Uncovering the Latent Potential of Deep Intermediate Representations

Arnesh Batra; Arush Gumber; Aniket Khandelwal; Jashn Khemani; Anubha Gupta

cs.LGMay 21, 2026

Uncovering the Latent Potential of Deep Intermediate Representations

Authors: Arnesh Batra, Arush Gumber, Aniket Khandelwal, Jashn Khemani, Anubha Gupta

Abstract

Foundational Models pretrained on huge amount of data learn representations that evolve across depth, forming a hierarchy of embeddings with distinct semantic content and geometric structure. Contrary to the widespread practice of using only the final layer or shallow mixtures, we show that task-relevant information is distributed non-monotonically across layers and cannot be recovered by naïve aggregation. Through a geometric and empirical study across multiple modalities, we show that effective transfer depends on identifying which layers encode task-discriminative structure and how their embeddings are geometrically organized. We introduce Layer-wise Optimal Embedding Selection (LOES), a constructive spectral method that identifies task-discriminative subspaces by minimizing residual error under orthogonality and isotropy constraints. To align fine-tuning with this selection principle, we further propose Geometric Regularization Loss (GeoReg), which enforces a simplicial structure on class manifolds and stabilizes representation geometry during fine-tuning. Across a wide range of architectures, depths, modalities, and data regimes, LOES consistently outperforms standard baselines, with gains that grow as model depth increases. Beyond accuracy, our method reveals how semantic factors are distributed across layers, thereby enabling cross-lingual and cross-modal interpretability analyses. Together, our results provide strong evidence that layerwise embedding geometry is not incidental but central to how deep models represent and transfer knowledge.

Explore similar work

May 12, 2026cs.LG

Layer-wise Representation Dynamics: An Empirical Investigation Across Embedders and Base LLMs

Hidden states change substantially across the layers of modern language models, but most layer-wise analyses focus on one aspect of that change. We propose Layer-wise Representation Dynamics (LRD), a framework with three layer-wise measurement families: Frenet (Grassmann speed and curvature) for global subspace motion, Neighborhood Retention Score (NRS) for local nearest-neighbor retention, and Graph Filtration Mutual Information (GFMI) for alignment with the final layer. Applying LRD to 31 models (encoder-based and decoder-based embedders, plus base LLMs) on 30 MTEB tasks reveals architectural and task-level differences that are not apparent from final-layer representations alone. We then use LRD for two applications: label-free model selection and inference-time layer pruning. For selection, all three model-level scores correlate positively with downstream MTEB performance, with end-to-end subspace displacement (d_{0,L}) the strongest, and the same direction holds on a smaller base-LLM MMLU panel. For pruning, GFMI is the only measurement-guided rule that beats Random at the 15% and 20% budgets and has the best median change at every budget. Frenet is effective only at the lightest budget, while NRS does not transfer from model selection to pruning. These results show that layer-wise structure provides signal for both interpretation and deployment decisions.

Jingzhou Jiang, Yi Yang, Kar Yan Tam

Heterogeneous Pruning Scores Model Selection

Ask PDF

May 27, 2026cs.AI

Geometry of Human Perceptual Domains Emerges Transiently in LLM Representations

While large language models (LLMs) are trained purely on textual data, prior work has shown that their internal representations can exhibit rich geometric structure in embedding space. Building on this line of work, we investigate whether such structure is similar to human perceptual organisation across different domains (e.g., color, pitch, emotion, and taste). Specifically, we study the layer-wise emergence of intrinsic geometrical structure corresponding to perceptual modalities within the residual streams of multiple open-weight transformer architectures. Our results reveal three key findings. First, we observe the emergence of layer-wise geometric structure across multiple perceptual domains, despite the absence of any direct perceptual supervision during training. Second, these perceptual domains exhibit distinct emergence profiles, with both geometric structure and its alignment with human baselines following domain- and model-specific trajectories across depth. Third, this emergence follows a consistent representational trajectory: geometry is weak or diffuse in early layers, becomes progressively organised in intermediate layers, and is attenuated in later layers, suggesting that perceptual geometry arises transiently as part of the model's internal transformation pipeline. This provides new insight into how and where human-like perceptual geometry arises in LLMs, offering a principled pathway for mechanistic analysis of internal representations.

Simardeep Singh, Paras Chopra

Perceptual Understanding Interaction Trajectories

Ask PDF

May 16, 2026cs.LG

Scale Determines Whether Language Models Organize Representation Geometry for Prediction

In language models, what a representation encodes is determined by the geometry of its representation space: distances, not activations, carry meaning. Existing tools characterize the shape of this geometry but do not ask what that shape is organized for. We introduce Subspace PGA, a metric that tests whether a layer's distance structure aligns with the readout subspace of the unembedding matrix

W_U

more than with random subspaces of equal size. Across seven Pythia models (70M--6.9B) and three cross-family models, intermediate geometry is significantly organized for prediction (peak

z = 9

24

), but the degree is scale-dependent: small models (

d \leq 1024

) progressively lose it at late layers during training -- even as loss keeps improving -- while large models (

d \geq 2048

) preserve it throughout. We trace this to a capacity trade-off: a few dominant directions migrate away from

W_U

's readout, masking rather than destroying the predictive structure beneath, and removing them restores alignment. Neither spectral metrics nor loss curves capture this distinction. Scale thus determines not only how well a model predicts, but how its representation geometry is organized to do so.

Weilun Xu

Representation Space

Ask PDF