Organizations: Department of Computer Science, Lakehead University, Canada · Quantum Communications and Computing Research Center and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
Abstract
Open-pit mine scheduling is a critical process for maximizing economic return under complex geotechnical and operational constraints. While Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) provides mathematically optimal baselines, its exponential computational complexity and inability to adapt in real time limit its practical deployment in dynamic industrial environments. This work introduces a simulator-driven Large Language Model (LLM) scheduling framework in which the LLM acts as an autonomous decision-making agent, guided at each step by a custom simulator that encodes geotechnical precedence, extraction-processing coupling, and dynamic capacity constraints directly into the action generation mechanism. Operating entirely zero-shot within a closed, data-secure environment, the framework produces complete, interpretable extraction and processing schedules without cloud-based inference, domain-specific fine-tuning, or retraining. To provide a trustworthy performance benchmark, a novel MILP formulation is developed that incorporates realistic operational and geotechnical constraints. Evaluated across mining instances of varying scale and time periods, the LLM-based framework recovers between 94% and 99% of the MILP optimal NPV while scaling linearly in computation time. These results position simulator-constrained LLM agents as a practical and scalable alternative to classical optimization for long-horizon industrial scheduling under complex operational constraints.
Strategic mine production scheduling under geological uncertainty is conventionally formulated as a stochastic optimization problem in which a fixed extraction sequence and routing decisions are computed ex ante. This plan-driven paradigm treats uncertainty as passive: decisions are hedged across geological scenarios, but planning does not anticipate how future observations will inform future decisions. We propose a different perspective by formulating mine scheduling as a Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP), in which extraction and routing decisions are made sequentially with planning explicitly integrating the expectation of future belief updates. To achieve computational tractability, we introduce a hybrid SA-POMDP architecture that combines simulated annealing-based (SA) value approximation with ensemble-based belief updating via ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation (ES-MDA). At each decision epoch, candidate actions are evaluated through their expected long-term value under the current belief, and the belief is updated as mining observations are assimilated. This yields an adaptive policy rather than a fixed plan. We evaluate the framework on a copper-gold open-pit mining complex with multiple processing destinations. Under a statistically consistent prior, the SA-POMDP reduces the expectation-reality gap from 22.3% to 4.6%, improving realized NPV by USD8.4M relative to one-shot stochastic optimization. Under systematic prior misspecification of 10%, the adaptive framework outperforms static planning by up to USD44.6M (36.9%), demonstrating structural robustness beyond scenario hedging. These results show that sequential belief updating transforms geological uncertainty from a passive constraint into an active component of value creation.
This paper introduces SCHEDBench, a natural-language benchmark for evaluating combinatorial scheduling constraint faithfulness under surface-form variation. Grounded in canonical scheduling instances and solver-derived feasibility and optimality, SCHEDBench assesses whether large language models (LLMs) generate schedules with the same constraint-feasible behavior across varied natural-language (NL) surface forms. SCHEDBench spans 1,132 instances across job-shop scheduling problems (JSP), single and multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems (RCPSP), nurse rostering/scheduling, and curriculum timetabling problems of varying difficulty. Instances are templated into natural language problems using domain-specific templates, themed entities, lexical-syntactic template rephrasing, and constraint-level surface-form variation, with reference solutions verified for feasibility and objective optimality. Across thirteen frontier and open-weight LLMs, we find that models are not reliably invariant to semantically equivalent renderings of the same scheduling problem. Surface-form variation reduces feasibility and induces above-noise shifts in per-instance hard-constraint violations on matched instances. Among the tested isolated axes, constraint reordering yields the clearest above-noise sensitivity.
Progress in neural combinatorial optimization for Dynamic Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem (DFJSP) is currently hindered by a methodological tension: static benchmarks encourage benchmark overfitting, while uncalibrated generators obscure algorithmic capability with stochastic noise. To resolve this, we introduce \textbf{DynaSchedBench}, a diagnostic framework for DFJSP that rigorously controls the instance-generation process. Instead of relying on parameter sampling, our approach utilizes Sequential Event-Space Calibrator (SESC) that computes a novel Schedule Stress Index (SSI) to stratify instances by difficulty. We demonstrate that SESC is substantially more computationally efficient than evolutionary baselines while converging reliably to the target metrics. The framework integrates modular components for instance generation, snapshot-based simulation, agents, evaluation, and visualization, thereby enabling rigorous testing of reactive and lookahead-based policies. Leveraging this calibrated environment, we identify key limitations of LLM-based scheduling agents. Specifically, in step-wise online decision-making for dynamic scheduling, we identify an ``Observability Paradox'': providing agents with oracle access to full structural information can degrade policy performance, underperforming concise information. Furthermore, despite substantial token overhead, tool-augmented and refinement strategies fail to reliably improve performance, and most LLM agents fail to consistently surpass strong dispatching baselines-behaving more like robust heuristic approximators than superior optimizers.