cs.CVJun 6, 2026

One Stone, Three Birds: Self-adaptive Optimal Transport for Multi-VLM Selection, Adaptation, and Ensembling

Authors: Qiyu XuZhanxuan HuYu DuanYonghang TaiHuafeng LiQuanxue GaoXiangyong Cao

Abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) enable visual recognition from semantic class descriptions, which makes them attractive when target annotations are scarce or unavailable. Most deployment pipelines, however, first choose a single VLM and then adapt that model to the unlabeled target set. This single-backbone paradigm hides a critical assumption: the selected VLM is already compatible with the target domain. In realistic cross-domain deployment, several general-purpose and domain-specialized VLMs may be plausible, yet no instance-level target labels are available to identify the reliable ones. Deployment therefore requires a coupled solution for model selection, target adaptation, and prediction integration. We revisit this problem from a system-level multi-VLM perspective. Our central observation is that the three decisions above depend on the same latent object: a trustworthy sample-class structure in the target set. Different VLMs may encode different transfer biases and produce conflicting predictions, but their outputs can still provide complementary evidence for estimating this structure. We propose One Stone, Three Birds, a training-free framework based on self-adaptive optimal transport. Given a pool of frozen candidate VLMs, OSTB estimates a consensus sample-to-class transport plan without updating VLM parameters. The learned transport structure is then reused for all deployment objectives: model selection is performed by ranking the combined semantic and visual reliability induced by the consensus plan; target adaptation is obtained by fitting transport-conditioned visual classifiers; and ensembling is implemented through reliability-aware probabilistic integration. Extensive experiments on natural-image, remote-sensing, and medical-pathology benchmarks show that OSTB improves model ranking, adaptation stability, and ensemble robustness under heterogeneous candidate pools.

Explore similar work

Feb 1, 2026cs.AI

Model Specific Task Similarity for Vision Language Model Selection via Layer Conductance

While open sourced Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have proliferated, selecting the optimal pretrained model for a specific downstream task remains challenging. Exhaustive evaluation is often infeasible due to computational constraints and data limitations in few shot scenarios. Existing selection methods fail to fully address this: they either rely on data-intensive proxies or use symmetric textual descriptors that neglect the inherently directional and model-specific nature of transferability. To address this problem, we propose a framework that grounds model selection in the internal functional dynamics of the visual encoder. Our approach represents each task via layer wise conductance and derives a target-conditioned block importance distribution through entropy regularized alignment. Building on this, we introduce Directional Conductance Divergence (DCD), an asymmetric metric that quantifies how effectively a source task covers the target's salient functional blocks. This allows for predicting target model rankings by aggregating source task ranks without direct inference. Experimental results on 48 VLMs across 21 datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving a 14.7% improvement in NDCG@5 over SWAB.
Wei Yang, Hong Xie, Tao Tan +3
Sep 8, 2026cs.CV

To Adapt or Not to Adapt? Selective Adaptation for Vision-Language Models

Test-time adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a prominent strategy for adapting vision-language models to distribution shifts during inference. We conduct a per-sample analysis of model predictions before and after adaptation, and observe two failure modes in existing TTA methods that echo previous work. Adaptations are frequently negligible, yielding no change in the model's predictions, and more severely, they can be detrimental by flipping previously correct predictions to incorrect ones. This naturally raises a question: Can we identify and skip such negligible or harmful adaptations? In this work, we introduce a new problem of selective adaptation, which aims to determine whether a given test sample should undergo adaptation or be skipped. To this end, we propose Cross-Augmentation Similarity (CAS), a simple baseline that performs adaptation only when predictions across augmented views exhibit low similarity. Notably, CAS not only preserves but in some cases improves overall accuracy, even when skipping nearly 85% of the adaptation process. We hope other researchers will explore this new direction and surpass the performance of our baseline. Our code is available at https://github.com/sirujiang/selective-adaptation.
Siru Jiang, Yuwei Liang, Jian Liang +2
Sep 12, 2026cs.CV

Your Model Already Knows Don't Teach It, Learn to Ask It: Soft Prompting for Few-Shot Adaptation of Vision-Language Models

We address few-shot object detection with vision-language models (VLMs) in out-of-domain settings such as aerial, industrial, and medical imagery, using only ten annotated images for supervision. Existing adaptation methods are discrete prompt optimization and LoRA fine-tuning. We revisit a third option: soft prompting, where a small number of continuous prompt tokens are optimized while the pretrained backbone remains frozen. We identify two key design choices. First, placing prompt tokens at the cross-modal boundary between visual and text tokens outperforms other placements (10.0 vs. 8.4 mAP). Second, initializing prompts from the empty space token outperforms semantic and random initialization. With these choices, one to three learned tokens (7,168 parameters on average) match the best LoRA configuration on Roboflow20-VL (14.2 mAP, 10-shot) while training over 20,000x fewer parameters. Soft prompting remains harder to optimize, exhibiting higher variance across random seeds. Unlike LoRA, however, it causes no forgetting: the LoRA rank matching our accuracy reduces NaturalBench VQA accuracy by 35% relative, rising to 56% at the largest rank, whereas soft prompting leaves pretrained performance unchanged. The learned tokens behave like prompts rather than weights. They transfer to a newer model without retraining (+0.8 mAP on Qwen3.5-9B) and can be verbalized into readable prompts competitive with prompt-search methods (matching DetPO and outperforming GEPA). The approach also extends beyond detection. On RoboCasa manipulation tasks, the frozen π0.5\pi_{0.5} vision-language-action policy benefits from soft prompting, matching the LoRA baseline on two of three tasks when tokens are placed at the gradient bottleneck. These results suggest modern VLMs already encode much of what is needed for specialized domains; the challenge is learning how to ask.
Gautam Rajendrakumar Gare, Siyi Li, Hewei Wang +5