In Silico Modeling of the RAMPHO Buffer: Dissociating Informational and Energetic Masking via Phonetic Entropy in Deep Neural Networks

We systematically investigate neural speech enhancement systems, ranging from very small ($\sim$10,k parameters) to medium-large ($\sim$2-5,M parameters), which specialize to acoustic conditions using contextual information such as speaker identity, noise type, speaker gender, spoken language, and SNR. By fine-tuning generalist models on specific data subsets, we find that specializing to a speaker's identity consistently yields the largest gains in estimated speech intelligibility and quality. In contrast, specializing to SNR, noise type, or gender offers only marginal benefits. Crucially, we show that a small model specialized to both a specific speaker and a specific noise type can match or exceed the performance of a generalist model ten times its size. Further, cross-lingual tests reveal that models specialized to a target language outperform multilingual generalists, suggesting that language is a salient feature for specialization. These findings highlight the potential of small, adaptive models for resource-constrained applications like hearing aids, which specialize on-the-fly to contextual information.

Large audio-language models (LALMs) often underperform on fine-grained, non-semantic attributes of speech, such as a speaker's emotion, despite strong performance on speech content. Improving this without the cost of retraining calls for an effective inference-time intervention, yet most existing methods intervene only after the audio encoder and operate at a relatively coarse granularity. The encoder itself, where acoustic information is first extracted from the waveform, remains largely unexplored, especially at the level of individual neurons. We introduce IAAN, Identifying and Amplifying Acoustic Neurons, a training-free and label-free method that scores each feed-forward neuron in the audio encoder by contrasting its activation on the real waveform with that on a noise reference lacking the real audio's acoustic information. IAAN then amplifies a small set of the highest-scoring neurons at inference. Across ten non-semantic speech attributes, IAAN improves average accuracy by 25.7 points on Audio-Flamingo-3, 21.4 on Qwen2.5-Omni, and 9.7 on Kimi-Audio. It also improves a model already explicitly fine-tuned to prioritize acoustic evidence. In controlled comparisons, both the encoder locus and neuron-level selectivity prove necessary for this gain. Intervening after the encoder, at the decoding side or inside the language model, yields little to no improvement, or even deteriorates accuracy. The improvement also depends on which specific neurons are amplified, not merely on their number, confirming that IAAN's acoustic score succeeds in identifying the neurons that matter. These results show that a small, precisely targeted intervention inside the audio encoder is an effective and largely untapped way to strengthen the acoustic understanding of LALMs, opening a new direction for inference-time methods that improve acoustic perception through neuron-level access to the encoder.

Target-speaker and multi-speaker extraction are techniques for extracting speech from a desired speaker or desired speakers in the presence of other speakers and/or noise. Neural network approaches for this task are often trained and evaluated using simulated datasets, with balanced amounts of target speech and speaker enrolment samples which closely match the target speech. However, in real multi-party conversations, participants are often silent for more time than they are speaking, and their enrolment speech samples can differ substantially from the target speech in the conversation. These factors can impact the training and evaluation of these techniques on recordings of real conversations. This work proposes a new loss function, which helps mitigate the effect of excess silence in training, improving STOI from 0.55 to 0.60, and frequency-weighted segmental SNR from 4.35 to 5.12. Additionally, the impact of the mismatch between the enrolment speech and target speech is explored.