MAAM: Anchor-Preserving Compression and Contextual Calibration for Chinese Discriminatory Language Detection

Yuxin Fu; Shijing Si

cs.CLJun 8, 2026

MAAM: Anchor-Preserving Compression and Contextual Calibration for Chinese Discriminatory Language Detection

Authors: Yuxin Fu, Shijing Si

Organizations: School of Economics and Finance, Shanghai International Studies University · Shanghai, China

Abstract

Chinese discriminatory-language detection is challenging because harmful intent is often implicit and context-dependent. We propose MAAM (Myopia--Astigmatism Anchor Mechanism), a lightweight, model-agnostic framework inspired by functional visual blur: rather than preserving every token equally, MAAM retains discrimination-relevant semantic anchors and calibrates them with C--I--S contextual priors (Contextual Tone, Group Identity, and Stance Polarity). We also introduce ChLGBT, to our knowledge the first Chinese LGBT-focused discriminatory-language dataset, with 8,120 manually annotated samples and three ordinal labels: explicit bias, implicit bias, and emotional intensity. Across strong encoder baselines, MAAM improves all three prediction dimensions, with consistent gains in accuracy, F1, Brier score, and expected calibration error. Compared with frontier LLM baselines under zero-shot and few-shot prompting protocols, MAAM remains competitive while offering stronger compactness and stability. These results suggest that interpretable anchor preservation and contextual calibration provide a practical alternative to heavier model scaling for Chinese discriminatory-language assessment.

Explore similar work

Side-by-side Comparison Amplifies Dialect Bias in Language Models
May 23, 2026Kritee Kondapally, Claire J. Smerdon, Pooja C. Patel +5Large Language Model Bias Dialects
Auditing demographic bias in AI-based emergency police dispatch: a cross-lingual evaluation of eleven large language models
May 2, 2026William Guey, Wei Zhang, Pierrick Bougault +4Large Language Model Bias Algorithm Auditing
Anchoring LLM Gender Bias to Human Baselines: A Cross-Lingual Audit
May 29, 2026Jiwoo Choi, Seonwoo Ahn, Tongxin Zhang +1Large Language Model Bias Stereotype Mitigation

May 23, 2026 · cs.CLJ/K move · Enter open · S save

Side-by-side Comparison Amplifies Dialect Bias in Language Models

Kritee Kondapally, Claire J. Smerdon, Pooja C. Patel, Ogheneyoma Akoni+4

University of Southern California, USA

Language models (LMs) can exhibit biases based on variations in their dialects, even in the absence of a dialect label, a behavior known as covert dialect bias. In this work, we quantify covert dialect bias in online discourse by evaluating how LMs associate stereotypical traits (derived from social psychology research on racial bias) with intent-equivalent tweets in Standard American English (SAE) and African-American Vernacular English (AAVE). While prior work shows that LMs associate more negative stereotypes with AAVE when evaluating tweets in isolation, we are surprised to find that this bias is significantly exacerbated when SAE / AAVE tweet pairs are compared side by side, a setting that more closely reflects high-impact decision making contexts in which models are used to rank candidates. The bias only worsens when dialect labels are explicitly specified. This is striking, given the extensive efforts from commercial developers to mitigate bias in their LMs. Encouragingly, we show that counterfactual fairness finetuning can mitigate covert dialect bias for some stereotypical traits, reducing average disparities when evaluating tweets in isolation, however, these improvements do not consistently hold across traits when evaluating SAE / AAVE tweets side by side. Our findings show that existing evaluation settings for covert dialect bias may underestimate its severity, specifically in contrastive settings. Additionally, overt dialect bias remains pronounced even after safety aligned finetuning, indicating that it remains an unresolved problem, and motivates the need for more robust evaluation and mitigation frameworks.

Large Language Model Bias Dialects Stereotype Mitigation Linguistics African Languages Comparison

Open paper Ask about it PDF

Abstract

Explore similar work

Side-by-side Comparison Amplifies Dialect Bias in Language Models

Auditing demographic bias in AI-based emergency police dispatch: a cross-lingual evaluation of eleven large language models

Anchoring LLM Gender Bias to Human Baselines: A Cross-Lingual Audit