cs.CVMay 15, 2026

Right Predictions, Misleading Explanations: On the Vulnerability of Vision-Language Model Explanations

Authors: Narges Babadi, Hadis Karimipour

Abstract

Explanation mechanisms are increasingly used to support transparency and trust in vision-language models (VLMs), particularly in settings where model decisions require human oversight. However, the robustness of these explanations remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we investigate whether explanation heatmaps in VLMs, particularly CLIP-based models, faithfully reflect model reasoning under adversarial conditions. We show that explanation maps can be systematically manipulated while preserving the model's original prediction, revealing a disconnect between predictive behavior and explanation faithfulness. To study this vulnerability, we introduce X-Shift, a novel grey-box attack that perturbs patch-level visual representations to redirect explanation heatmaps toward semantically irrelevant regions without altering the predicted output. Unlike conventional adversarial attacks that aim to induce misclassification, X-Shift specifically targets the integrity of the explanation process itself. The attack operates without modifying model parameters and generalizes across multiple CLIP architectures and explanation methods. We evaluate the proposed approach on ImageNet-1k, MS-COCO, and Flickr30K, demonstrating consistent degradation in explanation alignment under imperceptible perturbations while maintaining prediction stability. Furthermore, standard prediction-oriented adversarial attacks fail to reproduce the same explanation-shifting behavior even under substantially larger perturbation budgets. Our findings highlight a fundamental limitation of current explanation mechanisms in VLMs and raise concerns about their use as reliable indicators of model trustworthiness in high-impact applications.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jun 4, 2026cs.CV

Adversarial Attacks Already Tell the Answer: Directional Bias-Guided Test-time Defense for Vision-Language Models

Vision-Language Models (VLMs), such as CLIP, have shown strong zero-shot generalization but remain highly vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, posing serious risks in real-world applications. Test-time defenses for VLMs have recently emerged as a promising and efficient approach to defend against adversarial attacks without requiring costly large-scale retraining. In this work, we uncover a surprising phenomenon: under diverse input transformations, adversarial images in CLIP's feature space consistently shift along a dominant direction, in contrast to the dispersed patterns of clean images. We hypothesize that this dominant shift, termed the Defense Direction, opposes the adversarial shift, pointing features back toward their correct class centers. Building on this insight, we propose Directional Bias-guided Defense (DBD), a test-time framework that estimates the Defense Direction and employs a DB-score-based two-stream reconstruction strategy to recover robust representations. Experiments on 15 datasets demonstrate that DBD not only achieves SOTA adversarial robustness while preserving clean accuracy, but also reveals the counterintuitive result that adversarial accuracy can even surpass clean accuracy. This demonstrates that adversarial perturbations inherently encode directional priors about the true decision boundary.
Liangsheng Liu, Si Chen, Jiamin Wu +5
Prior Knowledge
AskPDF
May 27, 2026cs.CV

JECA^2: Judgment-Explanation Consistent Adversarial Attack against Forensic Vision-Language Models

Forensic vision-language models (VLMs) have recently been developed to detect image tampering and provide natural-language explanations. However, their robustness against adversarial manipulation remains underexplored. Existing adversarial attacks typically aim to flip the model's binary judgment, while the accompanying explanation may still reveal forensic cues and contradict the attacked judgment. In this paper, we study judgment-explanation consistent adversarial attacks against forensic VLMs and propose JECA^2, a controlled white-box red-team diagnostic that jointly redirects visual attribution and aligns textual explanations with the target judgment. On the visual side, JECA^2 uses Grad-CAM-guided perturbations to divert attribution from tampered regions toward benign regions. On the textual side, it optimizes prompt embeddings toward authenticity-affirming semantics under a token-proximity constraint. Experiments on forensic VLM benchmarks show that JECA^2 achieves higher attack success and automated judgment-explanation consistency than implemented baselines under white-box threat settings, while transfer to closed-source VLMs remains measurable but limited. Our results highlight a consistency failure mode in explanation-based forensic VLMs and motivate future robustness evaluation beyond binary detection accuracy.
Jiachen Qian
Adversarial ExamplesLarge Vision Language ModelsVisual AttributionHuman Judgment
AskPDF
May 5, 2026cs.CR

Laundering AI Authority with Adversarial Examples

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed as trusted authorities -- fact-checking images on social media, comparing products, and moderating content. Users implicitly trust that these systems perceive the same visual content as they do. We show that adversarial examples break this assumption, enabling \emph{AI authority laundering}: an attacker subtly perturbs an image so that the VLM produces confident and authoritative responses about the \emph{wrong} input. Unlike jailbreaks or prompt injections, our attacks do not compromise model alignment; the attack operates entirely at the perceptual level. We demonstrate that standard attacks against publicly available CLIP models transfer reliably to production VLMs -- including GPT-5.4, Claude Opus4.6, Gemini3, and Grok~4.2. Across four attack surfaces, we show that authority laundering can amplify misinformation, disparage individuals, evade content moderation, and manipulate product recommendations. Our attacks have high success rates: In hundreds of attacks targeting identity manipulation and NSFW evasion, we measure success rates of 22−100%22 - 100\% across six models. No novel attack algorithm is required: basic techniques known for over a decade suffice, establishing a lower bound on attacker capability that should concern defenders. Our results demonstrate that visual adversarial robustness is now a practical -- and still largely unsolved -- safety problem.
Jie Zhang, Pura Peetathawatchai, Florian Tramèr +1
Adversarial ExamplesAdversarial TransferabilityAi-Generated Image DetectionArtificial Intelligence Governance
AskPDF