Beyond Symmetric Alignment: Spectral Diagnostics of Modality Imbalance in Vision-Language Models in the Medical Domain

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly proposed for clinical decision support, yet their reliability in real-world scenarios that require integrating both visual and textual context from medical records remains poorly characterized. This paper identifies three failure modes: (1) modality over-reliance on text over images, (2) spurious reliance on irrelevant clinical history, and (3) prompt sensitivity across semantically equivalent inputs. We evaluate a diverse set of general-domain and medically-tuned open and closed VLMs on chest x-ray tasks using MIMIC-CXR. By systematically manipulating image-text alignment, clinical history, and prompt formulations, we found that VLM decisions are dominated by the text modality, even when visual evidence is available. Moreover, we observed that VLMs are heavily influenced by irrelevant reports, while minor prompt changes can reverse correct image-based predictions. Our findings underscore the need for explicit safeguards and stress-testing before considering the use of these models in clinical practice.

Vision-language pre-training (VLP) serves as a cornerstone for medical multimodal representation learning. However, existing medical VLP frameworks are often constrained by the limited context windows and shallow representational capacities of lightweight text encoders when processing lengthy, terminology-dense clinical reports. While integrating medical large language models (LLMs) offers unprecedented clinical reasoning capabilities, it introduces three major bottlenecks: (i) the anisotropic representational collapse of generative LLMs under standard contrastive objectives, (ii) the prohibitive memory overhead of joint end-to-end training with large batch sizes, and (iii) the medical hallucinations induced by vanilla contrastive losses that ignore fine-grained anatomical laterality and negation modifiers. To address these challenges, we propose \textbf{SCALPEL}, a \textbf{S}emantic \textbf{C}ross-modal \textbf{A}lignment framework via \textbf{L}LM-\textbf{P}owered \textbf{E}ncoder \textbf{L}earning. First, Clinical Report Contrastive fine-tuning converts a generative LLM into an isotropic encoder via domain-specific clinical text adaptation. Second, an asymmetric alignment strategy leverages offline feature caching to enable efficient training. Critically, we formulate an Anatomy-Negation Aware Objective that explicitly penalizes mismatched image-text pairs involving laterality confusion or false negations. Extensive experiments across MIMIC-CXR, CheXpert, and IU X-Ray benchmarks demonstrate that SCALPEL achieves state-of-the-art performance in cross-modal retrieval, zero-shot disease classification and medical visual question answering.

Medical Vision-Language Models (Med-VLMs) have achieved expert-level proficiency in interpreting diagnostic imaging. However, current models are predominantly trained on professional literature, limiting their ability to communicate findings in the lay register required for patient-centered care. While text-centric research has actively developed resources for simplifying medical jargon, there is a critical absence of large-scale multimodal benchmarks designed to facilitate lay-accessible medical image understanding. To bridge this resource gap, we introduce MedLayBench-V, the first large-scale multimodal benchmark dedicated to expert-lay semantic alignment. Unlike naive simplification approaches that risk hallucination, our dataset is constructed via a Structured Concept-Grounded Refinement (SCGR) pipeline. This method enforces strict semantic equivalence by integrating Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Concept Unique Identifiers (CUIs) with micro-level entity constraints. MedLayBench-V provides a verified foundation for training and evaluating next-generation Med-VLMs capable of bridging the communication divide between clinical experts and patients.