Learning to Contest: Decentralized Robust Fairness in Cooperative MARL via Cross-Attention

Can Savcı

cs.MAJun 4, 2026

Learning to Contest: Decentralized Robust Fairness in Cooperative MARL via Cross-Attention

Authors: Can Savcı

Organizations: Independent Researcher Izmir, Turkey

Abstract

Fair cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) teams that maximize an egalitarian welfare are exploitable: a single self-interested agent free-rides on the surplus that fair agents forgo to raise the worst-off, and the known remedy is a centralized need-based allocator. We show that a decentralized defense becomes possible once contention is graded: when a contested resource still delivers a fraction $1-c$ , a worst-off cooperator that contests a free-rider strictly improves on yielding, so leverage exists for every $c < 1$ . We introduce CAN, a permutation-equivariant cross-attention policy over agents' observed behaviour that infers how many free-riders are present and responds proportionally -- turn-taking when none, contesting just enough when some. Trained against an adversarial league, CAN keeps best-response exploitability near the centralized oracle ( $ρ\approx 1.2\text{--}1.5$ vs. $ρ= N$ unprotected) at essentially no efficiency cost, whereas the fair-MARL learners (GGF, FEN, SOTO) each collapse to an exploitable or wasteful extreme. Giving those objectives CAN's identical adversarial training does not rescue them, so the objective -- not adversarial training alone -- is what makes hardening possible. Against a committed (non-adaptive) defector, every learned defense including ours provides deterrence rather than immunity, weakening as the leverage $(1-c)/2$ vanishes. Across further environments and team sizes the same principle sets the scope: robustness holds exactly as far as the game's contest leverage reaches, and we map that boundary rather than claim to remove it.

Explore similar work

May 18, 2026cs.LG

Interaction-Breaking Adversarial Learning Framework for Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Cooperation is central to multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), yet learned coordination can be fragile when external perturbations disrupt inter-agent interactions. Prior robust MARL methods have primarily considered value-oriented attacks, leaving a gap in robustness when interaction structures themselves are corrupted. In this paper, we propose an interaction-breaking adversarial learning (IBAL) framework that takes an information-theoretic view to construct attacks that impede coordination by perturbing agents' observations and actions, and trains agents to perform reliably under such disruptions. Empirically, our approach improves robustness over existing robust MARL baselines across diverse attack settings and yields stronger performance even under agent-missing scenarios. Our code is available at https://sunwoolee0504.github.io/IBAL.

Sunwoo Lee, Mingu Kang, Yonghyeon Jo +1

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Adversarial Transferability Coordination Attack Surface

Ask PDF

May 7, 2026cs.AI

Randomness is sometimes necessary for coordination

Full parameter sharing is standard in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) for homogeneous agents. Under permutation-symmetric observations, however, a shared deterministic policy outputs identical action distributions for every agent, making role differentiation impossible. This failure can theoretically be resolved using symmetry breaking among anonymous identical processors, which requires randomness. We propose Diamond Attention, a cross-attention architecture in which each agent samples a scalar random number per timestep, inducing a transient rank ordering that masks lower-ranked peers from agent-to-agent attention while leaving task attention fully unmasked. This realizes a random-bit coordination protocol in a single broadcast round, and the set-based attention enables zero-shot deployment to teams of different sizes. We evaluate across three regimes that isolate when structured randomness matters. On the perfectly symmetric XOR game, our method achieves

1.0

success while all deterministic baselines plateau near

0.5

. On control coordination tasks, a policy trained on

N=4

generalizes zero-shot to

N \in [2,8]

. On SMACLite cross-scenario transfer, we achieve zero-shot transfer where standard baselines cannot transfer due to structural limitations. Furthermore, replacing the structured mask with standard dropout-based randomness results in a 0% win rate, confirming that protocol-space structure, not stochastic noise, is the operative ingredient. https://anonymous.4open.science/r/randomness-137A/

Rohan Patil, Jai Malegaonkar, Henrik I. Christensen

Coordination Random

Ask PDF

May 7, 2026cs.MA

Coordination Matters: Evaluation of Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) benchmarks commonly emphasize aggregate outcomes such as return, success rate, or completion time. While essential, these metrics often fail to reveal how agents coordinate, particularly in settings where agents, tasks, and joint assignment choices scale combinatorially. We propose a coordination-aware evaluation perspective that supplements return with process-level diagnostics. We instantiate this perspective using STAT, a controlled commitment-constrained spatial task-allocation testbed that systematically varies agents, tasks, and environment size while holding observation access and task rules fixed. We evaluate six representative value-based MARL methods across varying levels of centralization. Our results show that similar return trends can reflect distinct coordination mechanisms, including differences in redundant assignment, assignment diversity, and task-completion efficiency. We find that in commitment-constrained task allocation, performance under scale is shaped not only by nominal action-space size, but also by assignment pressure, sparse decision opportunities, and redundant choices among interdependent agents. Our findings motivate coordination-aware evaluation as a necessary complement to return-based benchmarking for cooperative MARL.

Maria Ana Cardei, Matthew Landers, Afsaneh Doryab

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Global Coordination Coordination Decision-Aware Evaluation

Ask PDF