cs.LGMay 7, 2026

A Fine-Grained Understanding of Uniform Convergence for Halfspaces

Authors: Aryeh KontorovichKasper Green Larsen

Organizations: Ben-Gurion University · Aarhus University

Abstract

We study the fine-grained uniform convergence behavior of halfspaces beyond worst-case VC bounds. For inhomogeneous halfspaces in Rd\mathbb{R}^d with d2d\ge 2, we show that standard first-order VC bounds are essentially tight: even consistent hypotheses can incur population error Θ(dln(n/d)/n)Θ(d\ln(n/d)/n), and in the agnostic setting the deviation scales as τln(1/τ)\sqrt{τ\ln(1/τ)} at true error ττ. In contrast, homogeneous halfspaces in R2\mathbb{R}^2 exhibit a markedly different behavior. In the realizable case, every hypothesis consistent with the sample has error O(1/n)O(1/n). In the agnostic case, we prove a bandwise, log-free deviation bound on each dyadic risk band via a critical-wedge localization argument. Unioning over bands incurs only a lnlnn\ln\ln n overhead, and we establish a matching lower bound showing this overhead is unavoidable. Together, these results give a fine-grained and nearly complete picture of uniform convergence for halfspaces, revealing sharp dimensional and structural thresholds.

Explore similar work

May 26, 2026cs.DS

Proper Agnostic Learning of Functions of Halfspaces under Gaussian Marginals

We study the problem of computationally efficient proper agnostic learning of multidimensional concept classes under the Gaussian distribution. In this setting, given i.i.d. labeled samples from an unknown distribution over Rd×{±1}\mathbb{R}^d \times \{\pm 1\} whose marginal on Rd\mathbb{R}^d is Gaussian, the goal is to output a hypothesis from a target class F\mathcal{F} whose 0-1 loss is within εε of that of the best classifier in F\mathcal{F}. We give the first efficient proper agnostic learning algorithm for arbitrary Boolean functions of KK halfspaces under Gaussian marginals. Our algorithm runs in time dO(K2log(1/ε)/ε2)+(K/ε)O(K3/ε2.5)d^{O(K^2 \log(1/ε)/ε^2)} + (K/ε)^{O(K^3/ε^{2.5})}. Prior to our work, the only known algorithm for K2K \geq 2 was brute-force search, with run-time exponential in dd. Moreover, the dependence of our run-time on the dimension dd matches that of the best known improper learning algorithm, namely dO~(K2/ε2)d^{\widetilde{O}(K^2/ε^2)}. For the special case of a single halfspace (K=1K=1), the best previous run-time was dO(1/ε4)+(1/ε)O(1/ε6)d^{O(1/ε^4)} + (1/ε)^{O(1/ε^6)}. Our algorithm improves this to dO(1/ε2)+(1/ε)O(1/ε2.5)d^{O(1/ε^2)} + (1/ε)^{O(1/ε^{2.5})}. Once again, the dependence on dd matches that of the best known improper algorithm, namely dO(1/ε2)d^{O(1/ε^2)}. Furthermore, the dependence of our run-time on the dimension dd is essentially optimal in the statistical query model.
Sergei Tikhonov, Arsen Vasilyan
May 4, 2026cs.LG

A Near-optimal SQ Lower Bound for Smoothed Agnostic Learning of Boolean Halfspaces

We study the complexity of smoothed agnostic learning of halfspaces on {±1}n\{\pm 1\}^n under uniform marginals in the model of~\cite{KM25}, where each input coordinate is independently flipped with probability σ(0,1/2)σ\in (0, {1}/{2}). We show that L1L^1 polynomial regression achieves runtime and sample complexity O~(nO(log(1/ε)/σ))\tilde{O}(n^{O(\log(1/\varepsilon)/σ)}), and prove a nearly matching Statistical Query complexity lower bound of nΩ(log(1+σ/ε2)/σ)n^{Ω(\log(1+σ/\varepsilon^2)/σ)}. This complements the recent work of~\cite{DK26}, which established analogous bounds in the continuous setting under Gaussian marginals.
Tim Sinen
May 13, 2026cs.LG

Scale-Sensitive Shattering: Learnability and Evaluability at Optimal Scale

We study the optimal scale at which real-valued function classes exhibit uniform convergence and learnability. Our main result establishes a scale-sensitive generalization of the fundamental theorem of PAC learning: for every bounded real-valued class and every γ>0γ>0, uniform convergence at scale γγ, agnostic learnability at scale γ/2γ/2, and finiteness of the fat-shattering dimension at every scale γ>γγ'>γ are equivalent. This resolves a question by Anthony and Bartlett (Cambridge Univ. Press 1999) on the precise scales governing learnability, refuting a conjecture attributed there to Phil Long that a multiplicative 2-factor gap is unavoidable, and improves the upper bounds of Bartlett and Long (JCSS 1998), which incur such a loss. The key technical ingredient is a direct bound on empirical \ell_\infty covering numbers, avoiding the standard detour through packing numbers. As a consequence, we obtain sharp asymptotic metric-entropy bounds in terms of the fat-shattering scale γγ: an O(log2n)O(\log^2 n) bound holds already at scale γ/2γ/2, while an O(logn)O(\log n) bound holds at scale 2γ. We further show that the O(log2n)O(\log^2 n) bound is sometimes tight. These results resolve open questions by Alon et al. (JACM 1997) and Rudelson and Vershynin (Ann. of Math. 2006). As an application, we establish a sharp dichotomy for bounded integral probability metrics: every such IPM is either estimable or cannot be weakly evaluated within any multiplicative factor c<3c<3, while 33-weak evaluability always holds, resolving an open question from Aiyer et al. (ICML 2026). We also highlight several open questions on quantitative sample complexity and evaluability.
Shashaank Aiyer, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran +2