What Frozen VLAs Already Know About Success: A Probing Study of Value-Like Structure in Foundation Robot Policies

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models acquire broad embodied capabilities through large-scale pretraining, yet their generalization remains far more fragile than that of LLMs and VLMs. The prevailing remedy, post-training via supervised fine-tuning or reinforcement learning, improves task-specific performance but narrows the generalist capability that makes pretraining valuable. We identify a key bottleneck: VLA failures stem not only from action generation but also from action evaluation. A diagnostic pass@k study confirms that frozen VLAs already contain competent behaviors in their output distribution, with overall success rates rising from 33% at pass@1 to 92% at pass@32. Inspired by this, we propose SVA (Search, Value, and Act), a simple framework that equips frozen VLA policies with long-term consequence awareness. SVA first uses Monte-Carlo tree search in simulation to fully explore the VLA's output distribution and collect diverse trajectories annotated with empirical returns; this knowledge is then distilled into a lightweight Q-value model that predicts the expected consequence of candidate actions; at deployment, the frozen VLA proposes multiple candidates and the evaluator selects the one with the highest uncertainty-regularized Q-value, requiring no simulator access. By decoupling action proposal from consequence evaluation, SVA preserves the generalization capacity of the VLA backbone while substantially improving task success rates. Experiments across embodied benchmarks show that SVA consistently improves generalization on unseen tasks and exhibits strong test-time scaling behavior. Strikingly, SVA enables a 9B VLA to outperform a 27B VLA by 7 points at 27% lower inference latency, suggesting that scaling test-time evaluation is more cost-effective than scaling model size.

Frozen vision-language-action (VLA) policies generate temporally extended action chunks, but long-horizon manipulation remains vulnerable to accumulated execution error and visual aliasing across task stages. Successful rollouts provide useful corrective evidence, yet current frame retrieval can return progress-misaligned actions,while direct replay or time-domain fusion can overwrite the reactive structure of the policy proposal. We introduce Retrieve in Time, Correct in Frequency (RTCF), a training-free test-time correction framework that improves frozen VLA performance with low model-side overhead.RTCF separates which experience to retrieve from which part of its action to transfer. Progressive Memory Alignment (PMA) causally aligns the growing visual execution history with complete successful trajectories through incrementally updated monotonic frontiers, jointly identifying a relevant memory and the current aligned memory position without stage labels. From the aligned action chunk,RTCF transfers a coefficient-wise-clipped low-frequency residual on motion channels. Higher-frequency components and gripper decisions remain inherited from the frozen policy. Across four LIBERO suites and 2,000 episodes per condition, RTCF raises aggregate success from 86.4% to 88.4% and improves LIBERO-Long from 61.6% to 68.6%.These gains require no parameter updates, repeated VLA inference, or additional GPU resources: correction can be performed on the client CPU after a single policy invocation, and the median latencies sum to only 10.99 ms per action chunk

Vision-language-action models (VLAs) are moving rapidly towards deployment as general-purpose manipulation policies, but we currently lack basic tools for understanding what these models represent internally or for monitoring them at runtime. Leveraging ideas from mechanistic interpretability, we probe the residual stream of $π_{0.5}$ and find that task progress, the normalized time remaining in a trajectory, is linearly readable from the activations. We find that this signal is present in the pretrained PaliGemma backbone prior to training on any robot-specific data. A single linear probe generalizes to unseen tasks and varies under language counterfactuals when trained on multi-prompt data, but does not enable meaningful steering of the policy. These properties make the signal directly useful for instrumenting deployed VLAs. We use the probe as a simple label-free OOD detector, which detects stalled task progress, and find it competitive with state-of-the-art methods. Our results suggest that VLAs have rich, linearly readable internal representations of semantic quantities like task progress, and that learning to read these signals offers a lightweight, interpretable path toward monitoring deployed visuomotor policies.