Organizations: AWS Generative AI Innovation Center · HSBC Holdings Plc., HSBC Technology Center, China
Abstract
Self-evolving skill libraries, pioneered by Voyager, let frozen LLM agents accumulate reusable knowledge without weight updates, yet recent evaluation shows that LLM-authored skills deliver +0.0pp over no-skill baselines while human-curated ones deliver +16.2pp: the bottleneck is not skill authoring but lifecycle management. We introduce \textbf{Ratchet}, a single-agent loop in which a frozen LLM writes, retrieves, curates, and retires its own natural-language skills. Ratchet integrates four candidate hygiene mechanisms: outcome-driven retirement, a bounded active-cap, meta-skill authoring guidance, and pattern canonicalisation. On MBPP+ hard-100 with Claude Opus 4.7, Ratchet lifts held-out pass@1 from a 0.258±0.047 baseline to a late-window rolling mean of 0.584 (peak 0.658±0.042) across 100 rounds and 3 seeds, a +0.328±0.018 rolling-mean gain where the no-skill control drifts at +0.002±0.005; the same recipe transfers to an agentic solver on SWE-bench Verified (+0.22 peak lift over 20 rounds). Eight ablations (A1--A8) reveal that the minimal working recipe is smaller than our design suggests: retirement and the meta-skill authoring prior are load-bearing, while explicit deduplication (canonicalisation, cover-guard) is subsumed by the meta-skill itself. A non-divergence proposition shows that bounded cap and retirement threshold together prevent expected performance from drifting below the no-skills floor.
Self-evolving skill libraries face a silent failure mode we term \emph{library drift}: unbounded skill accumulation without outcome-driven lifecycle management causes retrieval degradation, false-positive injections, and performance stagnation. Recent evaluation confirms the symptom (LLM-authored skills deliver +0.0pp gain while human-curated ones deliver +16.2pp (SkillsBench)), yet the underlying mechanism has not been isolated. We provide (1) a \textbf{reproducible trigger}: ablations that isolate drift: one disables skill injection (flat floor, +0.002), one imposes premature retirement (active harm, −0.019); (2) \textbf{trace-level diagnostics}: an append-only evidence log with per-skill contribution scores, attribution verdicts, and router engagement metrics that make the failure visible before it reaches end-task scores; and (3) a \textbf{verified fix}: a minimal governance recipe (outcome-driven retirement + bounded active-cap + meta-skill authoring prior) that lifts held-out pass@1 from a 0.258 baseline to a late-window mean of 0.584 (rolling gain +0.328) on MBPP+ hard-100 over 100 rounds. Eight ablations decompose which governance mechanisms are load-bearing and which are subsumed, providing a concrete playbook for diagnosing library drift in any self-evolving agent.
Skill documents, structured natural-language instructions that guide Large Language Model (LLM) agents, are critical to modern agent frameworks, yet LLMs struggle to write skills that actually work. On SkillsBench, human-authored skills improve pass rates by 16.2 percentage points, while LLM-authored skills provide no measurable gain. We introduce SkillAxe, a fully unsupervised framework that enables LLMs to iteratively diagnose and refine their own skills. SkillAxe decomposes skill quality into four interpretable dimensions (quality impact, trigger precision, instruction compliance with fault attribution, and solution-path coverage), producing structured improvement briefs that require no ground-truth labels, test suites, or environment rewards. On SkillsBench, SkillAxe improves pass rates by 28% relative over unimproved LLM skills and closes 47--67% of the gap to human-authored skills. We validate the approach as a continuous improvement engine in the wild on SpreadsheetBench, where a SkillAxe-built skill library learns from past agent trajectories and raises pass rate from 16.0% to 52.0% using only 22 skills.
Large language model (LLM) agents rely on reusable skills to solve complex tasks, but existing skill creation approaches often treat skills as isolated, static artifacts, limiting reusability, reliability, and long-term improvement. We propose MUSE-Autoskill Agent (Memory-Utilizing Skill Evolution), a skill-centric agent framework that creates, reuses, and refines skills under a unified lifecycle: creation, memory, management, evaluation, and refinement. MUSE creates skills on demand, stores them across tasks, retrieves them through a skill catalog, and accumulates per-skill experience for later reuse and adaptation. Across the main reported settings on SkillsBench and SkillLearnBench, MUSE-Autoskill outperforms Hermes, Codex, and Claude Code. On SkillsBench, its self-created skills surpass human-authored skills on the successfully covered subset (85.24% vs. 81.17%), showing that lifecycle-managed skills can distill agent experience into highly effective reusable assets; MUSE-created skills also transfer to Hermes more effectively than Codex- or Claude-created skills, reaching 51.90% accuracy under transfer. These results highlight the importance of treating skills as long-lived, experience-aware, and testable assets.