An Approximation Algorithm for Graph Label Selection

The Graph Coloring Problem (GCP) is NP-hard and DSATUR stands as one of the fastest heuristics for it despite producing colorings that typically use more colors than state-of-the-art coloring algorithms. We propose SSLD (Semidefinite Spectral Learning with DSATUR), which improves DSATUR by preprocessing a first good color class before letting DSATUR complete coloring the rest of the given graph. We obtain this color class from a Semidefinite Programming (SDP), similar to an SDP used to compute the Lovász theta number. To the best of our knowledge, SSLD is the first approach to improve DSATUR by preprocessing through fixed color classes. We evaluate SSLD against DSATUR and against a naive 1-color-class preprocessing algorithm on DIMACS instances, random graphs (Erdős--Rényi, Watts-Strogatz, Barabási--Albert), Frequency Assignment and Job Shop Scheduling instances. SSLD matches or beats DSATUR in almost every case across over 1600 benchmark instances, and out performs the naive GISD baseline, allows us to confirm the value brought by the SDP-guided choice of the first color class. This quality comes at a runtime cost of roughly 195 times slower that DSATUR, but demonstrating that SDP-guided preprocessing of a first color class is a direction for future improvements.

This paper studies learning-augmented online weighted vertex cover with advice and a parameter $λ\in (0,1)$. We consider two graph cases: bipartite graphs and general graphs. In both settings, the online algorithm must maintain a feasible vertex cover under irrevocable decisions. We show that these problems admit the same robustness--consistency tradeoffs as learning-augmented ski rental. For the bipartite graph model, we give a randomized algorithm that is $\frac{1}{1-e^{-λ}}$-robust and $\fracλ{1-e^{-λ}}$-consistent. For the general graph model, we give a deterministic algorithm that is $(1+\frac{1}λ)$-robust and $(1+λ)$-consistent. We prove that the tradeoffs above are optimal in both settings. We also validate the proposed algorithms through experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets.

Balancing resource efficiency and fairness is critical in networked systems that support modern learning applications. We introduce the \emph{Fair Minimum Labeling} (FML) problem: the task of designing a minimum-cost temporal edge activation plan that ensures each group of nodes in a network has sufficient access to a designated target set, according to specified coverage requirements. FML captures key trade-offs in systems where edge activations incur resource costs and equitable access is essential, such as distributed data collection, update dissemination in edge-cloud systems, and fair service restoration in critical infrastructure. We first give a structural characterisation of the single-terminal case, showing that it is equivalent to the rooted Covering Steiner problem. We prove that FML is NP-hard and admits no $((1-ε)\ln |\mathcal{C}|)$-approximation for $|\mathcal{C}|$ groups, already on a star, while for any fixed number of groups it inherits a constant-factor approximation and remains APX-hard. We then present probabilistic approximation algorithms for the two-group, single-terminal case: an algorithm whose tree subroutine is exact, hence optimal on tree-structured networks and $\mathcal{O}(\log |V|)$ in expectation on general graphs, together with a faster bicriteria variant whose coverage violation degrades gracefully with the merge depth of the tree computation. For practical scalability, we additionally introduce a graph-native variant based on a shortest-path-tree reduction. Empirical results show that FML enforces group-level fairness, while the graph-native variant substantially improves scalability and achieves competitive activation cost.