as L1 regularisation, which act only on individual weights, constrain single-hop structure rather than the multi-hop pathways that support computation. Motivated by this view, we introduce resolvent-RNNs (R-RNNs), which constrain multi-hop pathways and thereby induce temporal sparsity beyond that achieved by standard L1 regularisation. Compared with L1 regularisation, R-RNNs achieve improved performance by inducing temporal sparsity that matches the task structure, even when the task signal is sparse. Moreover, R-RNNs exhibit stronger sparsity-function alignment, reflected in their increased robustness under strong regularisation. Together, our results identify multi-hop communication as a key principle linking structure to function in recurrent networks, and suggest that sparsity should be defined over functional pathways rather than individual parameters.
Understanding how the architecture of neural networks shapes the computations they carry is a central challenge in neuroscience and machine learning. While specific circuit architectures have been linked to particular network computations and theoretical bounds on expressivity of broad classes of networks have been found, we are still missing general principles connecting the structure of finite networks to their computational capabilities. Here, we characterize the computational abilities of recurrent neural networks as a function of their connectivity by training a large collection of different networks to compute a large set of Boolean functions. For small networks, we constructed the complete ``catalogs'' of network-function performance, which revealed that computational capacity varies widely across architectures and that most networks show poor performance, and most functions are hard to compute. However, we show that having local 2- and 3-cycles in a network strongly enhances its computational ability, and networks with such cycles are often the minimal architectures that can solve particular functions. We further show that a small set of structural statistics accurately predict networks' performance. Extending our analysis to large networks showed that typical networks fail even to approximate a randomly selected function. Surprisingly, adding a small number of sparsely connected biologically-inspired interneurons to the network dramatically increases computational capacity. As in small networks, adding short cycles improved networks' capacity, outperforming acyclic or reachability-matched controls. Thus, our results identify local cycles as design principles linking neural connectivity to computational power, and offer a general framework to explore structure-function relations in computing networks.
The pruning of network connections is key to brain function but, despite its importance, there exist few biologically-plausible pruning rules with demonstrated good performance. In this work we evaluate noise-prune, a recently introduced unsupervised local pruning rule for recurrent networks that uses noisy fluctuations to determine the importance of connections. Noise-prune has previously only been empirically tested on random networks without a specific computational function. We show that noise-prune preserves task-performance in task-trained recurrent neural networks, greatly outperforming a strategy that only uses the magnitude of connections and performing on par with or exceeding a non-local strategy that uses second-order information. Rather than deterministically removing connections that fall below a certain threshold importance, noise-prune samples connections to preserve based on their importance and strengthens retained connections to preserve average synaptic strength. We show that this sampling and rescaling is essential to good performance, but that the optimal empirical degree of rescaling is lower than that predicted by the original theoretical argument. Our work thus validates noise-prune as a biologically-plausible pruning rule for functional recurrent network architectures and characterizes its optimal parameter settings.
Learning in neural systems arises from synaptic changes that reshape the representations underlying behavior. While low-rank recurrent neural networks (RNNs) have emerged as a powerful framework for linking connectivity to function, a theoretical understanding of their learning process remains elusive. Here, we extend the low-rank framework from activity to learning by deriving gradient-descent dynamics directly in a reduced overlap space. We formulate a closed-form, low-dimensional system of ODEs that governs learning in this space, exact for linear RNNs and asymptotically exact for nonlinear RNNs in the large-N Gaussian limit. Central to our analysis is a distinction between two classes of overlaps: loss-visible overlaps, which fully determine network activity, output, and loss, and loss-invisible overlaps, which do not affect function but are required to describe learning. We illustrate the consequences of this decomposition through two phenomena. First, we show that learning can serve as a perturbation that exposes differences in connectivity between functionally equivalent networks. Second, we show that loss-invisible overlaps can act as memory variables that encode training history, and characterize the conditions under which this occurs. Finally, we present several testable predictions for biological learning experiments derived from our theory.