The success of self-supervised learning (SSL) in vision and NLP has motivated its rapid adoption for time series. However, research has focused primarily on Generative paradigms and forecasting tasks, leaving the broader utility of learned representations unquantified. We establish a controlled framework to evaluate the "pre-training dividend": the value added by SSL across diverse temporal tasks. We systematically compare Generative paradigms against Latent Alignment architectures, introducing adaptations of LeJEPA and DINO for time series. These adaptations utilize Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) augmentations to enforce invariance to local fluctuations. Our analysis reveals that the pre-training dividend is highly asymmetric: SSL yields gains of up to 375% for anomaly detection and classification, yet remains marginal for forecasting. We demonstrate that representational utility is non-universal, governed by a precision-invariance trade-off where the specific signal resolution required by the task must align with the objective. Finally, we show that representation quality is largely independent of data origin and saturates at moderate architectural depths, suggesting a path to scaling via massive synthetic generation. Our code is available at: https://github.com/noammajor/Models
Choosing the wrong synthetic generator for time-series foundation model pretraining is costly: under identical training budgets, the best and worst generators produce up to a 2× gap in forecasting error, yet the field has no principled way to make this choice. The problem is compounded by the fact that generator rankings are not stable across architectures: across 11 generator families evaluated on Chronos-T5-Mini and Moirai-Small trained from scratch, we find that which generators are useful depends on the model architecture. Rather than solving the generator selection problem, we sidestep it: a simple equal-weight mixture of all generators matches or beats the best individual generator for both architectures, and composing this mixture with real data yields the strongest pretraining corpora overall. Synthetic pretraining is therefore a corpus composition problem, not a generator selection problem, and composition choices should be validated per model family rather than assumed to transfer.
Time series are central to modern data mining applications, from industrial telemetry and server metrics to finance and physiology, yet time-series self-supervised learning often depends on view and augmentation choices that encode domain-specific invariances. We study how an SSL recipe behaves when its method-specific configuration is reused unchanged after the pretraining signal family changes, framing this as a fixed-recipe stress test rather than a comparison against optimally tuned methods. We introduce Latent Euclidean Next-Embedding Prediction Architecture (LeNEPA), a no-augmentation next-latent-token objective with a causal backbone. LeNEPA replaces the stop-gradient/EMA stabilization used by vanilla NEPA with SIGReg-based isotropy regularization and computes the predictive loss in a lightweight projected space that is discarded for evaluation. We compare LeNEPA with an ECG-tuned JEPA recipe under a fixed-horizon frozen-probe protocol on PTB-XL and Diag, a synthetic diagnostic corpus generated with Aionoscope. Both methods are retrained independently on each dataset while keeping their method-specific recipes unchanged. In this protocol, the ECG-tuned JEPA recipe is strong in-domain on PTB-XL but weaker when reused unchanged on Diag, whereas LeNEPA preserves useful frozen-probe gains on both datasets. Learning curves suggest faster early representation acquisition: LeNEPA reaches 80% of its final AUROC/AUPRC gain after 2--5k updates, compared with 5--10k updates for the faster JEPA readout. As a separate external frozen-encoder check, a CauKer-pretrained LeNEPA variant reaches 77.65% mean UCR-128 Random-Forest accuracy in a single-seed, best-checkpoint run, within 1.16 points of Mantis and within 0.24 points of MOMENT (77.89%). Overall, the results support no-augmentation latent prediction as a useful candidate recipe for low-retuning time-series SSL.
Self-supervised learning (SSL) for time-series representation learning is dominated by two paradigms: contrastive methods, which face challenges in constructing positive or negative pairs, and masking-based methods, which disrupt the temporal continuity of time-series signals. Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) offers a promising alternative by predicting in representation space rather than reconstructing raw inputs. However, existing time-series JEPA variants still rely on masking and therefore inherit its continuity problem. Crop-based Forward JEPA (CF-JEPA) is proposed as an innovative mask-free framework that replaces masking with multi-horizon forward prediction: random crops serve as context views, and short-, mid-, and long-horizon future representations are predicted in the forward temporal direction, directly leveraging the inherent temporal ordering of time-series data as a learning signal. A strong asymmetry is also identified between the online encoder and the exponential moving average (EMA) target encoder, both produced from a single training run: the online encoder develops higher-rank discriminative features, while the EMA target encoder develops smoother, lower-rank temporal features. Exploiting this asymmetry, classification is routed to the online encoder and forecasting or anomaly detection to the EMA target encoder, achieving a 27% reduction in multivariate forecasting mean squared error (MSE) at no additional training cost. Across 126 University of California, Riverside (UCR) and 26 University of East Anglia (UEA) classification datasets, eight electricity transformer temperature forecasting benchmarks, and Key Performance Indicator /Yahoo anomaly detection, CF-JEPA achieves the highest average accuracy and rank on UCR and UEA among self-supervised baselines and ranks second on univariate forecasting and k-nearest neighbors-scored anomaly detection.