cs.CVJun 6, 2026

3D Oral Modelling with Improved Vertex Distribution Using Matching-Based Learning

Authors: Jihun ChoSoo-Yeon JeongEun-Jeong BaeSun-Young Ihm

Abstract

In our previous work, a deep learning-based framework for 3D intraoral reconstruction was proposed. The model directly predicts explicit 3D point cloud coordinates from ten fixed-angle intraoral images, employing MobileNetV2 and Multi-head Attention for multi-view feature fusion, with a combined L1 Loss and Chamfer Distance as the loss function. Although the model achieved an accuracy of 77.49%, predicted vertices tended to concentrate in high-density regions of the ground truth, leaving other regions largely uncovered. In this paper, an improved loss function is proposed to address this limitation. Hungarian matching with filtering and Repulsion Loss are introduced to enforce more uniform vertex distribution across the reconstructed model. The proposed model achieves an accuracy of 68.02%, which is numerically lower than the previous model. However, the vertex clustering issue observed in the prior work is substantially alleviated, with predicted vertices distributed more evenly across the entire reconstructed surface.

Explore similar work

Jun 4, 2026cs.CV

Deep Learning-based 3D Oral Cavity Reconstruction Using 2D Intraoral Images

Oral 3D modelling is one of the most essential stages in dentistry, and many different approaches, such as impression taking and intraoral scanning, are commonly used for this phase, each with notable limitations. Impression taking, which involves placing alginate or silicone material in a tray and inserting it into the patient's oral cavity to form a negative mold, suffers from significant patient discomfort, material deformation errors, and difficulties in storage and transportation. Intraoral scanners, which directly scan oral structures in real time using structured light or laser technology, produce state-of-the-art results but are associated with substantially high equipment costs. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a software-based approach that reconstructs a 3D oral model using only ten 2D intraoral images captured from different angles, requiring no dedicated hardware devices. The proposed method reduces cost, eliminates the need for physical scanning equipment, minimises patient discomfort, and enables automated 3D reconstruction. The model is trained on the publicly available Dental3DS dataset, comprising 950 upper jaw samples, and employs MobileNetV2 as the image encoder combined with Multi-head Attention for multi-view feature fusion. The proposed model achieves an accuracy of 77.49%, measured by nearest-neighbor matching with a distance threshold of 0.035. However, predicted vertices tend to concentrate in high-density regions of the ground truth, resulting in uneven point distribution across the reconstructed model.
Jihun Cho, Soo-Yeon Jeong, Eun-Jeong Bae +1
Sep 8, 2026cs.CV

RoMa-ΩΩ: What Feed-Forward 3D Models Know About Image Matching

Learned image matching has experienced significant progress in recent years, culminating in robust and accurate matchers such as RoMa, whose robustness is often attributed to its use of frozen DINO features. In a parallel development, feed-forward reconstruction models, such as VGGT, have been trained on ever-growing datasets to accurately regress dense 3D point maps and camera poses. The distinction between matchers and feed-forward reconstruction models has become increasingly blurred with the introduction of matching losses in models such as MASt3R and VGGT-ΩΩ. This raises a natural question: what do feed-forward 3D models know about image matching? In this work, we answer this question by analyzing three scenarios: (i) zero-shot matching of patch features, (ii) direct matching of 3D point predictions, and (iii) training a full matcher on top of the learned representations. We find that, despite performing poorly in zero-shot matching, especially in later layers, feed-forward reconstruction models provide strong representations for linear probing and full matching pipelines. We further show that, even without any training, their raw predictions alone enable competitive matching, albeit only under moderate viewpoint changes and modality gaps. Based on these insights, we retrain RoMa v2 by replacing its DINO backbone with VGGT-ΩΩ. Our resulting model, \ours, outperforms state-of-the-art matchers on a wide range of benchmarks, e.g. +8.1 mAA compared to RoMa v2 on WxBS.
David Nordström, Xinyue Zhang, Thibaut Loiseau +2
May 2, 2026cs.CV

Registration-Free Learnable Multi-View Capture of Faces in Dense Semantic Correspondence

Recent frameworks like ToFu and TEMPEH provide an automated alternative to classical registration pipelines by predicting 3D meshes in dense semantic correspondence directly from calibrated multi-view images. However, these learning-based methods rely on the slow, manual registration pipelines they aim to replace for their training supervision. We overcome this limitation with MOCHI (Multi-view Optimizable Correspondence of Heads from Images), a multi-view 3D face prediction framework trained without requiring registered training data. MOCHI eliminates the registration data dependency by enforcing topological consistency through a pseudo-linear inverse kinematic solver. Semantic alignment is guided by dense keypoints from a 2D landmark predictor trained exclusively on synthetic data. Our analysis further reveals that standard point-to-surface distances induce training instabilities and visual artifacts in registration-free settings. We propose pointmap- and normal-based losses instead, which provide smoother gradients and superior reconstruction fidelity. Finally, we introduce a test-time optimization scheme that refines network weights over a few dozen iterations. This approach bridges the gap between feed-forward efficiency and iterative optimization precision, allowing MOCHI to outperform traditional labor-intensive pipelines in both reconstruction accuracy and visual quality. Code and model are public at: https://filby89.github.io/mochi.
Panagiotis P. Filntisis, George Retsinas, Radek Daněček +3