Authors: Emil Carlsson, Newton Mwai, Fredrik D. Johansson
Organizations: Sleep Cycle AB · Chalmers University of Technology & University of Gothenburg
Abstract
Bandit algorithms solve diverse sequential decision-making problems, but are often too sample-inefficient for from-scratch personalization. To substantially reduce exploration times, latent bandit algorithms exploit cross-instance structure implied by discrete latent states, provided that the posterior distribution of rewards and latent states is known and accurate. However, obtaining an accurate model of this structure is difficult, and a small number of latent states may be insufficient to characterize the reward distributions in all problem instances. We propose latent order bandits (LOB), relaxing the assumptions of latent bandits to require only prior knowledge of a partial order of action preferences in each state. This allows instances of the same state to vary in reward distributions, as long as the partial order of actions is shared. For example, groups of users on a streaming service may agree on which movie genres are the best but rate experiences on different scales. We give an upper-confidence bound procedure for the LOB problem, applicable to both total and partial latent orders, and give an upper bound on its regret. To improve empirical performance, we propose a posterior-sampling algorithm and show, in a suite of experiments, that both are competitive with full-prior latent bandits when same-state instances share reward parameters, and preferable to them when reward scales differ between instances with the same latent state.
The stochastic linear bandit, where actions are represented as vectors and rewards are linear, is a central paradigm for sequential decision making. We study a partially observed variant of this problem in which the learning agent only sees a random subset of coordinates for each action. Such partial observability arises naturally in settings like recommendation and healthcare, where full action descriptions can be expensive or even impossible to obtain. In general, this makes sublinear regret information-theoretically impossible. However, we show that this barrier can be overcome when the action vectors have low intrinsic dimension. We propose an algorithm, TOFU-POV, that estimates the latent action subspace using the masked actions, imputes current actions using an epoch-wise frozen representation, and runs OFUL in the resulting low-dimensional coordinates. Our theory shows that TOFU-POV enjoys a T regret that scales with the intrinsic action subspace dimension as opposed to the ambient dimension and quantifies the interaction between these quantities and the missingness, decision set size, and subspace conditioning. We also devise a rank-adaptive algorithm that does not require the knowledge of the intrinsic dimension. We complement these guarantees with a lower bound based on a novel product construction that separates usual reward-learning uncertainty from a missingness-dependent cost intrinsic to partial observation. Synthetic and real data experiments support our theory and show that TOFU-POV can substantially improve upon natural baselines in this challenging problem.
We consider online learning problems under a partial observability model capturing situations where the information conveyed to the learner is between full information and bandit feedback. In the simplest variant, we assume that in addition to its own loss, the learner also gets to observe losses of some other actions. The revealed losses depend on the learner's action and a directed observation system chosen by the environment. For this setting, we propose the first algorithm that enjoys near-optimal regret guarantees without having to know the observation system before selecting its actions. Along similar lines, we also define a new partial information setting that models online combinatorial optimization problems where the feedback received by the learner is between semi-bandit and full feedback. As the predictions of our first algorithm cannot be always computed efficiently in this setting, we propose another algorithm with similar properties and with the benefit of always being computationally efficient, at the price of a slightly more complicated tuning mechanism. Both algorithms rely on a novel exploration strategy called implicit exploration, which is shown to be more efficient both computationally and information-theoretically than previously studied exploration strategies for the problem.
Bandit algorithms generate data for downstream inference, but adaptive sampling biases post-bandit sample means. We analyze this bias for stable index algorithms, including UCB1 and its generalizations, and derive sharp leading-order expressions for the sample-mean bias and expected Z-statistic. Our characterization reveals the algorithmic origin of bias through a key index-function-dependent quantity, which we term effective exploration rate. For example, under UCB1, the effective exploration rate is of order logT, and the standardized bias of any arm (that is not uniquely optimal) decays at the extremely slow rate 1/logT. We also show how the choice of the index function affects both regret and bias, which reveals a regret-bias trade-off: more exploratory algorithm reduces bias but increases regret. Our sharp characterization for bias uses a novel empirical fluid approximation of the algorithm's sampling dynamics, which may be of independent interest.