cs.AIMay 14, 2026

Stateful Reasoning via Insight Replay

Authors: Bin LeiCaiwen DingJiachen YangAng LiXin Eric Wang

Organizations: University of Minnesota · 2Simular AI

Abstract

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has become a foundation for eliciting multi-step reasoning in large language models, but recent studies show that its benefits do not scale monotonically with chain length: while longer CoT generally enables a model to tackle harder problems, on a given problem, accuracy typically increases with CoT length up to a point, after which it declines. We identify a major cause of this phenomenon: as the CoT grows, the model's attention to critical insights produced earlier in the trace gradually weakens, making those insights progressively less accessible when they are most needed. Therefore, we propose \textbf{InsightReplay}, a stateful reasoning approach in which the model periodically extracts critical insights from its reasoning trace and replays them near the active generation frontier, keeping them accessible as the reasoning scales. Extensive experiments on a 2 ⁣× ⁣3 ⁣× ⁣4\mathbf{2}\!\times\!\mathbf{3}\!\times\!\mathbf{4} benchmark grid, covering model scales {8B,30B}\{\text{8B}, \text{30B}\}, model families {Qwen3.5,DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen,Gemma-4}\{\text{Qwen3.5}, \text{DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen}, \text{Gemma-4}\}, and reasoning benchmarks {AIME,HMMT,GPQA Diamond,LiveCodeBench v5}\{\text{AIME}, \text{HMMT}, \text{GPQA Diamond}, \text{LiveCodeBench v5}\}, show that 3-round InsightReplay yields accuracy gains across \textbf{all 24 settings}, with an averaged improvement of +1.65\mathbf{+1.65} points over standard CoT, and a largest single-setting gain of +9.2\mathbf{+9.2} points on R1-Distill-32B's LiveCodeBench v5 subset. Our results suggest that the effectiveness of test-time scaling depends not only on how much a model reasons, but also on whether critical intermediate insights remain accessible throughout long reasoning trajectories.

Explore similar work

Jun 11, 2026cs.LG

Beyond the Commitment Boundary: Probing Epiphenomenal Chain-of-Thought in Large Reasoning Models

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is the dominant paradigm for inference-time scaling in language models, yet the causal influence of individual steps on the final answer poorly understood. We estimate each step's causal importance via early exit and use this measure to study how answers form across the reasoning traces of several model families. Across diverse tasks, we find that reasoning typically crosses a \emph{commitment boundary} -- a sharp transition from transient intermediate guesses to a stable, high-confidence answer. This transition often happens in a single step, well before the model's reasoning block ends, and is followed by \emph{epiphenomenal} CoT steps that leave the final answer probability unaltered. Using attention probes, we show that answer-formation stages can be linearly decoded from intermediate reasoning steps with high accuracy and generalize robustly to unseen reasoning tasks. We exploit this signal to early-exit reasoning blocks at the commitment boundary, reducing the length of CoTs up to 55% on average with negligible impact on model performance.
Daniel Scalena, Sara Candussio, Luca Bortolussi +3
Nov 7, 2025cs.AI

CoT-X: An Adaptive Framework for Cross-Model Chain-of-Thought Transfer and Optimization

Long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) traces can improve reasoning accuracy, but repeatedly generating them is costly for smaller or latency-constrained language models. This paper studies a practical alternative: produce a rich rationale once with a capable \emph{thinking} model, compress it, and reuse the compressed trace as context for a cheaper \emph{answering} model. We introduce CoT-X, an adaptive framework for cross-model CoT transfer. CoT-X segments reasoning traces into semantic units, scores their diagnostic and logical importance, selects budget-feasible evidence paths, and reconstructs a coherent compressed rationale for the answering model. On 7,5017,501 Japanese medical licensing questions spanning 1010 specialties, CoT-X improves accuracy over direct truncation by up to 40.5%40.5\% under the same token budget, with the largest gains at 6464--256256 tokens. Across 6464 thinking--answering pairs from eight DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen3 models (1.5B--32B parameters), reasoning transfer is most reliable within a model family, yet remains effective across families once compression normalizes the trace. A Gaussian Process Bayesian optimization layer finds near-optimal model--budget configurations with 1515 evaluations rather than an exhaustive search over all 6464 pairs, reducing evaluation cost by 84%84\%. These results show that reasoning quality, token budget, and model compatibility can be optimized jointly, making CoT-style reasoning more practical under realistic deployment constraints.
Ziqian Bi, Yinzhi Wang, Tianyang Wang +6
Jun 2, 2026cs.CL

HybridThinker: Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Compressed Memory and Transient Thought Steps

Extended chain-of-thought (CoT) traces improve LLM reasoning but incur substantial computational and memory costs. While existing CoT compression methods mitigate this by condensing thought steps into compact representations via memory tokens and retaining only these representations at inference time, the loss of fine-grained information makes subsequent steps more error-prone. To alleviate this, we propose \textbf{HybridThinker}, where in addition to preserved these representations, thought steps are also temporarily retained to provide fine-grained details. However, we observe that naively keeping thought steps accessible to subsequent steps \emph{during training} lets the model bypass memory tokens by retrieving information directly from these steps, leaving the model's ability to compress and retrieve information through memory tokens insufficiently trained. We therefore introduce a hybrid training scheme, in which only some thought steps are directly accessible through attention to subsequent steps, while the other thought steps are masked, forcing the model to use memory tokens for compression and retrieval. Across 4 reasoning benchmarks, HybridThinker matches the uncompressed baseline, advancing the state of the art in CoT compression by 5.8 points on average accuracy with similar inference time. Ablation studies confirm that both temporary thought-step retention and the hybrid training scheme contribute to these gains.
Xin Liu, Runsong Zhao, Xinyu Liu +8