cs.ROJun 6, 2026

Toward Interaction Dynamics: A Predictive Framework for Safe Physical Human Robot Interaction

Authors: Yongyan Cao, Jinshan Tang

Abstract

Physical human-robot interaction requires yielding transiently to contact yet recovering the commanded reference under sustained load. Finite-stiffness impedance control retains a static deflection there, while predictive alternatives typically optimize a nonlinear robot or impedance model online. Operational-space cancellation instead exposes a translational error double integrator with a fixed transition matrix and a configuration-scheduled input map, making interaction a predictive quantity rather than a property re-derived per configuration. We build on it a compact offset-free interaction-error MPC for torque-controlled manipulators: a force-domain random-walk state estimates persistent interaction and model error, and a 30-variable convex QP maps the correction through the current task inertia while constraining the applied joint torque. Conditional results establish impedance equivalence of the unconstrained passive feedback, offset-free regulation at feasible frozen configurations, and quadratic stabilizability of the scheduled backbone. In a 1kHz MuJoCo simulation of a 7-DOF Franka FR3, the estimator cuts steady-state error under a repeated 15N step from 2.77mm to 0.042mm when added to the otherwise identical 100Hz MPC. A stiffness-and-damping-calibrated impedance baseline attains 2.59mm but briefly saturates and needs 3.3x the peak positive joint power. Adding ideal measured-force cancellation to that baseline gives 1.39mm, so constant-load rejection is not unique to MPC; the sensorless controller still reaches 0.042mm in the moving task, a 65x reduction without force sensing and without the baseline's saturation or power cost. Demonstrated in simulation under a shared actuator budget, the contribution is an efficient operational-space realization complementing rather than replacing broader interaction-control architectures.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Sep 1, 2026cs.RO

Behavior--Realization Separation for Constrained Physical Human--Robot Interaction

Physical human--robot interaction software often couples desired-behavior specification with constrained realization; we treat these as separate layers. A \emph{behavior layer} supplies a desired contact-port acceleration akid=fθ(ek,e˙k,Fh,k)a_k^{\mathrm{id}}=f_θ(e_k,\dot e_k,F_{h,k}). A \emph{realization layer} converts it into constrained robot commands and reports total desired-versus-realized acceleration error instead of hiding it in saturation. A same-objective unconstrained counterfactual separates regularization from constraint intervention, while plant data expose model error. This paper implements a receding-horizon quadratic program realizing memoryless affine behaviors. Changing the behavior modifies objective coefficients through (Cθ,Gθ)(C_θ,G_θ) while the robot-command variable and feasible set remain unchanged. A planar study instantiates impedance and admittance; the same running layer accepts an impedance--admittance--impedance reassignment without reconstruction, under its existing rate limit. On a torque-controlled 7-DOF Franka FR3 in MuJoCo, the runtime freezes task-space dynamics per solve and enforces torque feasibility across its horizon. Under a sustained 20N push, it holds a slack-relaxed workspace boundary to within approximately 0.1--0.2mm, versus 4.4cm (impedance) and 4.7cm (admittance) overshoot from instantaneous clipping. A derated actuator budget then activates the torque constraint: horizon-wide enforcement keeps its frozen-model plan feasible to 2.1×10−42.1\times10^{-4}N⋅\cdotm, whereas a first-step-only ablation plans up to 11.329N⋅\cdotm beyond budget; on the executed nonlinear plant, where both share the same local-model error, the gap is smaller but still favors horizon-wide enforcement (0.161 vs.\ 0.380~N⋅\cdotm). These results are a focused proof of behavior--realization separation.
Yongyan Cao
Human-Robot InteractionActuatorConstraint AdherenceAcceleration
AskPDF
Jun 12, 2026cs.RO

Interaction Dynamics for Dexterous Manipulation

Dexterous manipulation is fundamentally a problem of interaction dynamics: the hand must track precise finger trajectories, regulate the contact force exchanged with grasped objects, respect actuation and safety limits, and remain predictable when contact persists -- objectives in tension for any fixed-gain controller. A sustained contact torque τextτ_{\text{ext}} through a joint stiffness KdK_d produces the structural bias e∞=τext/Kde_\infty=τ_{\text{ext}}/K_d, so stiffening for accuracy sacrifices contact safety while softening yields by design. We make these interaction dynamics explicit and actuator-agnostic through a constant-AdA_d double-integrator backbone, instantiating the offset-free architecture established for physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) and preserving its modeling assumptions on the reduced residual dynamics. An algebraic feedforward reduces the tendon transmission -- hydraulic, cable, pneumatic, twisted-string, or series-elastic -- to a constant-coefficient double integrator, so the QP cost inverse is precomputed offline and a 10-step receding-horizon QP runs at 500,Hz under contact-force (ISO/TS 15066), actuation, and jerk constraints. An encoder-only augmented-Kalman disturbance state drives steady-state error to zero under constant contact loads in the nominal detectable case. In simulation, a hydraulically actuated finger -- the worked example, adding pressure and cavitation constraints -- attains 0.6,mrad RMS, 0.1,mrad steady-state, and 7.3,mrad peak deflection under 1.5,Nm contact: 153×\times, 1500×\times, and 21×\times better than classical impedance. The realized first-move stiffness (18→\to323,Nm/rad with update rate) is independently verified, and the architecture scales to a 16-DOF LEAP Hand MuJoCo model, recovering from 2.5,N grasp disturbances within 0.7,s.
Yongyan Cao
Robotic HandsDexterous ManipulationActuatorStiffness ModulationInteraction Dynamics
AskPDF
May 30, 2026cs.RO

Adaptive PD Gains for Energy-Conscious Control in Physical Human-Robot Interaction

Compliant force or torque control are approaches often investigated to achieve safe physical human-robot interaction (pHRI). However, these approaches have limitations. Force control requires a robot to be equipped with external force sensors to track the amplitude and direction of applied forces. Torque control requires torque sensing or estimation in each joint. As this is not available on every robot, energy-based approaches offer a promising alternative. Such approaches aim to achieve safe pHRI by limiting the mechanical energy of the robot. Current schemes leveraging an energy-based approach tend to have a complex implementation, and some may require further stability verification. We hence propose an adaptive proportional-derivative (PD) controller that can limit a robot's energy under any given limit to achieve safe pHRI. The proposed controller can limit both the kinetic and potential energy of a robot, and the behaviour of the controller gains can be shaped using various parameters, defining precisely the cutoff limit and sharpness. We construct a stability proof for the controller and define a condition to ensure the controller's stability. The proposed controller's behaviour and compliance are tested on the TALOS robot from PAL Robotics both in simulation and on hardware, verifying the expected compliant and energy-limiting behaviour of the controller.
Danyal Saqib, Francisco Andrade Chavez, Marie Charbonneau
ActuatorGeneralizable Robot ControlHuman-Robot InteractionEnergy Based Models
AskPDF