ClinicalAligner26AM: A Cross-Lingual Aligner for Dataset Translation; Evidences from the MultiClinCorpus Shared Task

ClinicalEncoder26AM is a multilingual Diagnosable ColBERT for clinical and biomedical texts, which aligns at multiple levels its token-level semantic with ClinicalMap25, a clinical latent space inspired by BioLORD-2023 and enriched with synthetic and annotated supervision. The post-training recipe builds upon BGE-M3, and combines synthetic clinical notes, patient--doctor conversations, and annotated resources such as MedMentions, while considering both named-entity-level and sentence-level representations in a multi-adapter distillation, along with a ColBERT-style retrieval objective. In this system demonstration paper, we evaluate the model in the MultiClinNER shared task by finetuning it as a BIO tagger for patient symptoms, disorders, and procedure spans, using a lightweight two-layer CNN head to improve local boundary detection. The resulting system remains simple, processes most documents in a single 8192-token window, and achieves state-of-the-art multilingual entity recall, while achieving Top 5 overall across all entity types and languages in Character-weighted F1 scores. Training curves further show that ClinicalEncoder26AM is markedly more data-efficient than the base M3 model, supporting the usefulness of its clinical post-training for downstream information extraction. The model can be downloaded on https://huggingface.co/Parallia/ClinicalEncoder26AM-Diagnosable-Colbert-L2-for-multilingual-medical-texts

Background: To determine whether cross-lingual clinical annotation projection can be formulated as a text-preserving, document-level generative task that produces verifiable character-level annotations for multilingual clinical corpus construction, and to characterize its robustness and computational trade-offs relative to candidate-based projection pipelines. Methods: We developed a constrained LLM projection workflow that inserts entity tags directly into immutable target-language text, followed by deterministic validation and character-offset reconstruction. We evaluated it alongside supervised candidate-span projection and hybrid ML-LLM refinement for transferring Spanish Disease, Symptom, and Procedure annotations into six languages. Evaluation used MultiClinAI gold standard with strict span matching and character-overlap F1 Results: Direct LLM projection achieved the strongest and most consistent performance. GLM 5.2 obtained a mean Strict F1 of 0.9201 across 18 language-entity combinations, while locally deployable Gemma4:31B achieved 0.9133. The best LLM configuration improved Strict F1 over the previous state of the art in all 18 settings, by 0.0564-0.1512, yielding 55,416 grounded mentions with reconstructed offsets. Conclusions: Direct LLM-based projection enables high-quality multilingual clinical annotation transfer and provides a practical approach for extending clinical NLP resources to languages with fewer annotated datasets and language-specific tools. Combined with local inference and deterministic validation, it can substantially reduce expert time and cost for multilingual clinical corpus construction.

Multilingual large language models (LLMs) have been shown to perform better on non-English classification tasks when the representations of the given language are more aligned to English within the model. Several cross-lingual alignment (CLA) scores have been proposed for use with LLMs, along with multiple approaches for extracting embeddings from the models. We provide a comparative analysis of 27 CLA score variants, examining how they differ and how well each predicts downstream performance across three tasks. Crucially, while LLMs are widely used for generative tasks such as machine translation, prior work has focused almost exclusively on classification. We therefore investigate whether CLA scores are similarly predictive of translation performance. To enable computing correlations across target languages, we propose a PMI-based translation metric, which is less dependent on the target language and correlates strongly with chrF. We find that CLA with English predicts translation quality comparably to or better than source-target CLA, providing new evidence that LLMs use English as an internal pivot language.