Vision-language models have demonstrated strong performance across robotic perception and instruction-following tasks. However, they still struggle with precise spatial reasoning, particularly in predicting object locations and fine-grained object states. We propose StateVLM, a vision-language model designed to learn fine-grained object representations, including object localization and grasp-relevant region prediction. We introduce a joint training objective that integrates an auxiliary regression loss (ARL) with the standard causal language modeling (CLM) objective to improve numerical reasoning and spatial understanding. To evaluate whether models can move beyond category-level grounding toward state-aware spatial understanding, we introduce an open-source benchmark, Object State Affordance Reasoning (OSAR), comprising 1,172 scenes with 7,746 individual objects and their corresponding bounding boxes. Empirical experiments on the Referring Expression Comprehension datasets demonstrate that integrating ARL improves model performance compared with CLM only. Experiments on the OSAR benchmark further demonstrate that StateVLM with ARL achieves an average improvement of 5.2% over models trained with CLM only. These results show that ARL is particularly beneficial for the complex affordance reasoning tasks that require object state understanding. The joint training objective in StateVLM demonstrates that integrating an auxiliary regression objective into VLM training improves numerical reasoning, and the OSAR benchmark provides a new testbed for understanding object state affordances in robotics.
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used to evaluate robot manipulation outcomes, but existing benchmarks offer limited evidence of cross-domain generalization. We introduce FailBench, a benchmark for robot failure detection comprising 2,197 manipulation attempts across 14 public sources (12 real-world, 2 simulated). In FailBench, 75% of failures occur naturally, and six real-world sources come from non-failure-detection datasets. Evaluating 13 VLM-based detectors, we find the best model achieves only 0.77 mean balanced accuracy. Notably, models fine-tuned for failure detection consistently underperform general-purpose VLMs and their own pretrained baselines. Performance depends heavily on required visual evidence: models approach saturation when outcomes depend on observable object motion, but degrade to near-chance (<0.60 balanced accuracy) on contact-intensive assembly tasks. Error analysis reveals a systematic bias toward predicting success under ambiguous evidence, which persists even with increased reasoning effort. Finally, we show that input-level intervention--spatially localizing and cropping outcome-relevant regions--improves the top detector by 2.4 percentage points without extra training.
Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have benefited from Reinforcement Learning (RL) for enhanced reasoning. However, existing methods still face critical limitations, including the lack of low-level visual information and effective visual feedback. To address these problems, this paper proposes a unified multimodal interleaved reasoning framework \textbf{ForeSight}, which enables VLMs to \textbf{See Further} with low-level visual cues and \textbf{Think Deeper} with effective visual feedback. First, it introduces a set of low-level visual tools to integrate essential visual information into the reasoning chain, mitigating the neglect of fine-grained visual features. Second, a mask-based visual feedback mechanism is elaborated to incorporate visual reflection into the thinking process, enabling the model to dynamically re-examine and update its answers. Driven by RL, ForeSight learns to autonomously decide on tool invocation and answer verification, with the final answer accuracy as the reward signal. To evaluate the performance of the proposed framework, we construct a new dataset, Character and Grounding SalBench (CG-SalBench), based on the SalBench dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that the ForeSight-7B model significantly outperforms other models with the same parameter scale, and even surpasses the current SOTA closed-source models on certain metrics.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models leverage the rich world knowledge of pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) to enable instruction-following robotic manipulation. However, the structural mismatch between VLM semantic spaces and embodied control policies often hinders the learning of precise perception--action mappings. To address this challenge, we propose \textbf{AffordanceVLA}, a unified framework that introduces structured affordance forecasting as a task-oriented intermediate representation to establish a more precise and robust perception--action mapping. Specifically, we progressively model manipulation priors through three complementary components: 1) \textbf{Which2Act} for object-centric grounding via visual latent prediction to suppress distractions; 2) \textbf{Where2Act} for 2D interaction localization via affordance map estimation; and 3) \textbf{How2Act} for 3D geometric reasoning to guide manipulation policies. These affordance cues provide spatially grounded, semantically conditioned, and action-coupled intermediate representations, thereby naturally bridging vision, language and action. We integrate these modules into a Mixture-of-Transformer (MoT) architecture with specialized experts and train the model using a three-stage training strategy with a progressive data curriculum. To overcome the scarcity of dense affordance labels in robotic datasets, we also develop a robust automated data augmentation pipeline. Extensive experiments on simulation and real-world demonstrate that AffordanceVLA achieves strong performance across diverse manipulation scenarios.