Seeing Before Agreeing: Aligning Multi-Agent Consensus with Visual Evidence

Vision-language model (VLM) agents combine specialized perception, tools, and reasoning to address complex visual tasks. In multi-agent settings, different agents inspect different image regions, video frames, or visual representations, so collaboration extends beyond distributed reasoning to distributed perception. This makes shared visual context a central problem in VLM agent collaboration. In this paper, we frame memory hierarchy, cross-agent sharing, and consistency mechanisms around the need to reconcile interpretations and update dependent reasoning. Effective collaboration requires agents to build on contributions from other agents, recover missing visual context, and reconcile differing interpretations as new evidence emerges. Shared visual memory preserves not only images or textual summaries but also the dependencies among observations, agent interpretations, and subsequent reasoning. Together, these design considerations shape how information flows and evolves across VLM agents. The proposed framework provides a foundation for building reliable and resource-efficient agent teams.

Visual Question Answering (VQA) with Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) requires not only producing safe and effective responses, but also grounding safety decisions in the multimodal evidence that determines risk. Recent safety-alignment methods improve refusal behavior and contextual risk awareness, yet correct safety outcomes may still rely on superficial textual or visual correlations, particularly when risk emerges from interactions between individually benign image and question content. To address this issue, we propose A$^2$Safe, a counterfactual evidence-aligned adaptive agent collaboration framework for safe and effective VQA. A$^2$Safe organizes localized visual observations, textual intent, and cross-modal risk relations through a Grounded Safety Evidence Board, making the basis of safety decisions explicit. Counterfactual safety evidence alignment enforces invariance to safety-irrelevant changes while requiring appropriate safety-state and response-mode transitions when risk-critical evidence is minimally altered. The resulting evidence state further supports adaptive collaboration, enabling direct answering when grounded evidence is sufficient and invoking policy critique and response revision when evidence is risky, uncertain, or conflicting. Under complementary safety-critical and general VQA protocols, A$^2$Safe achieves a 95.72 SIUO safety score, reduces the benign refusal rate on MOSSBench to 14.67%, and maintains an average general VQA score of 78.34 with 27.8% token overhead. These results support counterfactual evidence-aligned adaptive collaboration for safe and effective multimodal question answering.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) integrate strong text reasoning with visual inputs, yet their responses can be inconsistent with the underlying images, indicating ineffective utilization of visual evidence during inference. The prevailing training paradigm relies on large-scale caption-based pretraining for general alignment, followed by supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning to enable instruction following and complex reasoning. However, such pretraining provides only weak visual grounding: short, coarse captions bias models toward salient objects while neglecting fine-grained visual evidence. In this paper, we introduce Visual Evidence Pre-Alignment (VEPA), an intermediate stage between pretraining and post-training that explores a novel sufficiency-driven objective with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to optimize question-conditioned visual evidence descriptions. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks show that our VEPA consistently enhances performance on visually demanding evaluations and complements standard supervised post-training. Further analyses show that the income stems from strengthened, transferable visual grounding, rather than from additional task-specific training.