Mix, Don't Pick: Why Synthetic Corpus Composition Matters for Time Series Foundation Model Pretraining

Time series foundation models (TSFMs) are increasingly pre-trained on synthetically generated time series trajectories, where the data generating process is known. Current pre-training recipes are based on loss objectives which compare TSFM outputs to realized future values of each trajectory. We instead propose loss objectives which compare TSFM outputs to the conditional forecast distribution of each trajectory, a procedure we call synthetic data distillation (SDD). SDD corresponds to a Rao-Blackwellization of the training objective, in that it leaves the expectation of stochastic gradients unchanged while provably reducing the covariance of the stochastic gradient under the Loewner partial ordering. We empirically validate SDD on a TSFM model family of sizes from $4$M to $2.5$B parameters, and observe faster convergence of validation loss at every model size: on Gaussian Process data, SDD attains or improves upon the Status Quo loss whilst requiring $10\%-40\%$ less training iterations.

Synthetic data has transformed language model training, yet its role in time series forecasting remains poorly understood. We present a large-scale empirical study: nine experiment groups, 4,218 runs systematically evaluating synthetic time series augmentation across five architectures, four synthetic signals and seven datasets. The effect is sharply architecture-conditional: channel-mixing models (TimesNet, iTransformer) benefit in the majority of trials, while channel-independent models (DLinear, PatchTST) are consistently degraded. In selected low-resource settings the gains are striking: TimesNet trained on only 10% of Weather data with synthetic augmentation surpasses the full-data baseline (4 of 16 sparsity-dataset combinations). Averaged across all architectures, augmentation hurts in 67% of trials. We further find that only the Seasonal-Trend generator reliably helps across the tested benchmarks, and that hard curriculum switching is actively harmful (+24% MSE degradation). These results provide concrete, actionable guidelines on how to use synthetic data: use synthetic augmentation with channel-mixing architectures, use gradual annealing schedules, and treat low-resource augmentation as architecture- and dataset-dependent. Code is available at \href{https://github.com/hugoiscracked/synthetic-ts/tree/main}

The success of self-supervised learning (SSL) in vision and NLP has motivated its rapid adoption for time series. However, research has focused primarily on Generative paradigms and forecasting tasks, leaving the broader utility of learned representations unquantified. We establish a controlled framework to evaluate the "pre-training dividend": the value added by SSL across diverse temporal tasks. We systematically compare Generative paradigms against Latent Alignment architectures, introducing adaptations of LeJEPA and DINO for time series. These adaptations utilize Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) augmentations to enforce invariance to local fluctuations. Our analysis reveals that the pre-training dividend is highly asymmetric: SSL yields gains of up to 375% for anomaly detection and classification, yet remains marginal for forecasting. We demonstrate that representational utility is non-universal, governed by a precision-invariance trade-off where the specific signal resolution required by the task must align with the objective. Finally, we show that representation quality is largely independent of data origin and saturates at moderate architectural depths, suggesting a path to scaling via massive synthetic generation. Our code is available at: https://github.com/noammajor/Models