Organizations: Institut für Mathematik, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
In learning-augmented online algorithms, predictions are usually valued for what they say: a value estimate, a solution, or an algorithmic recommendation. This paper shows that predictions can also be valuable solely due to their arrival time. We study the fundamental secretary problem augmented with a stochastic precursor: a content-free signal that is guaranteed to arrive no later than the best item, but is otherwise stochastically timed. The signal does not carry any additional information; nevertheless, its timing alone changes the structure of optimal stopping. We characterize optimal policies in the random-order and adversarial-order models. In random order, a single uniformly timed precursor already gives success probability at least 21, improving on the classic e1 benchmark. With increasingly late precursors, the success probability approaches 1. In adversarial order, for which traditional models do not admit strong guarantees, sufficiently concentrated precursors recover constant success guarantees. Our results show that such novel forms of asynchronous temporal information are a distinct and powerful form of advice in online decision making and may also be effective for other problems.
We present a learning-augmented online algorithm for the preemptive FIFO buffer management problem, where packets arrive online to a finite-capacity buffer, must be transmitted in FIFO order, and the algorithm may preemptively discard buffered packets to accommodate future arrivals. Our algorithm simultaneously achieves 1-consistency, η-smoothness, and asymptotic \sqrt{3}-robustness, where ηdenotes the prediction error. Specifically, it attains an optimal competitive ratio of 1 under perfect predictions, degrades smoothly as the prediction error increases, and maintains an asymptotic competitive ratio of \sqrt{3} under arbitrarily inaccurate predictions, matching the best-known worst-case guarantee for the classical online problem, established by Englert and Westermann in 2009 [Algorithmica 53(4): 523-548]. A key technical contribution of our work is the introduction of an \emph{output-based prediction error metric}. Because capacity constraints dictate that only a strictly bounded subset of arriving packets is ultimately transmitted, our metric assesses prediction quality over the resulting optimal schedules rather than the raw input sequences, avoiding artificial error penalties. To guarantee robustness, our algorithm dynamically monitors predictions and executes a \emph{buffer-clearing strategy} upon transitioning to a worst-case fallback mechanism. We prove that the competitive loss incurred by this clearing operation is bounded by an additive capacity constant that vanishes asymptotically. Finally, we show that our algorithm provides a generalized framework for learning-augmented buffer management: substituting the fallback module with any β-competitive online algorithm immediately yields asymptotic β-robustness.
Learning-augmented algorithms have emerged as a powerful paradigm to surpass traditional worst-case lower bounds by integrating potentially noisy predictions. While this framework has seen success in online scheduling, existing work primarily optimizes job latency while relying on frequent, ``blind'' preemptions. This ignores the fundamental trade-off between algorithmic performance and preemption complexity. We provide the first systematic study of learning-augmented scheduling that curbs preemption while optimizing latency. We establish that the gap between theoretical latency bounds and preemption overhead can be bridged with solid analytical foundations. Our results include O(1)-competitive algorithms for single and unrelated parallel machines with only O(1) preemptions per job under accurate predictions, with overhead scaling logarithmically with the prediction error. By providing the first bounded-preemption guarantees for unrelated and malleable machines, we extend the theoretical reach of the learning-augmented framework to more constrained and realistic settings. Finally, our algorithms are validated through experiments.
Most work on sequential learning assumes a fixed set of actions that are available all the time. However, in practice, actions can consist of picking subsets of readings from sensors that may break from time to time, road segments that can be blocked or goods that are out of stock. In this paper we study learning algorithms that are able to deal with stochastic availability of such unreliable composite actions. We propose and analyze algorithms based on the Follow-The-Perturbed-Leader prediction method for several learning settings differing in the feedback provided to the learner. Our algorithms rely on a novel loss estimation technique that we call Counting Asleep Times. We deliver regret bounds for our algorithms for the previously studied full information and (semi-)bandit settings, as well as a natural middle point between the two that we call the restricted information setting. A special consequence of our results is a significant improvement of the best known performance guarantees achieved by an efficient algorithm for the sleeping bandit problem with stochastic availability. Finally, we evaluate our algorithms empirically and show their improvement over the known approaches.