Survival prediction plays a central role for healthcare providers and clinical researchers. Accurate risk stratification enables early intervention and improved patient management. Most existing deep survival models learn one common feature representation for all patients, which may hide important differences between patient subgroups. In contrast, a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework allows different parts of the model to focus on different patient patterns, leading to more individualized representations. Therefore, in this work, we propose a mixture-of-experts enhanced adaptive deep clustering survival framework (AdaCSM) for modeling such heterogeneous survival patterns. We introduce a routing-based expert mechanism that enables conditional specialization within a parametric survival modeling framework. The proposed architecture allocates patients to specialized risk predictors dynamically while preserving the patient survival and subtype clustering objectives. We compare our method with state-of-the-art survival and deep clustering models on multiple real-world longitudinal clinical cohorts spanning diverse disease domains. The proposed method demonstrates improved predictive performance and leads to interpretable results in survival analysis.
Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder that continues to impact millions of people worldwide. Predicting AD conversion during the prodromal stage remains critical for disease understanding and patient care. As such, survival models are widely used for AD risk prediction, yet they are typically static predictors with limited interpretability and no capacity for natural language reasoning. In this work, we propose iLENS, an interpretable large language model (LLM) guided framework based on mixture-of-experts (MoE) for survival prediction in AD conversion. Our approach uses LLM to synthesize structured neuroimaging measurements and unstructured information to guide expert routing. Our framework demonstrates competitive predictive performance and capability in patient subtyping. Furthermore, our framework provides transparent, biologically grounded rationales for its routing decisions, bridging the gap between high-performance survival analysis and interpretable clinical decision support.
Multimodal survival prediction, a crucial yet challenging task, demands the integration of multimodal medical data (\eg Whole Slide Images (WSIs) and Genomic Profiles) to achieve accurate prognostic modeling. Given the inherent heterogeneity across modalities, the feature decoupling-fusion paradigm has emerged as a dominant approach. However, these methods have the following shortcomings: (1) fail to reduce the redundant information of modality features before decoupling, which negatively affects the feature decoupling and fusion effect;(2) lack the ability to model the fine-grained relationships of the features and capture the local information interactions between intra- and inter-modality features. To address these issues, we propose a \underline{H}ierarchical \underline{D}ecoupling-Fusion \underline{M}ixture-\underline{o}f-\underline{E}xperts (HDMoE) framework with two levels of MoE and \underline{R}andom \underline{F}eature \underline{R}eorganization (RFR) modules.In the first-level MoE, shared experts and routed experts are employed to remove redundant information and extract fine-grained specific features within each modality, while the second-level MoE facilitates fine-grained inter-modality feature decoupling. Besides, we design two RFR modules following each level of MoE to finely fuse intra- and inter-modality features, which can help the model capture more fine-grained relationships between modalities. Extensive experimental results on our private Liver Cancer (LC) and three TCGA public datasets confirm the effectiveness of our proposed method. Codes are available at https://github.com/ZJUMAI/HDMoE.
Deep learning models for dynamic survival analysis (DSA) achieve strong predictive performance by incorporating longitudinal patient data, but their black box nature limits clinical trust and adoption. Existing explainability methods cannot handle longitudinal, irregular inputs and functional survival outputs simultaneously, which limits their usability in DSA. We propose DynSHAP, a SHAP framework suited specifically for dynamic survival analysis. It extends common marginal SHAP estimators to this setting by treating time--feature pairs as players in the Shapley game. We further introduce Temporal DynSHAP, which learns linear dependencies in features over time and uses conditional sampling to address them in explanations. When applied to synthetic data with known ground-truth attributions, Temporal DynSHAP recovers temporally dependent features more accurately than marginal estimators for a given state-of-the-art model. Applied to two real-world clinical datasets and two DSA architectures, DynSHAP produces attributions faithful to model learning, allowing medical experts to see which patient information drove the prediction and when.