Despite theoretical advantages, causal methods for Gene Regulatory Network (GRN) inference from single-cell RNA-seq data consistently fail to match or outperform correlation-based baselines in many realistic benchmarks, a persistent puzzle which casts doubt on the value of causality for this task. We argue that existing benchmarks are insufficiently controlled to answer this question because they evaluate on real or semi-real data where multiple pathologies co-occur, confounding failure modes, and obscuring the specific conditions under which different inference methods excel or fail. To address this gap, we introduce a controlled diagnostic framework that isolates seven biologically motivated pathologies (dropout, latent confounders, cell-type mixing, feedback loops, network density, sample size, and pseudotime drift) and measure how six representative methods spanning three inference paradigms degrade as each pathology intensifies. Across 6,120 controlled experiments, we find that causal methods genuinely dominate in clean and structurally favorable regimes, but specific pathologies (notably dropout and latent confounders) selectively neutralize their advantages. We further introduce an error-type decomposition that reveals methods with similar aggregate accuracy commit qualitatively different errors. To probe whether single-pathology effects persist when multiple stressors co-occur, we perform an interaction sweep over the three most impactful pathologies and find that their joint effects are sub-additive, while also exposing density-conditional cross-overs invisible to single-dial analysis. Our findings offer a nuanced understanding of when and why different methods succeed or fail for GRN inference, providing actionable insights for method development and practical guidance for practitioners.
Inferring gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from single-cell transcriptomic data is crucial for biological discovery, yet existing approaches suffer from a fundamental misalignment with real-world needs. Researchers typically seek a small set of high-confidence regulatory interactions for experimental validation, often involving previously unseen genes. However, current benchmarks rely on transductive splits with global classification metrics, while prevailing models struggle to generalize under inductive settings. To bridge this gap, we reformulate GRN inference as an inductive, ranking-centric graph completion problem and introduce \textbf{\benchmark}, a new benchmark that incorporates an inductive gene-holdout split together with knowledge graph completion metrics to better evaluate top-ranked predictions. Building on this, we propose \textbf{\method}, the first co-evolutionary discrete diffusion framework that jointly models biologically coherent discretized gene expression states and regulatory interactions for robust inductive generalization and improved top-ranked regulatory discovery. We further introduce TF-ALL Subgraph Sampling (TASS) for scalable training. Extensive experiments on {\benchmark} show that {\method} establishes new state-of-the-art performance, significantly outperforming existing methods in novel regulatory discovery, and ablation studies further verify the effectiveness of our design.
Gene Regulatory Network (GRN) inference is essential for understanding complex cellular mechanisms, rendered tractable through single-cell transcriptomic data. With the emergence of single-cell Foundation Models (scFMs), enhanced transcriptomic encoding is widely expected to revolutionize GRN inference. However, we observe that their performance remains far from satisfactory. The primary reason is that the standard reconstruction-based pre-training objectives often fail to explicitly capture latent regulatory signals. To bridge this gap, we first introduce a GRN generalization benchmark designed to evaluate regulatory predictions on unseen genes and datasets, which relies on the zero-shot capabilities of scFMs and is inherently challenging for traditional methods. Furthermore, to unlock the regulatory knowledge within the foundation models, we propose two novel methods, Virtual Value Perturbation and Gradient Trajectory, to distill implicit regulatory information from scFMs into highly generalizable inter-gene features. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms existing methods, establishing a new paradigm for leveraging the potential of scFMs in universal GRN inference.
Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) capture transcription factor-target interactions and are central to understanding cell-state regulation and disease. Reconstructing GRNs from paired single-cell transcriptomic and chromatin accessibility data is promising but challenging: scATAC is extremely sparse, and most methods rely on fixed peak-to-gene links and weak supervision. We present EpiAwareNet, a prior-guided multi-omic Transformer framework that reconstructs GRNs from paired single-cell data using only lightweight biological priors. In Stage 1, EpiAwareNet learns joint gene-peak representations with a gene-peak cross-attention module, enabling data-driven, gene-specific aggregation of accessibility signals rather than hard-coded peak-to-gene assignments. In Stage 2, EpiAwareNet incorporates a bulk-derived GRN prior as noisy positive edges to provide weak supervision under label scarcity, refining regulatory scores while remaining robust to prior noise. In our experiments, EpiAwareNet improves GRN reconstruction over representative single- and multi-omic baselines and yields GRNs with greater biological plausibility, such as improved recovery of known regulatory interactions, suggesting that lightweight biological priors from bulk data can effectively guide single-cell GRN inference when combined with adaptive cross-modal representation learning. Code and data will be available at https://github.com/tianyang-x/EpiAwareNet_pub.