Accelerated Relax-and-Round for Concave Coverage Problems

Pareto optimization via evolutionary multi-objective algorithms has been shown to efficiently solve constrained monotone submodular functions. Traditionally when solving multiple problems, the algorithm is run for each problem separately. We introduce multitasking formulations of these problems that are an effective way to solve multiple related problems with a single run. In our setting the given problems share a monotone submodular function $f$ but have different knapsack constraints. We examine the case where elements within a constraint have the same cost and show that our multitasking formulations result in small Pareto fronts. This allows the population to share solutions between all problems leading to significant improvements compared to running several classical approaches independently. Using rigorous runtime analysis, we analyze the expected time until the introduced multitasking approaches obtain a $(1-1/e)$-approximation for each of the given problems. Our experimental investigations for the maximum coverage problem give further insight into the dynamics behind how the approach works and doesn't work in practice for problems where elements within a constraint also have varied costs.

This work considers a number of optimization problems and reductive relations between them. The two main problems we are interested in are the Optimal Decision Tree and Set Cover. We study these two fundamental tasks under precedence constraints, that is, if a test (or set) $X$ is a predecessor of $Y$, then in any feasible decision tree $X$ needs to be an ancestor of $Y$ (or respectively, if $Y$ is added to set cover, then so must be $X$). For the Optimal Decision Tree we consider two optimization criteria: worst case identification time (height of the tree) or the average identification time. Similarly, for the Set Cover we study two cost measures: the size of the cover or the average cover time. Our approach is to develop a number of algorithmic reductions, where an approximation algorithm for one problem provides an approximation for another via a black-box usage of a procedure for the former. En route we introduce other optimization problems either to complete the `reduction landscape' or because they hold the essence of combinatorial structure of our problems. The latter is brought by a problem of finding a Maximum Density Precedence-Closed Subfamily, where the density is defined as the ratio of the number of items the family covers to its size. We provide $\mathcal{O}^*(\sqrt{m})$-approximation polynomial-time algorithms for all aforementioned problems. The picture is complemented by a number of hardness reductions that provide $\mathcal{O}(m^{1/12-ε})$-inapproximability results for the decision tree and covering problems. Besides giving a complete set of results for general precedence constraints, we also provide polylogarithmic approximation guarantees for two most typically studied and applicable graph types, outforests and inforests. By providing corresponding hardness results, we show most of these results to be tight.

We study optimal policy learning under combined budget and minimum coverage constraints. We show that the problem admits a knapsack-type structure and that the optimal policy can be characterized by an affine threshold rule involving both budget and coverage shadow prices. We establish that the linear programming relaxation of the combinatorial solution has an O(1) integrality gap, implying asymptotic equivalence with the optimal discrete allocation. Building on this result, we analyze two implementable approaches: a Greedy-Lagrangian (GLC) and a rank-and-cut (RC) algorithm. We show that the GLC closely approximates the optimal solution and achieves near-optimal performance in finite samples. By contrast, RC is approximately optimal whenever the coverage constraint is slack or costs are homogeneous, while misallocation arises only when cost heterogeneity interacts with a binding coverage constraint. Monte Carlo evidence supports these findings.