cs.DSJun 12, 2026

Comparison Patrols on Drifting Orders: Certified Rank Maintenance, Evolving Planar Maxima, and Selection under Drifting Fitness

Authors: Faruk AlpayLevent Sarioglu

Organizations: Department of Computer Engineering, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract

Rank-based selection in dynamic environments acts on order information that becomes stale while it is being used. Tournaments, elitism, truncation, and Pareto selection may therefore consume rankings that no longer match the current fitness order, while full re-evaluation competes with search for the same budget. This paper formulates the missing information layer as a data-structure problem. A hidden total order on nn items drifts by adjacent transpositions, while a maintainer receives one truthful pairwise comparison per step and must answer rank queries continuously. We introduce the comparison patrol, a constant-time maintained-order structure using 3n+O(1)3n+O(1) words, one comparison per update, deterministic verification-age bounds, and per-item displacement certificates. We prove lower bounds showing that oblivious and location-oblivious maintainers incur expected Kendall error Ω(min(α,1)n)Ω(\min(α,1)n), and show that the patrol operates at the same order. A bump invariant yields exact self-stabilization after drift-free corruption: if the maximum rank overstatement is LL, recovery takes at most LL aligned cycles and cannot finish before L1L-1. This gives a deterministic shock-recovery calculus and a crossover with full rebuild near Llog2nL\approx \log_2 n. The maintained order is then transferred to evolving planar maxima and to evolutionary selection rules, giving deterministic bounds for truncation, tournament, elitist, and two-objective Pareto decisions under drifting fitness. Experiments up to n=65,536n=65{,}536 audit the certificates, recovery laws, equilibrium behavior, and equal-budget dynamic evolutionary loops, identifying when certified local rank maintenance outperforms global re-evaluation and when it should hand over.

Explore similar work

May 25, 2026cs.LG

SafetyRepro: Configuration-Conditional Rank Instability on Alignment Benchmarks

Pairwise model comparisons drawn from foundation-model benchmarks ("A is safer than B") are read as quantitative verdicts but hinge on harness choices benchmark papers under-specify. We close one theory-benchmark loop on this primitive: a finite-envelope proposition tying a measurable pairwise-disagreement rate to whether the strict ordering admits a configuration-pair reversal, paired with a commit-stamped evaluation protocol that operationalises it on widely cited alignment benchmarks. On every benchmark we test, configuration choice alone can flip the pairwise verdict; the proposition isolates this strict-reversal failure mode.
Yanhang Li, Zhichao Fan, Zexin Zhuang
Apr 20, 2026cs.LG

Perturbation Sensitivity of Maximum-Likelihood Pairwise Ranking in Computational Decision Systems

Maximum-likelihood pairwise ranking is a com- mon computational mechanism for prioritization, reputation estimation, and comparison-driven decision support. Despite its broad use, the perturbation sensitivity of this estimator under structured changes in comparison data remains insufficiently characterized. We study this question as an applied-mathematics and computational-science problem in stability analysis. We for- mulate coordinated perturbation as a budgeted subset-selection problem over pairwise observations and introduce an Adaptive Subset Selection Attack (ASSA) as a scalable search heuristic for probing high-impact perturbation sets. Through experiments on synthetic and observed preference datasets, we show that MLE-based ranking can exhibit pronounced regime-dependent sensitivity: relatively small but coordinated perturbations may in- duce meaningful changes in output orderings, while the response profile varies across budgets and data conditions. By comparing ASSA with random, greedy, and randomized subset baselines under repeated trials, we characterize both the magnitude and the variability of perturbation-induced ranking shifts. These results position pairwise ranking sensitivity as a problem in computational reliability, numerical stability, and robustness auditing for engineering systems built on comparison-driven inference.
Junyi Yao, Zihao Zheng, Jiayu Long
Jun 20, 2026cs.LG

Ranking-and-Selection with Multiple Correct Answers and Non-Answerable Estimates

We study fixed-precision ranking-and-selection in structured settings where the answer may be non-unique and where noisy estimates may temporarily admit no valid answer at all. This phenomenon arises naturally in problems such as multi-fidelity ranking-and-selection and identifying a Condorcet winner from pairwise comparisons. To address this, we propose a unified framework based on answer-wise acceptance sets, restricted generalized likelihood ratio stopping, and an answer-pitfall decomposition that yields a max-max-min characteristic value and a common sampling principle. We introduce ENDS, a general procedure that combines estimation, nomination, pitfall detection, and cost-aware information-directed selection. We instantiate ENDS for various problems by deriving explicit formulas. Extensive numerical experiments show that this unified recipe performs well across a broad range of pure-exploration problems and offers a practical framework and proof-of-concept algorithmic recipe.
Qiaoqiao Wang, Wei You