Dual-Agent Co-Training for Health Coaching via Implicit Adversarial Preference Optimization
Authors: Da Long, Lingyi Fu, Diya Michelle Rao, Jasmine Ruales Carrera, Yang Bai, Shandian Zhe
Abstract
Motivational-interviewing-based health coaching is an effective approach for improving mental health and promoting healthy behavior change. However, the scarcity of trained human coaches and the high cost of coaching services make such support inaccessible to many people who could benefit from it. This motivates the development of AI health coaches that can provide scalable and affordable support. Existing methods typically optimize only one side of the interaction: they either train a dialogue agent against a fixed client environment or train a client simulator against a fixed assistant. This one-sided setup can limit exploration of the interaction space and may be inefficient at developing the capabilities required by the target agent and pushing its performance boundaries. In this paper, we propose a dual-agent framework that interactively co-trains both the health coach agent and the client simulator. The coach is optimized with DPO using Pareto-dominant response pairs identified by a multi-dimensional LLM judge. In turn, the client is trained adversarially by reversing these preferences, inducing an implicit adversarial training dynamic. We further show that this co-training process admits a natural stochastic-game interpretation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method effectively improves coaching quality across several important dimensions.
AI copilots can substantially boost human performance through shared control, but excessive assistance can induce over-reliance and skill atrophy. This paper studies how an embodied AI agent can act as a coach that accelerates human motor-skill development. We argue that effective coaching requires strategic scaffolding and stepping back that are aligned with the learner's capability, allowing productive failures that drive learning. We formalize the interactive AI coaching process as a non-cooperative dynamic game in which the learner optimizes task performance while the coach targets the learner's independent competence. Building on this formalism, we develop a reinforcement learning framework combining adaptive shared control with probabilistic models of the coach's causal influence on skill evolution, enabling tractable training of coaching policies. A comprehensive user study (N=33) on first-person-view drone racing shows significant gains in human learning outcomes over state-of-the-art AI coaching baselines.
Modern language agents which perform multi-step reasoning have shown strong performance in knowledge-intensive question answering. However, existing approaches typically couple evidence acquisition and answer generation within a single policy. This forces a single model to play multiple potentially conflicting roles, inducing a combinatorial explosion in the policy space and hindering efficient exploration. It also introduces a credit assignment problem during training: a search action that retrieves sufficient evidence may still be penalized when generation fails, and vice versa. We propose DAC (Divide and Cooperate), a role-decomposed multi-agent training framework that divides agentic search into two cooperative subtasks, each handled by a dedicated agent trained with role-specific learning signals. The generator serves a dual role as both an answer producer and an evidence sufficiency verifier, abstaining when retrieved evidence is insufficient. This abstention signal is incorporated into the search agent's reward, providing structured cross-agent learning signals that improve credit assignment. Conversely, the searcher exposes the generator to diverse and challenging evidence environments by hard-positive evidence augmentation, improving its robustness. Experiments on general and multi-hop QA benchmarks show that DAC, implemented via parameter-efficient LoRA modules over a shared backbone, achieves strong performance against prior baselines that rely on full fine-tuning of monolithic models.
Agents are increasingly capable of automating software tasks, but can they teach humans how to use software themselves? We introduce DigitalCoach, a multimodal dataset of 72 human expert-novice computer use coaching sessions consisting of 22,752 dialogue turns grounded in 28.1 hours of screen and input event recordings across five software applications. We use DigitalCoach to evaluate whether state-of-the-art models can teach humans how to use computers. Automated evaluation shows that models differ from humans in how they coach: models provide more direct instructions, but fewer explanations, error diagnoses, and knowledge-check questions. When we fix the coaching method, models produce utterances similar to human references yet poorly grounded in visual context. Interactive evaluation confirms that model coaches cause learners to passively follow instructions without deeper engagement and fall short in visual grounding. DigitalCoach lays a foundation for collaborative and proactive computer use coaching agents. Data and code are available at https://project-digital-coach.vercel.app.