Market-Based Replanning for Safety-Critical UAV Swarms in Search and Rescue Missions

Autonomous UAV swarms require scalable coordination mechanisms that maintain mission performance under limited communication, environmental uncertainty, and component failures. Centralized approaches provide global coordination but suffer from communication bottlenecks and single-node vulnerabilities, whereas fully decentralized methods often lack mission-level consistency. This paper presents Layered Autonomous Edge Intelligence (LAEI), a UAV-swarm framework that combines onboard learned policies with lightweight mission-level supervision. Each UAV performs local perception, obstacle avoidance, and action selection onboard, while the supervisory layer provides adaptive goal reassignment, fault-aware recovery, and context-dependent policy guidance without directly controlling low-level actions. LAEI further incorporates recovery strategies, including dynamic reassociation, backup supervisory support, and fallback local autonomy, to maintain mission continuity under representative failure scenarios. We evaluate LAEI in simulated UAV-swarm scenarios using mission completion time, collision rate, and coverage efficiency. The results show that LAEI reduces mission completion time and improves operational efficiency while maintaining collision-aware distributed UAV-level decision-making.

Deploying multiple UAVs for remote sensing enables proportional reductions in mission time, but realizing these benefits requires the fleet to coordinate at runtime: distributing sensing targets, responding to platform failures, and recovering from degraded data quality. In inspection campaigns, where mission value depends on complete coverage and the usability of every capture, a centralized ground-station coordinator is a single point of failure: a lost link or station fault leaves sensing gaps that cannot be filled without operator intervention. We propose the \textbf{SwarmLink}, an inter-agent communication infrastructure that non-invasively extends any existing aerial framework with peer-to-peer coordination capability, without modifying the host system. We apply it to photovoltaic plant inspection as a representative large-scale sensing campaign, extending Aerostack2 with a distributed auction that unifies initial sensing-target allocation, platform-failure recovery, and data-quality-triggered reassignment into a single runtime mechanism. All three disruption scenarios reduce to the same re-auction over remaining targets and active platforms, requiring zero modifications to the Aerostack2 core and no ground-station involvement during the mission.

Multi-Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) disaster-response systems require coordinated task assignment and local trajectory control, yet the individual and combined contributions of these coordination layers to mission efficiency and operational safety remain insufficiently characterised under controlled experimental conditions. TriSAR is evaluated as a five-UAV coordination system operating in a physics-based Gazebo simulation of an earthquake-damaged urban environment. A 2 x 2 factorial design compares two task-allocation strategies (Genetic Algorithm and greedy fitness-based allocation) with reactive collision avoidance enabled or disabled. Each of the four configurations was evaluated over 30 stochastic episodes in a common scenario of five UAVs and eight targets. Under greedy allocation, enabling repulsion eliminated recorded collision-threshold violations, confirmed by a Mann-Whitney test (U = 885, p = 4.03 x 10^-12, rank-biserial r = 0.97). Under GA allocation, the same protective effect was confirmed (U = 675, p = 1.26 x 10^-5, rank-biserial r = 0.50). For mission-efficiency metrics, GA-based allocation showed no statistically detectable advantage over greedy allocation when repulsion was enabled, but a significant advantage in steps, path length, and energy when repulsion was disabled (Welch's t-tests, |g| between 0.92 and 1.76). These results show that reactive repulsion provides a substantial, allocation-dependent safety benefit, while the additional computational complexity of GA-based task allocation yields a detectable mission-efficiency benefit only when repulsion is disabled.