Learning Minimal-Deviation Corrections for Multi-Dimensional Mismodelling in HEP Simulations

Simulating the ALICE Zero Degree Calorimeter (ZDC) neutron detector responses at the LHC is computationally expensive, requiring complex Monte Carlo chains. We develop a generative surrogate, focusing on Normalizing Flows (NFs). Through transfer learning, we pre-train on the full imbalanced dataset and fine-tune specialized models for different particle types ($γ$, $n$, $Λ$, $K_S^0$, $Σ^+$) using two gradual-unfreezing schemes. As standard ZDC metrics like Wasserstein distance overlook conditional structure, we introduce refined metrics: conditional weighted MAE, dispersion ratio, and Jaccard co-activation error, that better capture physics-relevant input-output dependencies and response variability. Our ensemble of fine-tuned models achieves a Wasserstein distance of $1.61 \pm 0.02$, outperforming baselines across all metrics. This work provides a generalizable NF-based framework for LHC detector simulation, combining NFs, conditional fine-tuning, and physics-motivated evaluation.

Neural networks (NNs) are inherently multidimensional classifiers that learn complex, non-linear relationships among input observables. While their flexibility enables unprecedented performance in high-energy physics (HEP) analyses, it also makes them sensitive to small variations in their inputs. Consequently, the propagation and estimation of systematic uncertainties in NN-based models remain an open challenge. There are indications that uncertainties derived in control regions or from nominal variations of input features can underestimate the true model uncertainty, potentially leaving biases unaccounted for. Inspired by insights from adversarial-attack studies in machine learning, we explore how subtle perturbations, fully consistent with the experimental uncertainties on the input observables, can lead to substantial changes in NN outputs, while keeping the one-dimensional and correlated input distributions nearly unchanged. Using a set of representative HEP tasks, including event classification and object identification, and testing across a variety of network architectures, we demonstrate that networks can be systematically "fooled" at significant rates within the allowed uncertainty envelopes. Building on this observation, we introduce a quantitative framework to probe and measure the hidden sensitivity of neural networks to realistic experimental variations, providing a practical path to evaluate and control their systematic uncertainty in physics analyses.

Machine-learning models in high-energy physics are often trained on simulated data, where fully simulated samples are computationally expensive while fast simulation provides large statistics at reduced realism. In this work, we systematically study transfer learning between fast-simulated and fully simulated datasets in a realistic LHC environment. We consider three representative tasks, signal-background classification, quark-gluon jet tagging, and missing transverse energy reconstruction, using dense neural networks, graph neural networks, and transformer-based architectures. Models are pretrained on ATLAS-like fast simulation and adapted to CMS-like fast simulation and to fully simulated ATLAS Open Data. Across all tasks, pretrained models consistently outperform independently trained baselines and require significantly less target-domain training data, typically reducing the needed statistics by about a factor of two. These results demonstrate that fast simulation can be used to learn robust, reusable representations and motivate publishing trained models as reusable scientific assets beyond large foundation models.