Extending Responsibility-Sensitive Safety for the Assessment of Offloaded Autonomous Driving Services
Authors: Robin Dehler, Aryan Thakur, Michael Buchholz
Organizations: Institute of Measurement, Control and Microtechnology, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 41, 89081 Ulm, Germany
Abstract
Safety is a fundamental requirement in the development of autonomous driving (AD) systems. While function offloading has demonstrated significant benefits in terms of computational efficiency and energy consumption, its application to safety-critical AD functionality introduces new challenges. In particular, offloaded service compositions incur increased and variable response times due to wireless vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication, which directly affects the vehicle's reaction time and thus its safety guarantees. In this paper, we address this challenge by extending the definitions of Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS) to explicitly account for different response times of local and offloaded AD service compositions. Based on this extension, we propose an integration into function offloading, using the RSS safety constraints for offloading decision-making and fallback mechanisms. Offloaded service compositions are only permitted if the current traffic situation remains safe under the corresponding end-to-end response time. If this condition is violated, the system performs a controlled fallback to local execution. Furthermore, we introduce an enhanced fallback strategy that includes a warm-standby phase for offloaded services, enabling faster and safer transitions from offloaded to local services. The proposed approach is integrated into our AD stack and evaluated in both simulation and the real world. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method improves safety compared to state-of-the-art function offloading and safety frameworks, while preserving the benefits of distributed computation when safety conditions allow.
This paper studies runtime safety for autonomous driving when high-level driving commands become faulty or unreliable. Unlike conventional runtime-safety approaches that mainly focus on immediate vehicle safety, the proposed framework evaluates both driving safety and whether the vehicle can still successfully complete its mission before a command is executed. The framework extends highway-env with mission-level fault scenarios such as skipping required checkpoints, entering restricted areas, and generating future routes that can no longer complete the mission successfully. A runtime monitoring system is introduced to detect and reject unsafe or mission-infeasible commands before execution. For comparison, an adapted Simplex-Drive runtime-safety baseline with learning-based driving control, safety fallback control, and runtime controller switching is implemented using the public Simplex-Drive framework. Experimental results show that platform-level runtime safety alone cannot detect mission-level planning faults, while the proposed framework successfully rejects mission-infeasible commands and improves mission success under randomized fault conditions.
Reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated considerable potential for autonomous driving decision-making. However, its deployment in urban autonomous driving, particularly at highly interactive unsignalized intersections, remains challenging, as learned policies may struggle to maintain both safety and robust decision-making in complex traffic situations. Conventional safety-filtering approaches typically employ fixed conservative constraints, which may improve safety at the cost of excessive intervention and degraded traffic efficiency. To address these limitations, we propose a Risk-sensitive and Uncertainty-aware Decision-making and Control (RUDC) framework for safe and robust autonomous driving. RUDC couples risk-sensitive distributional RL with ensemble-based policy uncertainty quantification, jointly accounting for tail risks in return distributions and uncertainty in learned policies. An uncertainty-aware high-order control barrier function (HOCBF)-based safety correction mechanism adaptively adjusts constraint strictness according to policy uncertainty, while a learnable residual predictor compensates for CBF model mismatches and discretization errors. Extensive simulations at unsignalized intersections demonstrate that RUDC achieves a favorable balance among safety, efficiency, and robustness, outperforming representative safe RL baselines under both nominal and challenging OOD and long-tail scenarios while satisfying real-time requirements.
Ensuring both safety and efficiency in decision-making for autonomous driving systems remains a fundamental challenge. Traditional Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) suffers from unsafe random exploration and slow convergence, while Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate inherent latency in real-time inference operations. To address these limitations, this paper proposes SARAD, a novel safety-aware hybrid framework that synergizes LLMs and DRL for autonomous driving. SARAD substitutes the random exploration of DRL with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-enhanced, LLM-guided decisions sourced from a dynamic expert knowledge repository. An attention discriminator is proposed to integrate the prior knowledge of LLMs into DRL policy optimization. A collision predictor module, fine-tuned with historical collision data, is further designed to improve vehicle safety. Extensive experiments show that SARAD achieves significant performance improvements in the Highway-Env simulator, validating the effectiveness of the proposed model in autonomous driving.