Regime-Conditioned Evaluation in Multi-Context Bayesian Optimization

Noel Thomas

cs.LGMay 6, 2026

Regime-Conditioned Evaluation in Multi-Context Bayesian Optimization

Authors: Noel Thomas

Organizations: Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence Abu Dhabi, UAE

Abstract

Published transfer-BO comparisons often estimate an average treatment effect of acquisition choice over hidden regime variables, while practitioners need the conditional effect for their specific prior quality, budget ratio, and metric. An audit of 40 transfer-BO papers from NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AISTATS, UAI, TMLR, JMLR, and AutoML-Conf (2022-2025) finds that 98% never vary B/|A| as a controlled axis. On the same GDSC2 benchmark, changing only the budget reverses the ranking: at B=50, Greedy outperforms UCB by 0.050 Hit@1, while at B=100, UCB outperforms Greedy by 0.035. We capture this transition with the Portable Regime Score PRS=(B/|A|)(1-rho), where rho is the prior rank correlation and can be estimated from pilot contexts before the main comparison. Across 79 conditions spanning chemistry, drug-response biology, and HPO, a hierarchical model gives beta=0.50 (p=1.1e-9), and 19% of conditions fall in an equivalence zone where |advantage|<0.01 Hit@1. In five published reversal cases, PRS predicts the winner from pre-comparison observables. A No-Free-Leaderboard proposition explains why unconditional rankings are unstable: when CATE changes sign across regimes, the reported ATE becomes a function of benchmark mixture. RegimePlanner, which estimates rho online and switches acquisition accordingly, wins all 16 HPO-B search spaces at B=100 and exceeds the matched {Greedy,UCB} per-context oracle on GDSC2 by 18%. Pre-registered predictions achieve 27/40=67.5% overall accuracy and above 90% within EMA prior families. The practical protocol is simple: report B/|A|, rho, K, and metric alongside any claimed acquisition advantage.

Explore similar work

Sep 21, 2026stat.ML

Causal Bayesian Optimization: Foundations, Methods, and Applications

Causal Bayesian Optimization (CBO) combines causal inference with Bayesian optimization to enable sample-efficient intervention selection in systems with causal structure. This survey provides a systematic review of CBO through a unified BO-loop perspective, showing how causal assumptions shape intervention search spaces, surrogate models, acquisition functions, and decision policies. We organize existing methods by graph and system-knowledge assumptions, environment, intervention representation, surrogate architecture, and decision rule, and connect CBO to causal bandits, Bayesian experimental design, safe optimization, policy search, and causal abstraction. We also introduce a reproducibility-oriented benchmark spanning hard- and soft-intervention settings, with standardized GAP and a new trajectory-aware Path-Aware GAP (PA-GAP), evaluating seven CBO methods and a non-causal BO baseline across thirteen datasets, three budgets, and two metrics. Results show that no method dominates uniformly: rankings depend on dataset, budget, metric, and how causal information is used, while strong non-causal baselines remain competitive in several settings. Controlled graph-misspecification and omitted-variable stress tests further show that rankings can change substantially when learner-side causal information is perturbed. We conclude by identifying key open challenges, including robustness to causal-assumption violations, scalable unknown-graph optimization, mixed intervention types, realistic cost models, stronger theoretical guarantees, and integration with modern representation learning and causal abstractions.

Chenfeng Huang, Thuy T. Le, Zixuan Ma +1

Bayesian Optimization

Ask PDF

Aug 8, 2026cs.LG

Adaptive KappaSharp: Condition-Number Shaping for Preferential Bayesian Optimization

Preferential Bayesian optimization (PBO) optimizes objectives accessible only through pairwise user comparisons. The standard approach fits a Gaussian process surrogate for observed pairwise comparisons (PairwiseGP) using the Laplace approximation and selects queries with the Expected Utility of Best Option (EUBO) acquisition function. EUBO queries new candidates at each step, producing pairs that share no candidates with previous queries. Each such pair forms an isolated component in the comparison graph, removing one degree of freedom from the likelihood Hessian and making it rank-deficient. This deficiency is structural and cannot be resolved by changing the surrogate modeling approach. Existing approaches to remedy this issue either waste query budget by forcing comparisons to stay connected, or apply uniform regularization that also perturbs directions already well-constrained by the observed comparisons. We propose KappaSharp that enables a diagonal correction to the Hessian to reduce its condition number, with larger corrections where the prior uncertainty is higher. The correction is only applied in the model fitting step, not query selection. An adaptive variant of KappaSharp is also presented that activates the correction only when the surrogate is confident about recent comparisons, avoiding unnecessary corrections when the problem is well-conditioned. On 11 benchmarks (5--20 dimensions), including a 16-dimensional controller tuning problem in plasma medicine, Adaptive KappaSharp outperforms the standard PBO baseline, with up to +10.9% (

p{=}0.003

Ketong Shao, Jialu Wang, Xuekai Pei +1

Bayesian Optimization Bayesian Condition Number

Ask PDF

Feb 26, 2025cs.LG

Bayesian Optimization for General Reaction Conditions

General chemical reaction conditions that achieve consistently high performance across multiple substrates are important for practical applications such as library synthesis and high-throughput experimentation. However, identifying such conditions efficiently has been a longstanding challenge, as it requires decision making under uncertainty with respect to both conditions and substrates, while minimizing the number of required experiments. Here, we introduce CurryBO, a high-level framework for generality-oriented optimization. By formalizing the problem as Bayesian optimization over curried functions, CurryBO provides a unified framework that accommodates different generality definitions (e.g., mean yield across substrates), and supports a range of substrate and condition selection strategies. We evaluate this framework on four benchmark tasks in experimental reaction optimization, and systematically analyze key algorithmic components. Our results show that efficient experiment planning can be achieved by emphasizing exploration when selecting reaction conditions, followed by the uncertainty-guided prioritization of substrates in a sequential decison-making scheme. Based on these insights, we design and validate an optimization policy that substantially improves sample efficiency relative to previously reported approaches across all benchmarks. Overall, the flexibility and modularity of CurryBO facilitate the integration of generality-oriented optimization into experimental settings, enabling more efficient identification of solutions that perform robustly across diverse tasks.

Stefan P. Schmid, Ella Miray Rajaonson, Cher Tian Ser +6

Bayesian Optimization Prompt Optimization Reaction

Ask PDF