Control of Fully Actuated Aerial Vehicles: A Comparison of Model-based and Sensor-based Dynamic Inversion
Authors: Ali Sidar Yilmaz, Buday Turan, Lukas Pries, Markus Ryll
Abstract
Fully actuated multirotor platforms decouple translational force generation from vehicle attitude, enabling independent control of position and orientation and shifting performance limitations from attitude authority to actuator dynamics and control effectiveness. This paper compares a model-based nonlinear dynamic inversion controller (geometric NDI) with a sensor-based incremental dynamic inversion controller (INDI) on a fixed-tilt fully actuated hexarotor. Both controllers share an identical outer-loop structure and are both executed at 500 Hz; therefore, performance differences can be attributed primarily to the inversion strategy. Controller performance is evaluated in five experiments covering attitude step tracking under nominal conditions and under a 50% mismatch in the rotor force coefficient, hover disturbance rejection under an external lateral load, waypoint tracking in the presence of wind gust disturbances, reduced control frequency, and injected sensor degradation. The results show that INDI offers clear advantages under parameter mismatch, gust disturbances, and sensor degradation, and maintains lower position errors across the controller-frequency sweep. However, its advantages are not universal: geometric NDI yields better attitude tracking at reduced control frequencies. To the authors' best knowledge, this work presents the first experimental validation of a full pose tracking INDI controller with decoupled translational and rotational dynamics. These findings highlight the trade-off between measurement-based and model-based inversion for robust control and rapid deployment of fully actuated UAVs.
This work presents a simulation-based comparative robustness analysis of Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion (INDI) and Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion augmented with a nonlinear disturbance observer (NDI+NDO) for fully actuated aerial robots. A systematic simulation campaign across representative operating scenarios is conducted, where we compare tracking performance, robustness, control effort, under parametric variations, external disturbances, and measurement noise. Results show that INDI demonstrates stronger robustness in several model-mismatch and combined-stress cases, while NDI+NDO primarily matches nominal performance but exhibits greater sensitivity under several non-ideal conditions. These findings provide practical guidance on the relative strengths and limitations of incremental and observer-based inversion strategies for aerial robotic applications.
Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion (INDI) is attractive for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flight control because it reduces dependence on a full aerodynamic model while retaining strong disturbance-rejection capability. For a tilt-rotor vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) architecture, however, the admissible model-mismatch range of the fast inner loop is still not characterized analytically in a parameter-explicit way. This paper isolates the pitch-rate/elevon subchannel of an existing cascaded INDI controller and studies its linear stability under model mismatch. A closed-form fifth-order transfer function is derived for the full controller-estimator-actuator-plant interconnection, and stability is characterized through the Routh-Hurwitz criterion over a parameterized linear model. Two representative three-parameter sweeps produce interpretable stability regions. Based on these feasibility maps, two uncertainty-aware tuning procedures are proposed: a robustness-oriented design that maximizes a weighted worst-case combination of gain margin and phase margin, and a performance-oriented design that maximizes worst-case closed-loop bandwidth subject to margin constraints. The results show that actuator lag and inertia mismatch are comparatively benign at nominal gain, whereas control-effectiveness mismatch, particularly a sign error in the allocation, is the most dangerous destabilizing factor, leading to concrete tuning recommendations for conservative and aggressive operating conditions.
Lorenzo Schenk, Guillaume Ducard, Christopher Onder
It has recently been shown that all physical parameters of an Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion (INDI) controller can be estimated onboard a multirotor within half a second, which is fast enough to do the full identification during a throw in the air. However, a robust method to tune outer loop gains for this feedback-linearizing INDI controller depending on the model parameters is still missing. This work presents the design of a robust gain-scheduled controller for attitude control of quadrotor, using an INDI-based inner loop with online identification of its system parameters. A gain-scheduled cascaded attitude controller with a feedforward filter is synthesized for a symmetric quadrotor using signal-based H∞ closed-loop shaping. The resulting controller exhibits good stability margins, with nonlinear simulations confirming effective tracking performance under uncertainty. Experimental evaluation is also conducted through flight tests with full online parameter identification. Even though the identified parameters during these tests are far outside the defined uncertainty range, acceptable flight performance comparable to simulation results is maintained for actuator time constants below 40 ms.