physics.ao-phMay 6, 2026

Two Hebrew folk meteorological proverbs tested: rainfall on Rosh Chodesh and Shabbat Mevarechim as predictors of monthly precipitation (Israel, 1950-2024)

Authors: Abraham Itzhak Weinberg

Organizations: AI-WEINBERG, AI Experts [physics.ao-ph]

Abstract

Folk meteorological proverbs encode centuries of empirical observation by agricultural communities. Two Hebrew proverbs link lunar calendar anchor days to monthly winter rainfall: (i) "If Rosh Chodesh is rainy, the whole month is rainy" and (ii) "If it rains on Shabbat Mevarechim, the whole month is rainy." Shabbat Mevarechim is the last Saturday before each new Hebrew month, preceding Rosh Chodesh by one to seven days. The first proverb is widely known; the second circulates in Hasidic oral tradition with no identified written source. Both have never been formally tested. We analyse 75 years (1950-2024) of daily precipitation data from seven Israeli cities across three climatic regions, comprising 191,758 station-days and 2,422 Hebrew-month observations during the winter rainy season (Marcheshvan-Adar). A rainy Rosh Chodesh increases the probability of a rainy month from 22.2% to 38.6% (lift +16.4 percentage points; chi-square = 57.8, p = 2.9e-14; Bayes factor 1.81). A rainy Shabbat Mevarechim produces a similar effect (lift +16.5 percentage points, p = 8.0e-13), despite preceding Rosh Chodesh by up to seven days. The effect decays with lag and mirrors daily rainfall autocorrelation (r = 0.35-0.44 at lag 1; ~0 at lag 7), consistent with Mediterranean cyclone persistence. A bootstrap permutation test (p < 1e-4) and a 15-year rolling analysis show declining predictive power (-0.20 percentage points per year, p < 0.001), consistent with shortening precipitation events under warming climate conditions. Both proverbs encode real but probabilistic meteorological signals whose reliability is decreasing over time.

Explore similar work

May 17, 2026cs.CL

Temporal Decay of Co-Citation Predictability: A 20-Year Statute Retrieval Benchmark from 396M Ukrainian Court Citations

Co-citation structure is widely assumed to provide stable retrieval signal in legal information systems. We test this assumption longitudinally by constructing UA-StatuteRetrieval, a benchmark that measures co-citation predictability across 20 annual snapshots (2007-2026) of 396 million codex citations from 101 million Ukrainian court decisions. Using a leave-one-out protocol over the full bipartite citation graph, we find that Adamic-Adar MRR declines 33% on a fixed set of articles (from 0.43 to 0.29) and 47% under a train/test temporal split (from 0.51 to 0.27) confirming genuine temporal decay rather than compositional shift or evaluation artifact. The decay is non-uniform: criminal procedure maintains stable co-citation patterns (MRR ~0.40), while civil law degrades from 0.35 to 0.15, coinciding with the 2017 judicial reform. Hub articles (>100K citations) resist decay, but mid-frequency articles (1K-10K) -- the practical retrieval frontier lose half their predictability. A BM25 text baseline decays even faster (31%), and embedding drift analysis with E5-large reveals a 4.3% semantic shift in how articles are cited, providing a mechanistic explanation for the observed decay. The benchmark is released at https://huggingface.co/datasets/overthelex/ua-statute-retrieval.
Volodymyr Ovcharov
Jul 15, 2026cs.CL

Hindcast: Replaying Prediction Markets to Evaluate LLM Forecasters

Forecasters are evaluated by backtesting, which replays resolved questions and grades the probability the system would have assigned before the outcome was known. For LLMs, two channels leak the answer into this test. A model that retrieves can surface reports written after the event, turning forecasting into a lookup, and each new model is trained on data closer to the event, so a question that lay in the future for last year's models sits inside this year's training data. Either way, the test grades recall while claiming to grade foresight. We introduce Hindcast, which closes both leaks by grading a model as if it stood at a chosen past date t0t_0, before the outcome existed in either channel. Hindcast replays resolved Polymarket prediction markets against a frozen snapshot of public Reddit, lets the model read only posts written before t0t_0, and scores each forecast against both what happened and the market's own price at t0t_0, itself a human forecast made from the same past information. Because the cutoff is set per market and the snapshot never changes, the evaluation re-runs on new markets as models improve, without going stale. Once the leak is closed, retrieval still helps most models, but only where Reddit discussed the event beforehand. Where the archive carried only speculation, retrieval hurts.
Xiao Ye, Jacob Dineen, Evan Zhu +3
Jun 1, 2026cs.LG

AdaWeather: Adaptively Mixing Probabilistic Weather Forecasts with Logarithmic Regret

Recent advances in machine learning have produced probabilistic weather forecasting models comparable to state-of-the-art numerical weather predictors. But no model consistently dominates spatio-temporally, and relative performance is highly context-dependent. This motivates adaptive methods for combining multiple forecasts to obtain improvements and robustness. While combined forecasts have been proposed in the literature, these are achieved either through supervised learning or through prediction with expert advice methods. We introduce AdaWeather, an adaptive framework that combines many probabilistic forecasts using both machine learning as well as mixture of experts to arrive at a unified improved probabilistic forecast. While traditional expert methods develop the regret bounds with respect to the best single expert in hindsight, we extend the algorithm and analysis to show our method has logarithmic regret compared to the best static mixture of experts in hindsight. Empirically, we focus on forecasting temperature, and observe improvements over existing methods.
Saptarishi Dhanuka, Sarvesh Iyer, Manmeet Singh +5