math.OCJun 1, 2026

MINTS: Minimalist Thompson Sampling

Authors: Kaizheng Wang

Organizations: Department of IEOR and Data Science Institute, Columbia University.

Abstract

The Bayesian paradigm offers principled tools for sequential decision-making under uncertainty, but its reliance on a probabilistic model for all parameters can hinder the incorporation of complex structural constraints. We introduce a minimalist Bayesian framework that places a prior only on the location of the optimum, while eliminating nuisance parameters through profile likelihood. This yields a generalized posterior that naturally accommodates structural constraints. As a direct instantiation, we develop MINimalist Thompson Sampling (MINTS). For multi-armed bandits with mean constraints, we establish near-optimal non-asymptotic regret guarantees and sharp almost-sure asymptotic regret characterizations. In particular, MINTS attains the classical Lai--Robbins constant in the unstructured setting and automatically adapts to unimodal structure, achieving the sharp constant determined only by the immediate neighbors of the optimal arm.

Explore similar work

Jul 14, 2026stat.ML

Thompson Sampling Is 2-Competitive for Mistakes

We consider Bayesian bandit models and prove that Thompson sampling makes at most twice the expected number of mistakes (selections of a suboptimal arm) as any other policy. Our analysis applies as long as the latent arm processes are independent and each arm evolves only when played. For stochastic bandits with best arm defined via mean reward, this confirms a conjecture of Guha and Munagala from 2014, where the factor 22 is already best possible. The result holds under any nonincreasing sequence of round weights, including fixed horizon and geometric discounting.
Mark Sellke, Gregory Valiant
Jan 5, 2026cs.LG

Prior Diffusiveness and Regret in the Linear-Gaussian Bandit

We prove that Thompson sampling exhibits O~(σdT+drTr(Σ0))\tilde{O}(σd \sqrt{T} + d r \sqrt{\mathrm{Tr}(Σ_0)}) Bayesian regret in the linear-Gaussian bandit with a N(μ0,Σ0)\mathcal{N}(μ_0, Σ_0) prior distribution on the coefficients, where dd is the dimension, TT is the time horizon, rr is the maximum 2\ell_2 norm of the actions, and σ2σ^2 is the noise variance. In contrast to existing regret bounds, this shows that to within logarithmic factors, the prior-dependent burn-in'' term $d r \sqrt{\mathrm{Tr}(Σ_0)}$ decouples additively from the minimax (long run) regret $σd \sqrt{T}$. Previous regret bounds exhibit a multiplicative dependence on these terms. We establish these results via a new elliptical potential'' lemma, and also provide a lower bound indicating that the burn-in term is unavoidable.
Yifan Zhu, John C. Duchi, Benjamin Van Roy
Sep 11, 2026cs.LG

Thompson Sampling for Non-Monotone Convex Ridge Bandits: Monotonicity Is Not Needed for Polynomial Regret

Bakhtiari, Lattimore and Szepesv'ari (COLT 2025) proved that Thompson sampling (TS) has Bayesian regret O~(d5/2n)\tilde O(d^{5/2}\sqrt n) for bandit convex optimisation with convex \emph{monotone} ridge losses f(x)=(\ipxθ)f(x)=\ell(\ip{x}{\theta}), and asked whether monotonicity of the link is necessary. We give a qualitative negative answer. For every prior on [0,1][0,1]-valued, 11-Lipschitz convex ridge losses with an arbitrary convex, possibly non-monotone, link, and for any fixed measurable selection of minimisers, exact-posterior TS has Bayesian regret O((d+1)4dnlog(e+ndmax{1,\diamK}))=O~(d9/2n)O\big((d+1)^4\sqrt{dn}\,\log(e+nd\max\{1,\diam K\})\big)=\tilde O(d^{9/2}\sqrt n). The monotone proof relies on a single-removal John-ellipsoid dichotomy; we show by an explicit twelve-point configuration that this dichotomy fails for non-monotone links, and replace it by an O(d2)O(d^2) cardinality bound for ``uninformative'' configurations. The bound uses a Boolean rounding argument: a 00-11 matrix within 1/(4r)1/(4r) in max-norm of a rank-rr matrix has rank at most 2r12r-1. We construct d(d+1)d(d+1) uninformative losses, showing that the cardinality bound is tight up to constants in the large-diameter-to-gap regime, and give a self-contained information-ratio-to-regret transfer that is uniform over fixed measurable selections. Whether the d5/2d^{5/2} dependence of the monotone case can be retained remains open.
Xuan Li