Self-supervised local learning rules learn the hidden hierarchical structure of high-dimensional data

Modern machine learning applications employ deep neural networks training with the error backpropagation algorithm. Although this algorithm is very effective, it lacks biological realism. For example, backpropagation requires symmetric connectivity, and a separate neural processing channel for error signals. Prior works have therefore proposed a number of more realistic alternatives for error backpropagation. However, most of them still suffer from demanding preassumptions that may be not fulfilled in the real brain, for example, they often still require either symmetric connectivity or two separate processing channels, and often require also special mathematical operations like subtractions or function inversions. Here I propose supervised counterstream learning in deep associative networks as a simpler approach that requires only recognition of errors during training, and then backpropagates correcting target activity through the same activity channel as used for forward propagation. For this, two activity waves are initiated at the same time in input and output layers and then traveling in opposite directions to meet in one of the hidden layers. By employing simple local Hebbian-type learning rules, the corresponding activity pattern sequences get linked bidirectionally, thereby decreasing error rates over time. Despite its simplicity and an incomplete hyperparameter optimzation, a high high test accuracy is achieved on the (binarized) MNIST data set that is comparable to more demanding architectures.

Biological visual systems learn from limited experience, unlike deep learning models that rely on millions of training images. What learning principles make this possible? We tested whether efficient coding, the idea that neural representations capture the statistical structure of natural inputs, can build a hierarchy of human-aligned visual features from limited data. We developed an unsupervised learning procedure in which each layer of a deep network compresses its inputs onto the dominant modes of variation in natural images, using only local statistics and no labels, tasks, or backpropagation. This unsupervised procedure yields features that progress from edges and colors to textures and shapes. The features of this deep efficient coding model are readily recognized by human observers and are predictive of image-evoked fMRI responses in human visual cortex. Furthermore, a hybrid learning procedure that combines efficient coding with supervised fine-tuning yields better brain alignment in low-data settings and more rapid category learning. These findings suggest that efficient coding may shape representations across the entire visual hierarchy and help explain the data efficiency of biological vision.

A central question in computational neuroscience is whether the learning rule used to train a neural network determines how well its internal representations align with those of the human visual cortex. We present a systematic comparison of four learning rules (backpropagation (BP), feedback alignment (FA), predictive coding (PC), and spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP)) applied to identical convolutional architectures and evaluated against human fMRI data from the THINGS-fMRI dataset (720 stimuli, 3 subjects) using Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA). All models process stimuli at 224 x 224 resolution; results are averaged across 5 random seeds. Crucially, we include an untrained random-weights baseline that reveals the dominant role of architecture. At V1/V2, the untrained baseline exceeds backpropagation (rho = 0.076 vs. rho = 0.034; Delta-rho = +0.044, p < 0.001), and STDP achieves the highest V1 alignment among trained rules (rho = 0.064). At LOC, only BP reliably exceeds the random baseline (rho = 0.012 vs. -0.005, p < 0.001). At IT, all five conditions converge (rho = 0.008-0.014) with no significant pairwise differences among trained rules (p > 0.05, FDR-corrected). FA consistently produces the lowest alignment at V1, V2, and LOC (rho = 0.012 at V1, below all other conditions). Partial RSA confirms all effects survive pixel-similarity control. Seed variability is small relative to between-rule differences at V1/V2. These results demonstrate that early visual alignment is architecture-driven, learning rules differentiate only at intermediate areas, and all rules converge at the highest levels of the hierarchy.