NIMO Controller: a self-driving laboratory orchestrator based on the Model Context Protocol

Self-driving laboratories (SDLs), where artificial intelligence proposes subsequent experiments and robotic systems execute them, are rapidly becoming the vanguard of materials discovery. A critical bottleneck, however, lies in seamlessly bridging diverse AI algorithms tailored for specific exploration goals with the heterogeneous robotic hardware found across different laboratories. Here, we present NIMO, an open-source software platform designed to dissolve this barrier through three core paradigms: a modular AI-robot decoupling mediated via simple CSV file exchange, a discrete candidate-pool architecture that seamlessly absorbs domain knowledge, and a unified Python interface pre-loaded with twelve distinct AI algorithms. In this Perspective, we review the operational principles of each algorithm alongside six diverse SDL implementations driven by NIMO, covering electrolyte discovery, organic synthesis, thin-film exploration, fuel-cell process informatics, coffee-ring phase exploration, and legacy liquid-handling automation. One of these also demonstrates NIMO's seamless interoperability with the IvoryOS orchestration framework. To democratize autonomous science, we also introduce a no-code desktop application that enables intuitive, human-in-the-loop exploration for non-programmers. NIMO is freely available at https://github.com/NIMS-DA/nimo, offering a versatile, plug-and-play foundation to accelerate autonomous materials exploration across diverse experimental landscapes.

Physical Unified Device Architecture (PUDA) is an AI-native hardware harness for self-driving laboratories (SDLs). Rather than building a human-centered graphical user interface (GUI) orchestration layer, PUDA creates a command-line runtime environment that lets agents observe, orient, decide, and act over experiments while hardware execution remains deterministic, atomic, and auditable. Headless by design, devices appear through discoverable command-line interfaces, JSON protocols are routed through a distributed messaging system, and command responses, data products, and reports are preserved as structured records. PUDA organizes protocols, runs, samples, measurements, and command logs into an AI-native data structure linked by run identifiers and timestamps, preserving provenance from submitted protocol through hardware response to resulting data products. PUDA separates scientific orchestration from physical operation and data telemetry: agents choose experiments, while PUDA executes validated commands and captures provenance-linked state, responses, and data. The contribution is not another optimizer, orchestrator, or recipe language. It is a practical execution and data environment for agentic SDLs; the broader physical AI implication is that PUDA provides an AI-native hardware harness for AI systems to interact with physical tools.

Self-driving laboratories (SDLs) combine automated experimentation with adaptive decision-making to accelerate scientific discovery. Their operation nevertheless often depends on human specialists who translate scientific objectives into executable closed-loop campaigns. Specialists adjust them as data and operating conditions change. Here, we present La Agente 'Optima, an agentic framework that constructs and supervises Bayesian optimization campaigns across computational and experimental systems while maintaining a persistent optimization state. By separating large language model (LLM) reasoning from executed campaigns, 'Optima runs repetitive optimization loops consistently, returns control to the agent only when progress requires interpretation or campaign revision, and keeps every decision auditable. We evaluate 'Optima across ablation studies, five digital discovery tasks, and two physical platforms. Throughout, 'Optima maintained executable campaigns as both the scientific problem and execution environment evolved. In a closed-loop contact angle optimization campaign, 'Optima identified and corrected a mid-run measurement failure, bringing the contact angle from 71.4 to 67.8 degrees, just above the 64-66 degree range. From this result, 'Optima correctly inferred that the target was likely unattainable with the available reagents and recommended changing the formulation. In a five-day multi-objective flow-chemistry campaign, 'Optima increased the yield from 30% to 59% over 23 experiments. Despite substantial inference costs, it cost less and used substantially less starting material than a human-directed campaign, while selecting a more mass-efficient operating point. These results show that LLM-based agents can make rigorous, long-running optimization campaigns accessible to domain scientists without specialist setup, expanding the scope of SDLs.