Medical imaging artificial intelligence has achieved strong performance in isolated image interpretation, but remains poorly aligned with radiological practice, where diagnosis and follow-up rely on comparison across prior studies and analogous reference cases. Here we formulate radiological comparison as an entity-aware cross-image reasoning problem and introduce a framework that supports both reference-case retrieval and temporal comparative interpretation. We construct MedReCo-DB, a large-scale comparative imaging resource derived from routine image-report pairs, comprising more than 690,000 images from over 160,000 patients across eight institutions, four countries and seven imaging modalities. Reports are decomposed into anatomical structures, abnormal findings and pathological conditions to provide supervision for entity-conditioned retrieval and comparative visual question answering. Using this resource, we develop MedReCo, an entity-aware visual encoder for controllable retrieval of clinically analogous cases, and MedReCo-VLM, a vision--language extension for generative interpretation of interval change. Across internal, external and cross-center evaluations, MedReCo achieved the highest Recall@1 in all 12 internal retrieval settings and improved external retrieval by a mean of 6.0 percentage points. In clinically confusable differential groups, it consistently outperformed the strongest baselines. MedReCo-VLM achieved the best performance across all comparative generation evaluations and improved longitudinal follow-up accuracy by 14.5-46.5 percentage points on chest radiographs and 13.0-27.9 percentage points on CT. These findings suggest that entity-aware comparative reasoning can be learned from routine clinical data at scale and may provide a more clinically aligned foundation for medical imaging AI.
Medical imaging artificial intelligence (AI) is commonly developed as separate mappings from radiographs to diagnostic outputs or from clinical descriptions to generated images, although both arise from the same underlying radiographic state. A world-model formulation instead seeks to learn an internal representation of this state that can support both clinical readout and conditional simulation of radiographic observations. Here we introduce MedDream, a radiographic world model that learns a shared continuous latent state from paired chest radiograph-text observations for diagnostic reasoning and report-conditioned evidence generation. MedDream was pretrained on 2.65 million leakage-controlled chest radiograph-text pairs curated from 4.40 million candidates. Across eight clinical datasets and two independent reader cohorts, MedDream outperformed leading diagnostic and generative comparators. For diagnostic reasoning, MedDream showed strong generalization across disease recognition, label-scarce adaptation, severity assessment, and localization, while MedDream-supported review increased mean resident concordance with independent radiologist consensus from 56.3% to 63.0%. For evidence generation, MedDream produced radiographs that preserved clinically relevant pathology and improved downstream performance on held-out real data, with synthetic augmentation increasing external VinDr-CXR macro-AUROC from 76.4% to 81.4%. More importantly, conditioning generation on prespecified subgroup performance gaps enabled targeted evidence construction, increasing weighted F1 by 3.1 percentage points in Asian patients, whereas matched-volume unguided augmentation decreased it by 2.3 points. These findings establish radiographic world models as a path toward medical AI that learns clinically meaningful internal states for interpreting, simulating, and constructing evidence for clinical use.
Recent radiology-adapted vision-language models have achieved strong performance on standard report generation benchmarks, yet their robustness and generalization remain constrained by imperfect alignment and correlation between visual and textual features. Existing methods connect image and text either implicitly through autoregressive report supervision or explicitly through contrastive learning. However, autoregressive supervision alone is insufficient to establish reliable image-text alignment, while contrastive learning can push apart unpaired reports that describe related pathologies simply because they are not paired with the same image. This is problematic in radiology, where different reports may share compatible pathology semantics rather than being true negatives. As a result, the learned representation may fail to organize images and reports around shared pathology concepts, causing the decoder to rely on pretrained language priors and generate clinically plausible reports that are not fully supported by radiographic evidence. To address this issue, we propose PALM, a pathology-aware alignment framework for radiology report generation. Instead of directly matching each image-report pair while separating all others, PALM aligns visual and textual features through shared pathology prototypes. These prototypes provide a clinically meaningful bridge between radiographic evidence and textual findings, allowing cases with similar pathology semantics to move toward common concepts without separating compatible cases. In addition, we introduce Masked Evidence Modeling to strengthen the image encoder sensitivity to local radiographic evidence by learning semantic changes caused by masked image regions. Experiments on MIMIC-CXR, IU X-Ray, and MIMIC-ABN show that PALM consistently improves both report generation and abnormality-focused robustness.
As AI systems are increasingly used to draft radiology reports, reliably evaluating their clinical quality remains a critical challenge. Large language model (LLM)-based metrics are now the best-correlated with radiologist judgment, yet they output a single opaque score that neither a clinician nor a model builder can easily interpret or audit. We introduce RadMatch, a multi-stage, LLM-based metric that decomposes report comparison into a structured finding-level matching with significance-aware scoring and error characterization across seven clinical attribute dimensions (status, location, severity, morphology, certainty, longitudinal comparison, and measurement). The main score is the actionable-error count, both interpretable and auditable. Candidate findings are graded correct, partial, or incorrect, and unmatched findings are counted as missed or hallucinated. Triage and actionable safety recall/precision and per-subset views add complementary, deployment-oriented lenses. Across two expert benchmarks, RadMatch is the most clinically aligned metric, matching inter-radiologist agreement on ReXVal and more than doubling the best prior metric on the harder RadEvalExpert. Relying only on few-shot prompting, it is designed to extend to other modalities and anatomies. We will release RadMatch as open-source code with an interactive dashboard for inspecting results.