A perspective on fluid mechanical environments for challenges in reinforcement learning

Modeling and controlling fluids is critical across science and engineering. Effective flow control can increase lift, reduce drag, enhance mixing, and attenuate noise, potentially unlocking new technologies. Yet controlling fluids is hard: the dynamics are high-dimensional, nonlinear, and multiscale. While reinforcement learning (RL) has recently succeeded in robotics and protein folding through shared benchmarks, fluid dynamics has resisted such progress: each controller is typically tuned to a single geometry and operating point, making results hard to accumulate, transfer, and compare. We introduce HydroGym, a solver-independent RL platform for flow control, and show that standardized infrastructure unlocks transferable control intelligence across flow regimes. HydroGym provides 61+ validated environments spanning laminar to turbulent flows, with systematic Reynolds number progressions up to Re=400,000 and Mach number variations in 2D and 3D. It supports diverse backends, including finite-volume, spectral-element, finite-element, lattice-Boltzmann, and fully differentiable solvers for gradient-enhanced optimization. Across environments, RL agents consistently discover robust control principles, such as boundary-layer manipulation, acoustic-feedback disruption, and wake reorganization, yielding drag reductions exceeding 90% in canonical configurations. Critically, we demonstrate zero-shot transfer: agents trained only on a simplified channel flow achieve 38% friction-drag reduction on an unseen 3D wing section at chord Reynolds number Re=200,000 reducing exploration costs by four orders of magnitude versus direct on-wing optimization. This suggests RL agents uncover essential physics rather than configuration-specific patterns, pointing toward generalizable control. HydroGym offers extensible, scalable community infrastructure for fluid dynamics, machine learning, and control research.

Active flow control involves nonlinear dynamics, partial observations, and computationally expensive simulations, making controller design particularly challenging. Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has emerged as a powerful framework for such problems, but its success typically relies on large numbers of simulator interactions and produces neural-network policies whose decision process often remains difficult to interpret. In this work, we investigate a different paradigm: instead of optimizing neural-network parameters, we use modern coding agents to search directly for explicit executable feedback laws. We introduce a constrained heuristic-learning protocol in which an agent iteratively proposes, evaluates, and revises controller implementations while interacting exclusively through the public benchmark interface. The proposed framework is evaluated on 13 active flow-control benchmarks spanning one, two, and three-dimensional problems and compared against the strongest available DRL baselines under identical simulation budgets. The discovered heuristic controllers match or outperform the best DRL policy in 10 of the 13 environments while remaining compact, interpretable, and directly inspectable. Beyond aggregate performance, the resulting controllers reveal physically meaningful feedback mechanisms, transfer successfully across more challenging configurations, and remain competitive under varying Reynolds and Rayleigh numbers, actuator counts, and observation sparsity. These results suggest that heuristic learning through coding agents constitutes a credible and complementary alternative to conventional reinforcement learning, combining competitive performance with physically interpretable controller representations. Prompts and source code are available at https://github.com/DonsetPG/fluid-heuristic-learning.

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has received increasing attention and adoption in real-world use cases. Most of these systems follow a train-then-fix paradigm, where trained agents do not learn while interacting with the world until performance degrades and retraining becomes necessary. In this position paper, we argue that deploying an agent that is incapable of optimality, but receives an evaluative reward signal, is inherently a continual RL problem. We identify four sources of non-stationarity after deployment that necessitate never-ending learning, and highlight why the best deployed agents never stop adapting. We analyze successful examples of continual RL in the real world, and present the community with the advantages and measures to move away from the current train-then-fix paradigm.