A Modular Architecture for Typologically Controlled Lexicon Generation
Organizations: Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani Pilani, Rajasthan 333031, India
Abstract
Constructing artificial lexicons that are pronounceable, typologically plausible, and semantically structured remains an open challenge in computational linguistics. Existing conlang generators either lack formal phonotactic guarantees or delegate generation to opaque, non-reproducible LLM-based pipelines. We propose a modular framework that samples phoneme inventories from PHOIBLE, generates word forms under interchangeable phonological grammars (deterministic, OT, and MaxEnt), and assigns meanings via a Swadesh--Leipzig--Jakarta ontology with explicit form--meaning alignment. Evaluation on character -gram perplexity, log-likelihood, and KL divergence against PHOIBLE across lexicon sizes of 100-5,000 forms shows that probabilistic grammars consistently outperform deterministic and random baselines on both phonotactic coherence and typological realism.
Figures & tables
| System | Inventory Source | Word Form Generation | Phonotactics | Semantics | Typological Grounding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heyer (2021) | User-defined templates | Template sampling | Hard rule filters (user-specified) | None | None |
| Cai & Martens (2023) | Designer-specified parameters | Syllable template expansion | Configurable rules; no formal grammar | None | None |
| Goldwater & Johnson (2003) | Real language phoneme sets | MaxEnt-ranked OT candidates | MaxEnt over ranked OT constraints | None | None |
| Hayes & Wilson (2008) | Real phoneme inventories | MaxEnt-weighted candidate selection | Maximum Entropy with learned constraint weights | None | None |
| Futrell et al. (2017) | Real lexicons (14 languages) | Bayesian generative model (stochastic memoization) | Probabilistic; phonological feature hierarchy | None | Multi-lingual; no typological sampling |
| Pimentel et al. (2020) | Real lexicons (106 languages) | Not generative; complexity measurement only | LSTM / trigram LM; bits-per-phoneme measure | None | Cross-linguistic comparison; no inventory sampling |
| Relationship | Statistic | Value | p -value |
| Consonant count vs. ejective presence | |||
| Consonant count vs. click presence | |||
| Inventory size vs. click presence | |||
| Vowel count vs. vowel length contrast | |||
| Ejective uvular | |||
| Pharyngeal uvular |
| Implication | Total | Violations | Failure Rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pharyngeal uvular | ||||
| Nasal vowel oral vowel | ||||
| Voiced obs. voiceless obs. | ||||
| Fricative stop | ||||
| Front rounded front unrounded |
Linguistic Typology
Linguistic typology compares languages to identify patterns in their sounds, grammar, meaning, and history.
See all 26 papers