CommandSwarm: Safety-Aware Natural Language-to-Behavior-Tree Generation for Robotic Swarms

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed to orchestrate robot behavior through natural-language interfaces, yet no benchmark exists to evaluate their reliability as safety-aware decision makers in human-humanoid collaboration. Unlike deterministic safety systems that enforce binary allow/deny decisions, LLM-based orchestrators exhibit a compliance spectrum ranging from overcompliance (refusing safe actions) to full safety violations. This paper introduces the first safety benchmarking environment for LLM orchestrators in human-humanoid collaboration, built on a Model Context Protocol (MCP)-based architecture with safety invariants grounded in ISO 10218-2:2025 protective measures. The benchmark defines five testable safety invariants, a four-level compliance taxonomy (correct compliance, overcompliance, undercompliance, full violation), and a three-layer evaluation pipeline (text prompting, simulated sensor-actuator loops, and physical validation on a Unitree G1 EDU humanoid). We report Layer-1 results: three cloud backends (Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-4o-mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash) and a local open-weights baseline (qwen3:8b) across 40 100-turn sessions under full-context and sliding-window budget conditions, while the simulation and physical layers remain ongoing. We find that (1) model family determines the safety floor, as Claude and Gemini remain at or near zero violations while GPT-4o-mini commits up to 13 per session, (2) context management dissociates two failure axes, reducing mean behavioral issues by 42-57% for every cloud backend while nearly doubling GPT-4o-mini's violations (3.8 to 7.2 per session), and (3) proportional compliance, clamping movement speed to the rule-specified maximum rather than refusing, emerges consistently only in Gemini; the preliminary simulation layer reproduces the model ranking and the GPT-4o-mini failure-mode inversion.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly explored as high-level reasoning engines for cyber-physical systems, yet their application to real-time UAV swarm management remains challenging due to heterogeneous interfaces, limited grounding, and the need for long-running closed-loop execution. This paper presents a mission-agnostic, agent-enhanced LLM framework for UAV swarm control, where users express mission objectives in natural language and the system autonomously executes them through grounded, real-time interactions. The proposed architecture combines an LLM-based Agent Core with a Model Context Protocol (MCP) gateway and a Web-of-Drones abstraction based on W3C Web of Things (WoT) standards. By exposing drones, sensors, and services as standardized WoT Things, the framework enables structured tool-based interaction, continuous state observation, and safe actuation without relying on code generation. We evaluate the framework using ArduPilot-based simulation across four swarm missions and six state-of-the-art LLMs. Results show that, despite strong reasoning abilities, current general-purpose LLMs still struggle to achieve reliable execution - even for simple swarm tasks - when operating without explicit grounding and execution support. Task-specific planning tools and runtime guardrails substantially improve robustness, while token consumption alone is not indicative of execution quality or reliability.

As autonomous driving systems move toward real-world deployment, interpretable, behavior-level decision-making is essential for safety, trust, and regulation. We introduce CommandLM, a multimodal large language model that generates concise, human-readable behavior descriptions for ego vehicles from fused multi-sensor data. Our model processes temporally fused bird's-eye view representations from LiDAR and multi-camera inputs via a Q-Former adapter connected to a quantized, LoRA-fine-tuned large language model. Trained on our CommandLM-nuScenes dataset, CommandLM produces intent-aware, interpretable captions suitable for planner supervision and safety auditing. Experiments demonstrate strong linguistic and behavioral alignment, achieving CIDEr 0.67, and BERT-F1 0.88, substantially outperforming the BLIP-2 baseline (CIDEr 0.52, BERT-F1 0.86). In human evaluation, 58% of the generated descriptions were rated accurate, efficient and rule-compliant, confirming their real-world plausibility. While the remaining descriptions may not always select the most efficient, goal-oriented behavior, CommandLM's interpretable outputs enable downstream validation systems to identify and correct such cases, making it an effective tool for transparent behavior auditing. These results show that integrating multimodal fusion with language reasoning yields efficient and transparent behavior-level understanding for autonomous driving. We release our code and dataset at: https://github.com/b-tok/CommandLM