Handwriting Extraction and Analysis of Signature Lists in Swiss Popular Initiatives
Authors: Marco Peer, Thomas Gorges, Mathias Seuret, Vincent Christlein, Andreas Fischer
Abstract
Popular initiatives and referendums are central to Swiss democracy, yet the validation of handwritten signature lists remains a labor-intensive manual process. This paper investigates the potential of automated document analysis methods, including OCR and AI-based handwriting analysis, to support this task. We propose a pipeline combining template-based line segmentation with text recognition and writer retrieval techniques, evaluated on a dataset of 443 handwritten entries from 418 writers. Results show that OCR struggles with out-of-vocabulary handwriting, with a CER of 29.6% for first names. In contrast, writer retrieval performs more robustly, reaching an mAP of 50.6%. Furthermore, our experiments indicate that off-the-shelf OCR systems are not sufficiently reliable for transcription of handwritten signature data, particularly for short, out-of-vocabulary entries such as names or addresses. However, writer retrieval methods can effectively identify visually similar entries across signature lists, making them a suitable tool for supporting the detection of potential duplicate submissions based on handwriting similarity.
Offline handwritten signature verification aims to distinguish genuine from forged signatures using static images. Since real forgeries are rarely available, negative samples are usually randomly drawn from genuine signatures of other users to create training data. However, this random selection often lacks diversity, increases redundancy, and escalates computational cost, leading to inefficient training. We propose a data-driven strategy to generate diverse, informative negative samples using prototypical signatures, which are compact, non-identifiable summaries of genuine signature features. Based on the experiments results, we conclude that (i) prototypical signatures yield more informative negative samples, improving the detection of skilled forgeries; (ii) the proposed approach is backbone-agnostic, showing robustness across architectures; and (iii) when combined with a primal-form linear SVM, it serves as an alternative to RBF-based models while significantly improving scalability and computational efficiency. Implementation of the method is available at https://github.com/kdmoura/proto_hsv.
Kecia G. de Moura, Robert Sabourin, Rafael M. O. Cruz
Handwritten signature verification is vital for personal authentication across commercial and financial applications. Although deep learning methods are widely adopted for online signature verification (OSV), they often struggle with capturing highly discriminative features and modelling long-range dependencies. To address these issues, we propose a novel framework that integrates the augmented path signature (APS) descriptor with the T-Mamba model. The APS descriptor first applies time and basepoint augmentations, then computes sliding-window path signatures. The path signature is a non-parametric feature map from rough path theory that effectively captures geometric structures and nonlinear inter-channel interactions. Inspired by the efficacy of state space models (SSMs) in sequence modelling, our T-Mamba model employs a hybrid design combining two temporal convolutional network (TCN) blocks with a time-scanning Mamba. This design enables the model to learn both local temporal patterns and global long-range dependencies, substantially improving verification accuracy. Our framework achieves state-of-the-art EERs on three public benchmark datasets (MCYT-100, SVC-2004 Task 2, DeepSignDB), validating its effectiveness and robustness, especially when the training data is limited. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/DLRL04/OSV-using-APS-and-T-Mamba.
The personal archive of Konstantin Tsiolkovsky (1857-1935) is held as fond 555 of the Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The archive scanned the fond and published the images, but with no queryable catalogue, no full-text search and no dataset: the holdings can only be browsed one page at a time. This paper describes a machine-readable catalogue of all 2,019 files and 51,008 scans, a dating for 1,969 files taken from the archive's own descriptions, a page-level classification of every scan into handwriting and typescript, and a growing corpus of machine transcriptions (currently 322 files, 5,454 scans). It also reports a way to measure handwritten-text-recognition accuracy in an archive with no ground truth. Archives of the typewriter era often preserve one text twice, as manuscript and as a typed copy; transcribing both and comparing isolates the reading error, since source and pipeline are identical and only page difficulty differs. Across 294 such pairs from 27 files, two readings of a handwritten page agree on a median 37% of words. On two files that also have a published edition the estimate can be checked against ground truth: it is unbiased to within a percentage point and ranks pages as the truth does (rank correlation 0.92 where the edition is a faithful witness). This bounds use: two variants of one work here share 19% of words, below the rate at which two readings of a single page agree, so the redactions cannot be collated word by word at this quality. That negative result is reported as such, and the constraint is built into the tool.