Reinforcement Learning has become a standard paradigm for aligning Large Language Models with human intent and task requirements. While Group Relative Policy Optimization offers an efficient, value-model-free alternative to Proximal Policy Optimization, adapting it to real-world multi-reward settings remains challenging. Standard scalarization practices, such as Reward Combination and Advantage Combination, suffer from significant drawbacks: Reward Combination frequently generates advantages with excessively large squared magnitudes that lead to training instability, while Advantage Combination relies on static hyperparameters and ignores cross-objective correlations. To address these limitations, we propose Dynamic Variance-adaptive Advantage Optimization (DVAO), which dynamically adjusts combination weights based on the empirical reward variance of each objective within a rollout group, effectively up-weighting objectives with a stronger learning signal while suppressing noisy ones. We mathematically prove that DVAO maintains bounded advantage magnitudes for stable training and introduces a self-adaptive cross-objective regularization mechanism. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning and tool-use benchmarks using Qwen3 and Qwen2.5 models demonstrate that DVAO significantly outperforms baseline methods, achieving a superior multi-objective Pareto frontier and robust training stability.
As LLMs advance, post-training reinforcement learning (RL) increasingly relies on multi-dimensional rewards to cultivate comprehensive capabilities. This shift demands new algorithms capable of optimizing diverse and potentially competing objectives simultaneously. To address this, existing methods such as Group reward-Decoupled Policy Optimization (GDPO) decompose the overall score into independent reward groups, then compute the RL loss separately within each group. However, this strategy still encounters multi-reward conflicts: a single rollout can yield positive advantages on certain reward dimensions but negative ones on others, causing opposing signals to cancel each other out during aggregation, further hindering RL training efficiency. Inspired by Dynamic sAmpling Policy Optimization (DAPO), which improves RL training efficiency by filtering out ineffective rollouts with near-zero advantages, we propose Group-Dynamic reward-Decoupled Policy Optimization (GD2PO). Specifically, GD2PO employs a conflict-aware filtering mechanism to mask out rollouts suffering from severe reward-wise disagreement. By preventing conflicting signals from canceling each other out, this masking strategy preserves and enhances the magnitude of effective RL advantages, thereby significantly accelerating learning efficiency. Furthermore, we introduce query-level reweighting to dynamically adjust the update intensity of each query based on its overall reward consensus. Experiments on various multi-reward scenarios, including tool calling and human preference alignment, demonstrate that GD2PO consistently and significantly outperforms existing baselines. The code is available at https://github.com/Qwen-Applications/GD2PO.
Although multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) is central to aligning large language models with complex human preferences, the prevailing practice of static weighted summation overlooks a more fundamental phenomenon: reward learning is markedly asynchronous across objectives. Well-learned dimensions quickly produce homogeneous, low-variance signals whose residual noise contaminates the aggregated reward (in GRPO) or occupies a fixed share of the advantage budget (in GDPO), interfering with the scarce yet high-value signals carried by under-learned dimensions. To address this asynchrony, we propose Stage-Aware Dynamic Weighting (SAW), a lightweight, algorithm-agnostic dynamic weighting mechanism. SAW utilizes the coefficient of variation (CV) as a scale-invariant proxy for real-time informativeness, reweighting each dimension's reward or advantage contribution by its relative informativeness within the batch. Unlike gradient-based methods that require multiple forward and backward passes, SAW relies solely on batch-level statistics, introducing nearly negligible computational overhead. Experiments on tool-calling and text summarization tasks demonstrate that SAW consistently improves both training efficiency and final performance under both GRPO and GDPO frameworks, confirming it as a general-purpose plug-in for multi-reward LLM alignment. Our code is available at https://github.com/Zhaolutuan/SAW
Current critic-less RLHF methods aggregate multi-objective rewards via an arithmetic mean, leaving them vulnerable to constraint neglect: high-magnitude success in one objective can numerically offset critical failures in others (e.g., safety or formatting), masking low-performing "bottleneck" rewards vital for reliable multi-objective alignment. We propose Reward-Variance Policy Optimization (RVPO), a risk-sensitive framework that penalizes inter-reward variance during advantage aggregation, shifting the objective from "maximize sum" to "maximize consistency." We show via Taylor expansion that a LogSumExp (SoftMin) operator effectively acts as a smooth variance penalty. We evaluate RVPO on rubric-based medical and scientific reasoning with up to 17 concurrent LLM-judged reward signals (Qwen2.5-3B/7B/14B) and on tool-calling with rule-based constraints (Qwen2.5-1.5B/3B). By preventing the model from neglecting difficult constraints to exploit easier objectives, RVPO improves overall scores on HealthBench (0.261 vs. 0.215 for GDPO at 14B, p<0.001) and maintains competitive accuracy on GPQA-Diamond without the late-stage degradation observed in other multi-reward methods, demonstrating that variance regularization mitigates constraint neglect across model scales without sacrificing general capabilities.