REGAIN: REconciliation GAIN-driven Auxiliary Direction Learning

Direct forecasting has become a standard paradigm for multivariate time-series forecasting because it predicts the full future horizon in a single pass. However, its training objective is often still decomposed into pointwise errors such as MSE. Such objectives provide stable supervision, but they do not explicitly preserve the structure of the future trajectory: temporal coherence within each variable and relational consistency across variables can both be weakened. We propose CoRe, a model-agnostic learning objective for direct multivariate forecasting. CoRe replaces pointwise supervision with two output-space constraints: a frequency coherence loss that aligns predicted and target spectra, and a low-rank relational graph loss that matches sampled pairwise differences in a target-derived PCA subspace. The resulting objective introduces no trainable parameters and can be applied to existing forecasting backbones by changing only the loss. Experiments on standard benchmarks show that CoRe improves strong baselines, compares favorably with recent forecasting objectives, and remains effective across different backbones, datasets, and hyperparameter settings overall consistently.

Forecasters often score the same units per date against one standardized realized outcome. We show that every standardized forecast splits exactly into a component aligned with this common target and a component uncorrelated with it. Three consequences follow: forecast-error correlation largely mirrors forecast correlation and is therefore a poor measure of diversity; an equally weighted combination beats a no-information forecast only when average alignment is large relative to the combination's dispersion; and the gain from adding a forecaster separates into genuine improvement and mere dilution, which equal-weight admission can mistakenly reward. We develop a cautious selection rule, study it in simulations, and apply it to language-model forecasts of US equity rankings and mechanical signals ranking exchange-traded funds. Selection removes most dilution losses, but no combination beats the no-information forecast.

Accurate and coherent passenger demand forecasting is essential for Urban Rail Transit (URT) operations. Passenger demand has a hierarchical structure in which origin-destination (OD) flows aggregate to station-level inflows and outflows through conservation constraints. In practice, station-level and OD-level forecasts are often generated independently, producing incoherent predictions that violate these constraints and introduce inconsistencies into operational decision-making. Such issues become more severe during disruptions, when forecasting reliability is most critical. This paper presents the first hierarchical forecast reconciliation framework for joint station-level and OD-level URT demand prediction. A neural Fully Connected Reconciler (FCR) learns a non-linear mapping from incoherent base forecasts to coherent hierarchical predictions while guaranteeing exact structural consistency by construction. The method is benchmarked against OLS, WLS, and Minimum Trace (MinT) variants using Rejsekort smart-card data from the Copenhagen S-train network under one-step, multi-step, and disruption forecasting scenarios. Results show that reconciliation consistently improves OD forecasting accuracy while ensuring hierarchical coherence. Under normal conditions, FCR performs competitively with MinT-based methods. An oracle analysis indicates that perfect station-level forecasts could reduce OD prediction error by up to 34 percent, highlighting the value of improved base forecasts. Under severe disruptions, FCR outperforms classical methods, reducing OD forecasting error by up to 17.45 percent in multi-step destination-side delay scenarios. These findings establish hierarchical reconciliation as an effective mechanism for improving forecast robustness, with the largest benefits occurring under the most challenging operating conditions.