physics.space-phMay 21, 2026

Aurora Hunter: A Two-Stage Framework for Probabilistic Visibility Forecasting

Authors: Zongyuan GeChenwaner ZhangHaoyang LiHantai ZhangWei ZhouWenxin GuZhaoming Wang

Organizations: College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China · School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming 650504, People’s Republic of China · Engineering Research Center of Advanced Marine Physical Instruments and Equipment, Ministry of Education, Qingdao 266100, China · Qingdao Key Laboratory of Optics and Optoelectronics, Qingdao 266100, China

Abstract

Forecasting aurora borealis visibility matters for space weather research and aurora tourism. Visibility at a site and night depends on two distinct factors: (1) whether aurora is physically occurring, driven by solar wind-magnetosphere coupling, and (2) whether observing conditions allow naked-eye detection, mainly cloud cover and lunar illumination. We present Aurora Hunter, a two-stage cascade that decouples these factors. Stage 1 predicts P(occurring) with XGBoost using 51 physics-driven features trained on joint Tromso+Kiruna data (about 16,600 hourly samples, 2015-2023) with labels from the Tromso AI all-sky image classifier. Stage 2 predicts P(clear observation given occurring) with logistic regression using 21 cloud-cover and lunar-illumination features trained only on aurora-occurring hours. The cascade P(visible)=P(occurring)*P(clear|occurring) reaches ROC-AUC 0.937 (Tromso test, 2019-2020) and 0.905 (independent Kiruna, 2024), improving a single-stage baseline by +0.087. Held-out Skibotn data (2022-2025) confirm cross-site generalization. SHAP identifies the Kp x nightside interaction, MLT position, and auroral oval distance as dominant predictors (39% combined). Prototype: https://aurora-hunter.onrender.com.

Explore similar work

Jun 24, 2026cs.LG

Does Aurora Encode Atmospheric Structure? Latent Regime Analysis and Attribution

ML foundation models are able to emulate atmospheric dynamics accurately and efficiently but operate as opaque ``black boxes''. We investigate the internal representations of the Aurora model using spatially pooled PCA and layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP). We find evidence that Aurora's latent space is primarily organized by seasonal cycles, whereas extreme storm events do not form a linearly separable cluster. LRP indicates that the model attends to features consistent with the 3D vertical structure of the Great Storm of 1987. Perturbation tests show masking relevant regions degrades forecasts 3.31×3.31\times more than random masking. These findings suggest that Aurora learns meteorological coherence and vertical structure without explicit instruction.
Emma Kasteleyn, Ana Lucic
Jul 15, 2026cs.CV

From Surface Forecasting to Observability Forecasting: A Latent World Model for Cloud-Aware EO Monitoring

The bottleneck of Earth Observation processing chains is not the arrival of new imagery but whether the surface is actually visible when the image arrives. We study this as an observability forecasting problem on EarthNet2021. Given recent multispectral imagery and exogenous weather drivers, the goal is to predict whether the next acquisition will be usable and, if not, when a usable view is likely to return. To do this, we adapt LeWorldModel, a joint-embedding predictive architecture world model, to cloud-aware Earth Observation sequences. The final pipeline converts raw minicubes into episodic HDF5 sequences with five image channels (blue, green, red, near-infrared, cloud mask) and eight meteorological and calendar covariates. The resulting model has 18.0M trainable parameters and is trained from scratch on 23,904 training episodes. The trained leWorldModel is evaluated under a locked protocol: linear probes are fit on train only, calibration choices are set on an internal validation split, and the fitted heads are then frozen for valsplit, IID, OOD, and extreme evaluation. On the full frozen-bundle observability benchmark, LeWorldModel consistently outperforms persistence. For next-step usability, balanced accuracy ranges from 0.769 to 0.887, compared with 0.493 to 0.556 for persistence. For exact first-usable-horizon prediction, accuracy ranges from 0.602 to 0.806, compared with 0.120 to 0.369 for persistence. Against a frozen LightGBM baseline fit on the same training windows, LeWorldModel is better on continuous clear/cloud regression and on exact recovery timing on valsplit, IID, and extreme, while LightGBM is stronger on the simpler binary any-usable-within-six task and is more robust on OOD. In separate sampled diagnostic analyses, LeWM also produces strong ranking-based anomaly signals under synthetic temporal inconsistencies.
Mohanad Albughdadi
Jul 21, 2026astro-ph.SR

A Deep Learning Framework for Predicting Solar EUV Irradiance During Significant Flares

We present FlareEUV, a multimodal deep learning framework for predicting daily extreme ultraviolet (EUV) irradiance at 6.5 nm over three consecutive days during significant solar flares, using multi-instrument observations from NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). We consider 33 significant flares in the period between 2011 and 2014 in Solar Cycle 24. The SDO observations include 13 co-aligned full-disk images, comprising eight AIA EUV/UV and five HMI magnetic/continuum products. FlareEUV learns the relationship between magnetic structure and coronal emission from the raw imaging data using a lightweight attention-based architecture. Our experimental results demonstrate the good performance of FlareEUV in short-term EUV irradiance forecasting during the significant flares and its superiority over baseline methods.
Sathvik Soman, Jason T. L. Wang, Haimin Wang +1