cs.LGMay 26, 2026

Latent Recurrent Transformer: Architecture Exploration, Training Strategies, and Scaling Behavior

Authors: Zeyi HuangXuehai HeLiLiang RenYiping WangBaolin PengHao ChengShuohang WangPengcheng He+3 more

Organizations: Microsoft · University of Washington · University of Wisconsin-Madison

Abstract

We study Latent Recurrent Transformer (LRT), a lightweight augmentation of autoregressive transformers that reuses a high-level source-layer hidden state from the previous token as recurrent memory for the next token. Because this state is already computed during ordinary decoding, LRT introduces a cross-token, cross-layer latent pathway while preserving the standard attention mechanism, KV-cache interface, and one model forward per generated token. To pretrain this recurrence without sequentially unrolling the full sequence, we introduce interleaved parallel training: one full-sequence initialization forward constructs a shared buffer, followed by sequential refinement of disjoint position subsets with parallel computation within each subset. This provides every token with recurrent-memory-aware supervision at approximately 2x ideal token compute. Across 1.3B- and 2.1B-parameter nanochat-style backbones and a wide range of training budgets, LRT improves both BPB and CORE under matched effective compute. Additionally, LRT outperforms two-forward PonderLM-2 and matches a three-loop Transformer in BPB, while retaining one-forward-per-token decoding with 9% latency overhead over the standard Transformer.

Explore similar work

Apr 23, 2026cs.LG

The Recurrent Transformer: Greater Effective Depth and Efficient Decoding

Transformers process tokens in parallel but are temporally shallow: at position tt, each layer attends to key-value pairs computed based on the previous layer, yielding a depth capped by the number of layers. Recurrent models offer unbounded temporal depth but suffer from optimization instability and historically underutilize modern accelerators. We introduce the Recurrent Transformer, a simple architectural change where each layer attends to key-value pairs computed off its own activations, yielding layerwise recurrent memory while preserving standard autoregressive decoding cost. We show that the architecture can emulate both (i) a conventional Transformer and (ii) token-to-token recurrent updates under mild assumptions, while avoiding optimization instability. Naively, prefill/training appears bandwidth-bound with effective arithmetic intensity near 11 because keys and values are revealed sequentially; we give an exact tiling-based algorithm that preserves the mathematical computation while reducing HBM traffic from Θ(N2)Θ(N^2) to Θ(NlogN)Θ(N\log N), increasing effective arithmetic intensity to Θ(N/logN)Θ(N/\log N) for sequence length NN. On 150M and 300M parameter C4 pretraining, Recurrent Transformers improve cross-entropy over a parameter-matched Transformer baseline and achieve the improvement with fewer layers (fixed parameters), suggesting that recurrence can trade depth for width, thus reducing KV cache memory footprint and inference latency.
Costin-Andrei Oncescu, Depen Morwani, Samy Jelassi +3
Sep 15, 2026cs.CL

Persistent Recurrent Memory Between Transformer Layers - Improves Language Model Generalization

We introduce a simple architectural modification to decoder-only transformers: a persistent recurrent state that observes hidden representations via cross-attention, updates itself through a GRU, and modulates subsequent processing via gated addition. Inserted between the lower and upper halves of a 6-layer transformer, this module adds only 3.7% additional parameters while reducing evaluation loss from 2.438±0.0042.438 \pm 0.004 to 1.743±0.0181.743 \pm 0.018, corresponding to a 28.5% reduction on held-out language modeling data. The improvement is statistically significant across 5 random seeds (p<0.01p < 0.01) and corresponds to reduced overfitting (generalization gap 0.12 vs 0.26). Through controlled ablations, we demonstrate that the improvement stems entirely from the persistent memory topology, not from auxiliary self-prediction objectives. A model with identical topology but no auxiliary loss performs equivalently, while a random auxiliary loss provides no benefit. Representation probing reveals that the persistent state encodes narrative position (52% vs 33% chance level)---information that standard attention maintains less efficiently. Our results suggest that bridging transformer layers with a lightweight recurrent memory is a simple, effective approach to improving generalization in small-scale language models.
Eduardo Novaes Hering
Aug 9, 2026cs.AI

Full-bandwidth transformer

Autoregressive transformers compute along two axes: horizontally across generated tokens, and vertically through model depth. Dense attention gives each token broad horizontal access to the past, but the vertical feedback channel between decoding steps remains narrow: only the sampled token returns to the bottom of the stack, while the top-layer hidden state is discarded. We introduce the \emph{full-bandwidth transformer}, which widens this channel with \emph{latent feedback}: at each decoding step, the previous top-layer hidden state is fused with the sampled token embedding through a gated linear unit and fed back as the next input. Latent feedback lets non-verbalized computation re-enter the stack with a renewed depth budget, while preserving the standard transformer architecture, KV cache, and language-modeling objective. To train full-bandwidth transformers without losing parallel teacher forcing, we use a scheduled multi-pass objective that introduces latent feedback late in pretraining and mixes a small fraction of deeper feedback passes for stability. We train 1B-parameter full-bandwidth transformers up to 400B tokens and find that latent feedback improves validation loss, 5-shot language-model evaluation, math and coding generation, and instruction-tuned performance. With negligible per-token decoding overhead, full-bandwidth transformers match or approach standard transformers trained with roughly 1.5×1.5\times more tokens, and manage to produce shorter reasoning traces at equal or better accuracy.
Xi Wang, Ziyang Cai, Zheng Zhan +5