We develop semiparametrically efficient inference for kernel measures of noise heterogeneity in additive noise models. In many applications, the regression function is estimated using flexible machine learning methods. Downstream procedures based on the resulting residuals can then inherit first-stage bias: regression error may induce spurious dependence between covariates and residuals, invalidating the assumptions needed for standard analysis. We construct a novel Hilbert-valued one-step estimator of the kernel covariance operator between covariates and residuals. Our estimator yields bootstrap-calibrated tests for residual independence and goodness of fit in additive noise models, while also providing asymptotically efficient confidence intervals for the kernel dependence measure under noise heterogeneity. The framework extends to settings with additional covariates, enabling inference on distributional heterogeneity of residual noise across treatment groups. Simulations show improved calibration and power relative to naive plug-in residual methods.
We consider the problem of two-sample testing in a semi-supervised setting with abundant unlabeled covariate data. Standard two-sample tests neglect covariate information, which has the potential to significantly boost performance. However, incorporating covariates potentially breaks the exchangeability assumption under the null, which further complicates a calibration procedure. To address these issues, we propose a semi-supervised method that produces a test statistic with asymptotic normality, while effectively integrating additional information from covariates. Our test is straightforward to calibrate due to the asymptotic normality under the null and achieves asymptotic power that is often much higher than existing kernel tests without covariates. Furthermore, we formally show that the proposed method is consistent in power against fixed and local alternatives. Simulations confirm the practical and theoretical strengths of our approach.
Providing non-conservative uncertainty quantification for function estimates derived from noisy observations remains a fundamental challenge in statistical machine learning, particularly for applications in safety-critical domains. In this work, we propose novel non-asymptotic probabilistic uniform error bounds for kernel-based regression. Compared to related bounds in the literature that are restricted to (conditionally) independent sub-Gaussian noise, our bounds allow to consider a broad class of non-Gaussian distributions, such as sub-Gaussian, bounded, sub-exponential, and variance/moment-bounded noise. Moreover, our results apply to correlated and uncorrelated noise. We compare our proposed error bounds with existing results in terms of the induced uncertainty region and their performance in safe control, demonstrating the tightness of the proposed bounds.
Johannes Teutsch, Oleksii Molodchyk, Marion Leibold +2
Adversarial training can improve the robustness of predictive models to bounded perturbations, often at the cost of statistical efficiency. We study this trade-off in kernel regression over a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). It is shown that, under squared loss, adversarial training in RKHS introduces a term involving the product of the function norm with the mean absolute value of the response noise, which we call the \textit{noise premium}. Our analysis shows that the noise premium makes the prediction error of adversarial training converge strictly more slowly than the nonparametric minimax benchmark even after balancing approximation and estimation errors. Moreover, for a fixed perturbation budget, once the budget exceeds a certain threshold, the solution to adversarial training collapses to the zero function. To mitigate these effects of the noise premium, we propose noise-debiased adversarial training. The resulting noise-debiased estimator can attain the minimax optimal rate up to a logarithmic factor for the prediction error, raises the collapse threshold, and admits an explicit bound on the increase in adversarial loss. Numerical experiments on synthetic and real data support the theoretical findings and validate the effectiveness of the proposed noise-debiased method.