CellDX AI Autopilot: Agent-Guided Training and Deployment of Pathology Classifiers

Computational pathology has advanced rapidly with the emergence of foundation models, yet widespread adoption remains limited by substantial technical complexity and programming requirements. Here we present PathLab, an autonomous agentic framework that translates natural-language research objectives into executable and validated computational pathology workflows through the structured composition of domain-specific skills and tools. By organizing workflow generation around reusable methodological modules, including data preprocessing, model development, evaluation and interpretation, PathLab enables studies to be specified at the level of scientific intent rather than implementation details. We evaluated PathLab across 12 public datasets spanning four representative task families: region-of-interest classification, whole-slide image classification, segmentation and survival prediction. Across all task categories, PathLab achieved non-inferior performance relative to expert implementations, while consistently enforcing semantic validity of user prompts and proactively rejecting incompatible workflow specifications prior to execution. In controlled user studies, PathLab substantially reduced the time required to generate executable analytical pipelines and enabled domain experts without programming experience to independently design, execute and evaluate computational pathology studies. Together, these results establish PathLab as a reliable interface between biomedical intent and computational execution, enabling computational pathology studies to be designed at the level of scientific questions rather than programming expertise. By lowering technical barriers to advanced AI methodologies, PathLab provides a foundation for the broader democratization of computational pathology.

Computational pathology requires visual representations that transfer across diverse clinical endpoints and remain robust to variation in magnification, staining, scanner type, slide preparation, and input resolution. We present DaX, a pathology vision foundation model that adapts DINOv3-style self-supervised learning to whole-slide histopathology. DaX is initialized from natural-image DINOv3 weights and incorporates continuous magnification training, cross-scale tissue views, orientation-agnostic and acquisition-robust augmentation, multi-input-size training, and Gram-anchored dense consistency. These designs aim to connect local cellular morphology with global tissue architecture while stabilizing dense token-level representations across input scales. We further construct a WSI-level benchmark comprising 161 clinically meaningful tasks from 44 public datasets, covering 28,182 patients and 34,394 slides across four clinical domains and nine task categories. All models are evaluated under a fixed patient-level cross-validation protocol with fold-level statistical ranking, enabling reproducible comparisons that are less sensitive to split-dependent variation. Across this benchmark, DaX achieves the highest mean performance across tasks and consistently strong task-level ranking scores, with gains spanning diagnostic pathology, biomarker and molecular profiling, tissue/specimen context, and risk, response, and prognosis. These results support DaX as a transferable visual encoder for computational pathology and provide a standardized evaluation framework for future pathology foundation models. Project page: https://alibaba-damo-academy.github.io/DaX/benchboard/.

Whole-slide image (WSI) diagnosis requires identifying diagnostically relevant regions, examining them across magnifications, and integrating multi-scale evidence. However, most existing pathology benchmarks evaluate models on pre-cropped patches or pre-extracted slide features, leaving their ability to acquire evidence directly from gigapixel WSIs largely untested. We introduce PathAgentBench, a benchmark for evaluating evidence-seeking vision-language models (VLMs) across four complementary capabilities: image-to-text matching for evidence interpretation, text-to-image retrieval for evidence verification, diagnostic-region localization for evidence acquisition, and multi-scale reasoning for evidence integration. The benchmark is organized as a diagnostic tree that links nested regions across magnifications with scale-specific findings and path-level diagnoses. It contains 1,822 TCGA WSIs and 17,135 diagnostic paths annotated by ten board-certified pathologists. An additional private cohort of 190 breast cancer WSIs with detailed annotations is used to evaluate autonomous whole-slide exploration. We evaluate 20 general-purpose, medical, and pathology-specialized models. Leading open-weight models achieve over 93% accuracy in multi-scale reasoning and over 50% accuracy in both cross-modal matching tasks. In contrast, diagnostic-region localization remains challenging: the best text-guided mean intersection-over-union is below 0.09, underperforming a simple center-based heuristic. During autonomous exploration, the unconditional hit rate decreases from 0.522 at low magnification to 0.185 at intermediate magnification and 0.020 at high magnification. These results reveal a pronounced gap between reasoning over curated evidence and acquiring that evidence directly from WSIs. PathAgentBench provides a unified framework for measuring and improving evidence-seeking pathology models.